It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judicial Watch Uncovers -Cover-Up- Discussions in Latest Production of Clinton Email Documents

page: 1
46
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+17 more 
posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 05:36 PM
link   
Judicial Watch has received hundreds of pages of FBI documents (per FOIA) that shows some interesting stuff about Hillary's private system.

Seems one of her "contractors" had full access to all email (classified stuff and all) !!

Also looks like a cover-up was ongoing well into 2016.

Somebody needs to re-investigate quick like 😎



Judicial Watch Uncovers ‘Cover-Up’ Discussions in Latest Production of Clinton Email Documents

Judicial Watch announced today that it uncovered 422 pages of FBI documents showing evidence of “cover-up” discussions related to the Clinton email system within Platte River Networks, one of the vendors who managed the Clinton email system. The documents also show Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Charles McCullough forwarding “concerns” about classified information in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The new documents uncovered by Judicial Watch also contain Clinton’s 2009 classified information Non-Disclosure Agreement bearing her signature.

FBI notes of an interview with an unidentified Platte River Networks official in February 2016 (almost a year after the Clinton email network was first revealed) show that Platte River “gave someone access to live HRC archive mailbox at some point.” The same notes show that an email from December 11, 2014, exists that reads “Hillary cover up operation work ticket archive cleanup.” The interviewee said that the “cover up operation” email “probably related to change to 60 day [sic] email retention policy/backup.” The subject indicated that he didn’t “recall the prior policy.” The notes also indicated, “[Redacted] advised [redacted] not to answer questions related to conv [conversation] w/DK [David Kendall] document 49 – based on 5th amendment.”

The subject said that “everyone @ PRN has access to client portal.”



"She can hide but she can't run"



+5 more 
posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 05:38 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Seems kind of like.... obstruction of justice.


+8 more 
posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 05:42 PM
link   
Stevie Wonder can see the Clinton’s are a crime syndicate.

Will anything be done ?

Not if history is any indication.


+17 more 
posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 05:46 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

She conducted herself with deceptive intent, she was being dodgy with her server.

When Comey said she acted carelessly but without intent, the EXACT OPPOSITE was the actual truth.

I'm at the stage (and have been for many many years) that she is as guilty A.F and the corrupted system in the US is still covering for her - a system her, puffin Billy and a whole slew of others have created at the expense of the taxpayer.



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 05:51 PM
link   
DOJ is trying to "wait it out", until the limitation of time for prosecution has passed.



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 06:41 PM
link   
Unfortunetately, it takes forceful judgments and many years to get these cockroaches into the light. Aside from Nunes' criminal referrals, we have this to look forward to.


“In a major victory for accountability, Judge Lamberth today authorized Judicial Watch to take discovery on whether the Clinton email system evaded FOIA and whether the Benghazi scandal was one reason for keeping Mrs. Clinton’s email secret,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Today, Judicial Watch issued document requests and other discovery to the State Department about the Clinton email scandal. Next up, we will begin questioning key witnesses under oath.”

Link


The discovery period will conclude in 120 days, and Judicial Watch said that a post-discovery hearing will be held afterwards to determine whether Judicial Watch can depose Clinton, her former chief of staff Cheryl Mills, and others.

edit on 8-4-2019 by LurkPotato because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 06:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: xuenchen

Seems kind of like.... obstruction of justice.


Obstruction of Justice... like Schiff still saying he has evidence of Russian collusion but won't release it?

Sorry.. my mind wandered there for a minute.

I'm just waiting for the time that the information revealed reaches a tipping point for Democrats.

Not holding my breath tho.




posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 07:07 PM
link   
Tom Fitton is on a roll of late, exposing Deep State corruption and collusion. Perhaps these conniving dirt bags would be prosecuted, if Trump hired Fitton to be in charge of the DOJ.



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 07:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Judicial Watch has received hundreds of pages of FBI documents (per FOIA) that shows some interesting stuff about Hillary's private system.

Seems one of her "contractors" had full access to all email (classified stuff and all) !!

Also looks like a cover-up was ongoing well into 2016.

Somebody needs to re-investigate quick like 😎



Judicial Watch Uncovers ‘Cover-Up’ Discussions in Latest Production of Clinton Email Documents

Judicial Watch announced today that it uncovered 422 pages of FBI documents showing evidence of “cover-up” discussions related to the Clinton email system within Platte River Networks, one of the vendors who managed the Clinton email system. The documents also show Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Charles McCullough forwarding “concerns” about classified information in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The new documents uncovered by Judicial Watch also contain Clinton’s 2009 classified information Non-Disclosure Agreement bearing her signature.

FBI notes of an interview with an unidentified Platte River Networks official in February 2016 (almost a year after the Clinton email network was first revealed) show that Platte River “gave someone access to live HRC archive mailbox at some point.” The same notes show that an email from December 11, 2014, exists that reads “Hillary cover up operation work ticket archive cleanup.” The interviewee said that the “cover up operation” email “probably related to change to 60 day [sic] email retention policy/backup.” The subject indicated that he didn’t “recall the prior policy.” The notes also indicated, “[Redacted] advised [redacted] not to answer questions related to conv [conversation] w/DK [David Kendall] document 49 – based on 5th amendment.”

The subject said that “everyone @ PRN has access to client portal.”



"She can hide but she can't run"



Yeah but the bad orange man......

What utter refuse



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 07:24 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

IAMTAT and I were talking about Platte River employees, "Hillary coverup," back in 2016 along with the fact that any and all of PRN employees had access to her server and anything on it.

All of that came out after Paul 'stonetear' Combetta got caught trying to edit VVIP email archives.

Another thread found where the server went after Platte River, and there's a whole rabbit hole under that too.



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 07:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: xuenchen
Judicial Watch has received hundreds of pages of FBI documents (per FOIA) that shows some interesting stuff about Hillary's private system.

Seems one of her "contractors" had full access to all email (classified stuff and all) !!

Also looks like a cover-up was ongoing well into 2016.

Somebody needs to re-investigate quick like 😎



Judicial Watch Uncovers ‘Cover-Up’ Discussions in Latest Production of Clinton Email Documents

Judicial Watch announced today that it uncovered 422 pages of FBI documents showing evidence of “cover-up” discussions related to the Clinton email system within Platte River Networks, one of the vendors who managed the Clinton email system. The documents also show Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Charles McCullough forwarding “concerns” about classified information in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The new documents uncovered by Judicial Watch also contain Clinton’s 2009 classified information Non-Disclosure Agreement bearing her signature.

FBI notes of an interview with an unidentified Platte River Networks official in February 2016 (almost a year after the Clinton email network was first revealed) show that Platte River “gave someone access to live HRC archive mailbox at some point.” The same notes show that an email from December 11, 2014, exists that reads “Hillary cover up operation work ticket archive cleanup.” The interviewee said that the “cover up operation” email “probably related to change to 60 day [sic] email retention policy/backup.” The subject indicated that he didn’t “recall the prior policy.” The notes also indicated, “[Redacted] advised [redacted] not to answer questions related to conv [conversation] w/DK [David Kendall] document 49 – based on 5th amendment.”

The subject said that “everyone @ PRN has access to client portal.”



"She can hide but she can't run"



Yeah but the bad orange man......

What utter refuse





posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 08:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Judicial Watch has received hundreds of pages of FBI documents (per FOIA) that shows some interesting stuff about Hillary's private system.

Seems one of her "contractors" had full access to all email (classified stuff and all) !!


Gosh! An IT admin with access to the systems they administer. What is the world coming to!


Also looks like a cover-up was ongoing well into 2016.

Somebody needs to re-investigate quick like 😎


But they do.




Judicial Watch Uncovers ‘Cover-Up’ Discussions in Latest Production of Clinton Email Documents

Judicial Watch announced today that it uncovered 422 pages of FBI documents showing evidence of “cover-up” discussions related to the Clinton email system within Platte River Networks, one of the vendors who managed the Clinton email system. The documents also show Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Charles McCullough forwarding “concerns” about classified information in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The new documents uncovered by Judicial Watch also contain Clinton’s 2009 classified information Non-Disclosure Agreement bearing her signature.

FBI notes of an interview with an unidentified Platte River Networks official in February 2016 (almost a year after the Clinton email network was first revealed) show that Platte River “gave someone access to live HRC archive mailbox at some point.” The same notes show that an email from December 11, 2014, exists that reads “Hillary cover up operation work ticket archive cleanup.” The interviewee said that the “cover up operation” email “probably related to change to 60 day [sic] email retention policy/backup.” The subject indicated that he didn’t “recall the prior policy.” The notes also indicated, “[Redacted] advised [redacted] not to answer questions related to conv [conversation] w/DK [David Kendall] document 49 – based on 5th amendment.”

The subject said that “everyone @ PRN has access to client portal.”



"She can hide but she can't run"



I thought that the problem was that the admin didn't change the retention to 60 days as instructed, and therefore the deleted e-mails data was scrubbed later with a generally publicly available, open source and free file cleanup tool called BleachBit rather than waiting for it to be cycled out after 60 days.



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 09:17 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

You do mean the evidence that was under subpoena, correct?

The evidence they bleach-bit and then destroyed the hard drives that contained the evidence?

Those?

Ya... totally legit in your world.

I found this bit particularly funny...


I thought that the problem was that the admin didn't change the retention to 60 days as instructed, and therefore the deleted e-mails data was scrubbed later with a generally publicly available, open source and free file cleanup tool called BleachBit rather than waiting for it to be cycled out after 60 days.


Your mental gymnastics there to justify a failing narrative made me feel sad for you.

She broke several Federal laws.

She should do time for that.

Like every other American citizen has before.

Does New Zealand have a two-tiered justice system too and you're just comfortable with the concept?


edit on 8-4-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2019 @ 11:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut

You do mean the evidence that was under subpoena, correct?


Except that the State Department had already received and had begun reviewing the subpoena'd e-mails several weeks prior to them being supposedly 'deleted'.

Not to mention that, because the retention policy on the email server still hadn't been changed, the mail database would still have all the 'deleted' messages, a fact that the FBI confirmed.

As proof of that, look at the numbers of e-mails released after they had supposedly been erased! How could that be?


The evidence they bleach-bit and then destroyed the hard drives that contained the evidence?


No hard drives were destroyed. The entire e-mail database was recovered.


Those?

Ya... totally legit in your world.

I found this bit particularly funny...


I thought that the problem was that the admin didn't change the retention to 60 days as instructed, and therefore the deleted e-mails data was scrubbed later with a generally publicly available, open source and free file cleanup tool called BleachBit rather than waiting for it to be cycled out after 60 days.


Your mental gymnastics there to justify a failing narrative made me feel sad for you.

She broke several Federal laws.

She should do time for that.

Like every other American citizen has before.

Does New Zealand have a two-tiered justice system too and you're just comfortable with the concept?




I am an IT engineer, familiar with extracting messages from Microsoft Exhange .edb files and can certify that the database file would still have retained the "deleted" e-mail messages.

Again, look at the numbers of e-mails released (or redacted for national security) after they were supposed to have been 'wiped' and then consider how that may be possible if the data was actually wiped and the hard drives destroyed.

The whole thing is such a media beat-up. Clinton used her private server to transact things that should have been done over more secure channels, that is her crime. The e-mails were supposed to have been deleted to ensure they weren't a security threat but as demonstrated by the fact that they were recovered, they weren't deleted from the mail database. Only .pst extracts from email were deleted and overwritten. Stuff in the database may be marked as 'deleted' but the messages remain there, even after database compaction/defragmentation.

Here's a Microsoft Technet article that explains this.

Comey, on November 6, 2016 said that after reviewing the actual e-mails, it was the opinion of the agency that Clinton should not face criminal charges. Even after Comey was replaced, that has not changed. Why?

edit on 8/4/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 9 2019 @ 06:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft




When Comey said she acted carelessly but without intent, the EXACT OPPOSITE was the actual truth.


So true - now will anything come of it?



posted on Apr, 9 2019 @ 07:40 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

The Clinton's are going to be indicted any day now.



posted on Apr, 9 2019 @ 08:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari




She broke several Federal laws.


And yet... the feds dont seem to think so. Only a handful of right wing nuts do.



posted on Apr, 9 2019 @ 08:13 AM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

Sure.....
Any second now.....

hold on they're coming...

There's the door now....
oops it was just a girl scout selling cookies
edit on 492019 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 9 2019 @ 08:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Lumenari




She broke several Federal laws.


And yet... the feds dont seem to think so. Only a handful of right wing nuts do.

Call them nuts.

But Comey said she broke federal laws.....
So there is that

Lol



posted on Apr, 9 2019 @ 09:13 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut




The whole thing is such a media beat-up. Clinton used her private server to transact things that should have been done over more secure channels, that is her crime.

Well at least you admit this.
She should face the law for this the same as anyone else who has done this, right?
www.theguardian.com...


Kristian Saucier, of Arlington, Vermont, appeared in federal court in Bridgeport, where a judge also ordered him to serve six months of home confinement with electronic monitoring during a three-year period of supervised release after the prison time. He pleaded guilty in May to unauthorized detention of defense information and had faced five to six years in prison under federal sentencing guidelines.

all things equal, right?



new topics

top topics



 
46
<<   2 >>

log in

join