It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Moron barmaid AOC once again proves her gross ignorance of US History

page: 9
56
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 10:14 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Are they? Why, oh why, would she dare to deliver what she promised?

So Alexsatanic! Nothing like watching the moron barmaid triggering the whole status quo mob constantly. Good thread!









posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 01:21 PM
link   
And Trump is any better? PLEASE!!

His medical knowledge is nil.
His scientific knowledge is nil.
His history knowledge is nil.

I doubt he can add 2+2

The only thing Trump can talk about with any form of intelligence is himself and his crimes!!

I prefer AOC, at least she is a threat to Trump the AntiChrist and the rogue Republican Party his teflon-coating apostles!!

Trump colluded, Russia has been grooming him for this for years and Putin WILL use him to destroy America as we know it if Trump stays in office!!!

We need a good woman with honor and integrity in the White House. Too bad we need AOC so much where she is. Well, one day, we will see the BEST rags to riches story in American history when she is voted in as POTUS!!!

Time for the elite to pay back to America all the back taxes they should have been paying all along!!

AOC ALL THE WAY!!



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 01:44 PM
link   
a reply to: TruthSeeker50ish




posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 01:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMALLYETALLIAM
I really do not like judging people based on appearance.

However, there is something in AOC's eyes, body language and aura that just does not sit right with me.

It's a psycho/sociopathic vibe that I get from here.

And yes this is purely a speculative opinion.


Agree with you and was thinking the exact same thing. It's those crazy eyes that are always bugging out of her head. That is not normal. There is something wrong with her.



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: TruthSeeker50ish

AOC is that you? You joined to defend your honor?

Show us your crazy eyes



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 02:04 PM
link   
PC culture is reaching its breaking point ! Dems are distancing themselves from AOC and Omar ! This is the death throws of the DNC ! We only hear from this twit , because of her skin tone and her gender ! If AOC was a old W.A.S.P Democratic man ! He would have been shown the door ! The Dems are in big trouble as their party is splitting ! So we now have the beginning of the left extreme green radical nuts vs the looney Christian Right ! Not fun times for pragmatic people ! Tea Party and Green Socialist are the same coin just opposite sides ! Sad stuff
edit on 3-4-2019 by SulfurMercurySalt because: Forgot



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: underpass61

Nope, not about worshiping Trump, its about money.



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 04:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: M5xaz

She is not smart enough to be a barmaid.


AOC gives a bad name to barmaids across the world. But what does that make of the people who voted for her?...



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 04:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: TruthSeeker50ish
And Trump is any better? PLEASE!!

His medical knowledge is nil.
His scientific knowledge is nil.
His history knowledge is nil.

I doubt he can add 2+2

The only thing Trump can talk about with any form of intelligence is himself and his crimes!!

I prefer AOC, at least she is a threat to Trump the AntiChrist and the rogue Republican Party his teflon-coating apostles!!

Trump colluded, Russia has been grooming him for this for years and Putin WILL use him to destroy America as we know it if Trump stays in office!!!

We need a good woman with honor and integrity in the White House. Too bad we need AOC so much where she is. Well, one day, we will see the BEST rags to riches story in American history when she is voted in as POTUS!!!

Time for the elite to pay back to America all the back taxes they should have been paying all along!!

AOC ALL THE WAY!!

The "Green-Eyed Monster" has a hold on another one.



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 04:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: TruthSeeker50ish
And Trump is any better? PLEASE!!

Trump colluded, Russia has been grooming him for this for years and Putin WILL use him to destroy America as we know it if Trump stays in office!!!



So then why is the DNC pushing a Trotskyist Agenda? You seem to believe that Trump is a tool of Russia, but at the same time support a socialist, could you explain why?



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 04:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: M5xaz

She is not smart enough to be a barmaid.


AOC gives a bad name to barmaids across the world. But what does that make of the people who voted for her?...




She gives hope to barmaids across the world that one day they might be as popular and idolised as much as she is, it's no easy feet to go from serving drinks to the very intimate thoughts of so many in such a short timespan.



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 07:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

She gives hope to barmaids across the world that one day they might be as popular and idolised as much as she is, it's no easy feet to go from serving drinks to the very intimate thoughts of so many in such a short timespan.


Oh really, a totally deluded person, AOC, who doesn't know anything about economics or government is giving hope to other totally deluded, and people who are completely ignorant of anything they talk about?...



posted on Apr, 3 2019 @ 08:00 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

So she gives you hope.



posted on Apr, 4 2019 @ 07:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Guyfriday

originally posted by: TruthSeeker50ish
And Trump is any better? PLEASE!!

Trump colluded, Russia has been grooming him for this for years and Putin WILL use him to destroy America as we know it if Trump stays in office!!!



So then why is the DNC pushing a Trotskyist Agenda? You seem to believe that Trump is a tool of Russia, but at the same time support a socialist, could you explain why?


Sure, but you wouldn't catch the drift if someone would try to do so. It's probably financial insecurity sinking IQ levels again, and thus I'll have a hard time to mock you for something you can't do much about.



Sad story.

Trotskyist agenda... it's a good thing you don't sound like Stalin with that! Oh, wait! You do?

edit on 4-4-2019 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 4 2019 @ 09:28 AM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion


So without actually saying why the DNC is pushing a socialist agenda, you call people questioning it poor and dumb. Do you have any idea what is going on, or are you just tossing poo around like a poorly trained monkey?

Very sad story indeed.

You truly believe that last comment, or are you just messing around? It comes off as if you're saying that if anyone doesn't want the world in a state of perpetual conflict (is revolution) then you must be a Stalinist. I'm not sure if you're wrong, confused, or just spouting words.

Maybe you could clear this up by explaining how economic status, intelligence levels, and the socialist agenda that Cortez likes to push is all linked?



posted on Apr, 4 2019 @ 12:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Guyfriday



So without actually saying why the DNC is pushing a socialist agenda, you call people questioning it poor and dumb. Do you have any idea what is going on, or are you just tossing poo around like a poorly trained monkey?


Both, but I've seen worse from rich people. Speak for yourself? He's talking about mindsets, calm down bro. Here's another thread for you to catch the drift:

www.abovetopsecret.com...




if anyone doesn't want the world in a state of perpetual conflict (is revolution) then you must be a Stalinist


Nobody escaped entropy on this plane as of yet, we can only learn to deal with it. Enjoy the ride?

Maybe you explain how the Trotsky label (and your application) doesn't come across a tad Stalinesque? What happened to good old Marxism, wasn't that evil enough to demonize your perceived enemy thoroughly?
However. Could you name a few of her policies and compare them with Trostky in detail? Are you on to something there or just meddling with hot air like the usual spindocs?



posted on Apr, 4 2019 @ 01:47 PM
link   
Imagine having to always attack the intelligence of someone as your worshiped leader says that "Noise causes Cancer"



posted on Apr, 5 2019 @ 12:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Guyfriday

Maybe you explain how the Trotsky label (and your application) doesn't come across a tad Stalinesque? What happened to good old Marxism, wasn't that evil enough to demonize your perceived enemy thoroughly?
However. Could you name a few of her policies and compare them with Trostky in detail? Are you on to something there or just meddling with hot air like the usual spindocs?



From: merriam-webster.com


Definition of Trotskyism
: the political, economic, and social principles advocated by Trotsky
especially : the theory and practice of communism developed by or associated with Trotsky and usually including adherence to the concept of worldwide revolution as opposed to socialism in one country



From: merriam-webster.com


Definition of Stalinism
: the political, economic, and social principles and policies associated with Stalin
especially : the theory and practice of communism developed by Stalin from Marxism-Leninism and marked especially by rigid authoritarianism, widespread use of terror, and often emphasis on Russian nationalism



From: merriam-webster.com


Definition of Marxism
: the political, economic, and social principles and policies advocated by Marx
especially : a theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society



SO why the Trotskyist label? Well there is this element that's been working it's way throught the political and social strata in this country for a while and has recently been pushing very hard for a complete rewriting of the idea's that democracy is emphasized under. It's a group that you might have heard about before, it's name is "Socialist Alternative".

Here's is a brief overview for the WIKI


Socialist Alternative (SA) is a Trotskyist political party in the United States. It describes itself as "a national organization fighting in our workplaces, communities, and campuses against the exploitation and injustices people face every day" and "a community of activists fighting against budget cuts in public services; fighting for living wage jobs and militant, democratic unions; and people of all colors speaking out against racism and attacks on immigrants, students organizing against tuition hikes and war, women and men fighting sexism and homophobia


ANd it sounds good, but the reality of it that they push a very Trotskyist agenda. That is to say that they focus on dispurtive behavor that has the sole aim or forcing conflict and disorder. I have seen with in my community up here in Washington State, where these member have created riots, promoted hate crimes, and encouraged public endangerment all while sitting in the safety of political comfort. They state that they are there for the people, but their actions are always pushing for a state of permanent revolution.

Also from WIKI


Trotsky's conception of Permanent Revolution is based on his understanding, drawing on the work of fellow Russian Alexander Parvus, that a Marxist analysis of events began with the international level of development, both economic and social. National peculiarities are only an expression of the contradictions in the world system. According to this perspective, the tasks of the Bourgeois Democratic Revolution could not be achieved by the bourgeoisie itself in a reactionary period of world capitalism. The situation in the backward and colonial countries, particularly Russia, bore this out. This conception was first developed in the essays later collected in his book 1905 and in his essay Results and Prospects, and later developed in his 1929 book, The Permanent Revolution.

The basic idea of Trotsky's theory is that in Russia the bourgeoisie would not carry out a thorough revolution which would institute political democracy and solve the land question. These measures were assumed to be essential to develop Russia economically. Therefore, it was argued the future revolution must be led by the proletariat who would not only carry through the tasks of the Bourgeois Democratic Revolution but would commence a struggle to surpass the bourgeois democratic revolution.

How far the proletariat would be able to travel upon that road would depend upon the further course of events and not upon the designation of the revolution as "Bourgeois Democratic". In this sense the revolution would be made permanent. Trotsky believed that a new workers' state would not be able to hold out against the pressures of a hostile capitalist world unless socialist revolutions quickly took hold in other countries as well. This theory was advanced in opposition to the position held by the Stalinist faction within the Bolshevik Party that "socialism in one country" could be built in the Soviet Union.

Trotsky's theory was developed in opposition to the Social Democratic theory that undeveloped countries must pass through two distinct revolutions. First the Bourgeois Democratic Revolution, which socialists would assist, and at a later stage, the Socialist Revolution with an evolutionary period of capitalist development separating those stages. This is often referred to as the Theory of Stages, the Two Stage Theory or Stagism.


***THE ABOVE TEXTS WAS EDITED BY ME FOR READIBLITY***



I believe, from I have be witness to, that this Trotskyist movement is hiding it's self in the cloak of "Democratic Socialism" in order to misrepresent it's true intentions. You don't have to believe what I say, all you need to do is watch the people that are saying that socialism is good. Compare what they announce to what they personally are taking, then think about who they say they are vs what they act like.


As to what her policies are that point to Cortez being in league with this movement, well there is the "New Green Deal" that she was, and still is, pushing for. She is also already using fear to try and further her agenda (not so sutle we're all doomed in 12 years). I could go on, but I had a longer day then normal so I may come back and talk more about this tomorrow if it's needed. As it is I think I answered your points you asked about. Sorry about the poorly trained monkey comment, the day started out heading in a long direction, and you video was pretty petty in the way it is framed. Oh well for both of us, the edit window has closed so we both just to own what we posted.



posted on Apr, 5 2019 @ 09:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Guyfriday

It's the mud-pit after all, gotta love a good surprise in form of a well thought out reply like that! Kudos to you.



ANd it sounds good, but the reality of it that they push a very Trotskyist agenda. That is to say that they focus on dispurtive behavor that has the sole aim or forcing conflict and disorder.


This part made me giggle a bit, to be honest.

It's not the case that said disruptive behavior comes along without any purpose, which could be described as a ground-shaking event to safe the fcking species and the status quo. You know what happens to the Arctic, right? This is precisely why it sounds good btw.
Furthermore, a merely disruptive approach is what keeps big companies afloat when they take over the competition, you simply need to do that in case you wanna cash in on profit afterwards.
"You've gotta break a few eggs for an omelette."

But that doesn't mean I'd argue for total destruction, nor does the green deal. Nuance, please?



How far the proletariat would be able to travel upon that road would depend upon the further course of events and not upon the designation of the revolution as "Bourgeois Democratic". In this sense the revolution would be made permanent. Trotsky believed that a new workers' state would not be able to hold out against the pressures of a hostile capitalist world unless socialist revolutions quickly took hold in other countries as well. This theory was advanced in opposition to the position held by the Stalinist faction within the Bolshevik Party that "socialism in one country" could be built in the Soviet Union.


To add: they/ he expected said revolution to take hold in further industrialized nations like Germany, for example. And with regards to the crushed Spartacus revolution and the Cold War, I'd say he was right on the money with his pessimistic outlook.



edit on 5-4-2019 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
56
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join