It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
How can I condone it when the video doesn't even give any contexts of what's actually going on? For all anyone can tell, that could've been the young dudes sign and it was the old dude trying to snatch it.
Because you are looking for excuses to justify it.
Because it's your ideology that is doing it.
So you feel the need to rationalize it away instead of just realizing what it is that your ideology is capable of and having an introspective moment.
My "ideology" dictates that the majority of people are just petty simpletons in general, no matter what their political leaning is.
So I really have no need to "justify" or "rationalize" anyone's actions.
I just call it how I see it.
we can strike back against Planned Parenthood hit in them in the pocketbook
we won this game before
If leftist garbage
originally posted by: olaru12
Since we all have our broad brushes out and paint progressives with one incident.
I think this is a great representation of conservative Republicans and their deviant sexual ideology. You know who you are....
www.rawstory.com...
I have other examples if you want to see them....perfect examples of Republican family values!!!
one incident
organizations that are antithetical to American values
no Constitutional right to have taxpayers fund abortions, healthcare, education or any other sorry excuse for a monetary black hole
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
originally posted by: olaru12
Since we all have our broad brushes out and paint progressives with one incident.
...
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
...
originally posted by: olaru12
Since we all have our broad brushes out and paint progressives with one incident.
I think this is a great representation of conservative Republicans and their deviant sexual ideology. You know who you are....
www.rawstory.com...
I have other examples if you want to see them....perfect examples of Republican family values!!!
Yet you ignore the following American value.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
originally posted by: pthena
Well that seems to be rather awkward!
This is your thread so I shouldn't fear that you are drifting off topic.
originally posted by: pthena
I don't take Jefferson to be an inerrant arbiter of truth. I freely disagree with him at times, fully cognizant of the sad circumstance that we are not living contemporaries who may ask for clarifications about unclear phrases.
originally posted by: pthena
For instance what exactly does "unalienable Rights" even mean? Are we to think that we are endowed with immortality? I see no evidence to support such a notion. On the contrary, in fact, I have seen many people die. I have seen evidence that people can and do alienate other people of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. I conclude then that these are not "unalienable rights."
unalienable
Also found in: Thesaurus, Legal, Wikipedia.
un·al·ien·a·ble (ŭn-āl′yə-nə-bəl, -ā′lē-ə-)
adj.
Not to be separated, given away, or taken away; inalienable: "All of them ... claim unalienable dignity as individuals"
...
originally posted by: pthena
We can attempt to secure these rights through Governments. We should keep in mind though that the righteous attempt is no guarantee of success. People will still die. People will be held in bondage. People will be prevented from pursuing happiness. Of these three, The pursuit of happiness in the hearts and minds of people is the most resilient. For even in bondage humans can dream of better, happier circumstances.
...
If we followed your logical fallacy then since we cannot guarantee any rights, then none should be protected at all... Not to mention the fact that "you" are choosing what rights should be disregarded, and what rights shouldn't be.
There are laws which protect life. If someone murders another person there are laws that will take away the liberty of the murderer for taking a life...
Abortion is in fact genocide,
democrats have made infanticide legal.
We keep seeing these violent acts from many in the far left, and left-wing politicians/leaders have been in fact consenting and instigating such behavior and criminal actions against others simply because of "political difference."