It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An innate right can not rely on someone else to provide something for you.
If equality worked how you claim it does then private schools would be illegal.
Now stop dodging my question, since you are for equality, since some people in America are allowed access to machine guns, we all should, right?
You have the right to defend yourself which is what the 2nd is all about. Notice that it does not guarantee you weapon as if it provides you a gun. It only guarantees you your right to keep and bear arms without that right being infringed on.
Again, no one is being forced to build or provide roads.
Public servants aren't slaves currently in that they voluntarily seek their jobs.
my right to have equal access to machine guns is being violated, right?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha and/or purchase an AK47!
The law doesn't give me jack.
I have the right to defend myself simply because I'm a freakin' human being. All the COTUS does is re-affirm that along with other unalienable rights.
I suppose if you hold that the law is what giveth and taketh, then you agree that slavery is perfectly legit if we should choose to codify it into law again?
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: jacobe001
Is that the average of all products including the ones that fail and never see the market?