It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Greenland Glacier Starts Growing Again..Does It Prove Global Warming Theory A Myth?

page: 7
22
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 31 2019 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

Yeah - I know how it works(ed).

Chery picked scientists from thousands to make a "97% said" claim.
Propaganda.
Attacks on people who ask questions.
The gravy train of grants.
The people get screwed with higher taxes/costs

Enjoy your religion. Fortunately, less people seem to follow your cult these days...and no, the world isn't ending in 12 years.

When your priests stop manipulating data - including changing historical data - let me know.


Man made global warming that will kill us all, Niburu, Russian Collusion, Big Foot, Gay Frogs, Lizard people - all the same nonsensical hysteria.

edit on 31/3/2019 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 31 2019 @ 02:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: whywhynot

Sure. And animals have gone extinct.

Personally I think the general devastation of habitat is the real concern. When we have monocropped and devastated wildlife and disease or famine run wild our ability to rebound will be very limited.
Sure animals have gone extinct including dinosaurs. Recall from your grade school science class that dinosaurs lived in an age before humans and did not die off because of humans.



posted on Mar, 31 2019 @ 03:12 PM
link   
The current Solar Minimum is likely affecting the glacier and our climate www.nextbigfuture.com...



posted on Mar, 31 2019 @ 03:34 PM
link   
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus




The current Solar Minimum is likely affecting the glacier and our climate
Did the previous Solar minimum (2009) have the same effect? Did it cause a glacier in Greenland to begin to regrow? The sunspot number was really low then.
www.abc.net.au...

Doesn't seem to have cooled much of anything.


edit on 3/31/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 09:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: whywhynot

Sure. And animals have gone extinct.

Personally I think the general devastation of habitat is the real concern. When we have monocropped and devastated wildlife and disease or famine run wild our ability to rebound will be very limited.
Sure animals have gone extinct including dinosaurs. Recall from your grade school science class that dinosaurs lived in an age before humans and did not die off because of humans.


Dinosaurs continuously evolved for hundreds of millions of years. Today their survivors are reduced to alligator family, lizard family, bird family. Dinosaur species died out continuously over millions of year. Species come and go all the time.



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 09:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus




The current Solar Minimum is likely affecting the glacier and our climate
Did the previous Solar minimum (2009) have the same effect? Did it cause a glacier in Greenland to begin to regrow? The sunspot number was really low then.
www.abc.net.au...

Doesn't seem to have cooled much of anything.



Today's temperatures are puny compared to medieval warm period. Medieval warm period was a full degree C warmer than today. Much of Greenland was covered in grassland.



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 09:16 PM
link   
a reply to: AdamEarthHeiman

Yes. Greenland, like Europe, seems to have been warmer during the MWP than it was later on. The Vikings were able to do some farming there, for a while, apparently.


However, more recent temperatures in Greenland seem to be warmer than they were during the MWP. Warmer even, perhaps, than the Roman and Minoan periods.
Here is the GISP2 ice core data and the MWP can be clearly seen, added, are actual observed temperatures from 2009.
www.skepticalscience.com...


In any case, as has been pointed out, using a location which has a climate highly susceptible to marine influence is not a good gauge for global temperatures, ancient or current, and what happened 1,000 years ago doesn't have much to do with what's happening now.
edit on 4/1/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 6 2019 @ 07:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

So if climates with marine influence are not good gauges, why then is everyone looking directly at those areas.

LoL.

Seems, is not good enough, imaginations are running wild and what happened a thousand years has EVERYTHING to do with what is happening now.

Why look at ice cores and claim anyone can accurately tell us the dates of said ice when it cannot be mapped properly from even 10 years ago.

These models you pray too, are just that, models.

They are inaccurate and use biased, flawed, incomplete and also as tainted as any datasets are.

The algorithms used have been incorrect across the board, and yet get used again and again.

These climate scientists are either really stupid or not allowed to properly and fully look at all possibilities.

Maybe in another 500 years at this point they will start coming close.

Meanwhile, soon your carbon taxes are gonna be thrown out on there keister's by some people demanding absolute proof.

The trustful sheep are not going to stop them, got no chance at all.



posted on Apr, 6 2019 @ 08:06 PM
link   
a reply to: ParasuvO




So if climates with marine influence are not good gauges, why then is everyone looking directly at those areas.
Everyone isn't. But some people are thinking that because there is a growing glacier there, it means there is no global warming.

edit on 4/6/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join