It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: trustmeimdoctor
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed Can you show me where there is a clear consensus on these obstruction of justice laws? It seems to me they may be applied without another crime being commited, but the law seems vague and open to interpretation at the same time.
originally posted by: trustmeimdoctor
a reply to: RadioRobert
It's disturbing how fast you can become one of those people on either side of the fence these days.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Has anyone specifically stated exactly how he obstructed justice?
Even james comey testified under oath to congress that trump had not effected the rusha investigation.
And comey hates the president.
So I wonder how they're going to spin this Investigation fail to make it Trumps fault?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Has anyone specifically stated exactly how he obstructed justice?
Even james comey testified under oath to congress that trump had not effected the rusha investigation.
And comey hates the president.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
What we can say is that Trump and his campaign staff repeatedly lied to the FBI, Congress and the American people and Russia knew they were lying.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
That makes Trump and his campaign staff compromised as hell.
...
originally posted by: RadioRobert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Has anyone specifically stated exactly how he obstructed justice?
Even james comey testified under oath to congress that trump had not effected the rusha investigation.
And comey hates the president.
I can imagine all sorts of things that might constitute weak evidence. The problem they would have is assigning improper motive. Good luck with that jazz.
Source: thehill.com...
The head of the House Judiciary Committee said Wednesday he is worried Attorney General William Barr will not meet Democrats' deadline to turn over the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller's probe.
"I am very concerned that it is apparent that the Department [of Justice] will not meet the April 2 deadline that we set, and I’m very disturbed by that," Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) told reporters Wednesday evening.
"I asked him when we would see it, and he couldn’t get specific. He said weeks, not months, as we’ve heard before," he added.
Nadler, who insisted the early April date is a hard deadline, would not commit to whether he would immediately use a subpoena to compel Barr to provide the documents — though Democrats have threatened to use such power if their requests are not satisfied.
"We will wait until after April 2nd, and we will make those decisions," he said.
Nadler said Barr committed to testifying before his panel during a roughly 10-minute phone call earlier Wednesday, though the timing of any appearance by the attorney general on Capitol Hill is unclear. Nadler told reporters it would be "reasonably soon."
The attorney general on Wednesday also described the length of Mueller's report that he filed with the Justice Department last week as "substantial," according to Nadler.
The chairman said that added to his concerns about Barr's summary report of the probe released to lawmakers on Sunday.
"He told me it was a 'very substantial report' — one that, in my judgment, a four-page summary would not begin to do justice to," Nadler said.
"It is unacceptable if the Congress and the people don’t see the full report, and he wouldn’t commit to that. And we are not happy about that, to put it mildly," Nadler said.
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: carewemust
Trump needs to take the gloves off.
Mueller report is in.
Time to DECLASS the FISA info Mr. President.
#Declass
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: RadioRobert
So that would be a no?
Seems a lot of hullabaloo over something that can't be described.
Almost as if it is more opinion than fact?