It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 1point92AU
Oh yeah and to all the leftist shills who will no doubt bombard this thread with remarks about Islamophobia, etc, please do me a favor and go visit most of the middle eastern cities where Islam is the predominate religion (specifically under Sharia Law) and play your call to prayer and let us know how it turns out for you.
So just set back and let it become like most Islamic nations?
originally posted by: UKTruth
It's all good if everyone is treated the same, unfortunately that is not the case.
"Nobody wants to listen to you" says the policeman.
Man arrested in Perth, Scotland for preaching.
A group of academics has called for religious freedom to be fully recognised in Scotland. A new paper on Religious Freedom in Scotland offers a legal contribution to the debate. It outlines the protections contained in international and European legal instruments and in national constitutions. The paper also makes a set of proposals for ensuring the protection of religious freedom in Scotland.
originally posted by: Dr UAE
a reply to: 1point92AU
if its so offensive to you then call for a petition or something similar to stop it
its not like calling for war, its just a call to Muslims to pray
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Sheye
Events planned this year for Trafalgar Square.
1. The Passion of Jesus. 19th April.
2. The Feast of St. George. 20th April.
3. Vaisakhi Festival. 27th April.
4. Pride in London Parade. 6th July.
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: UKTruth
I know that you fool.
I was pointing out the one from Scotland which is totally irrelevant.
The case of Smith v Donnelly  SCCR 800 is the leading case on the definition of breach of the peace in Scotland. In particular, it was held that “what is required to constitute the crime is conduct severe enough to cause alarm to ordinary people and threaten serious disturbance to the community.” It also states that “something substantially greater than mere irritation is involved,” adding that “what is required…is conduct which does present as genuinely alarming and disturbing, in its context, to any reasonable person”.
Because of the limitations inherent in the common law crime of breach of
the peace a new statutory offence of Threatening or abusive behaviour was
enacted in the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010, Section
38. While it is hoped that no street preaching would objectively qualify as
either threatening or abusive, you should take particular care in discussion of sensitive subjects.
Prosecuting authorities now appear to favour the use of Section 38 to tackle
any sort of behaviour in the street which causes a disturbance. The boundaries are perhaps a bit clearer and it is easier for prosecutors to prove. Most behaviour which would qualify as breach of the peace would also fall within Section 38.
In terms of that section it is an offence if:
1. 'A' behaves in a threatening or abusive manner and
2. The behaviour would be likely to cause a reasonable person to suffer fear or alarm and
3. 'A' intends to cause fear or alarm or is reckless as to whether the behaviour would cause fear or alarm.
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: highvein
Vote for laws of separation of church and state.
Just look at how it has stopped many western nations from religion seeping into politics around the world. Neutral laws, that focus on the individuals freedoms like what we see in Canada, USA, Australia, Scandinavian nations, etc, etc. allow people to practice their own religions, but not allow them to get into politics.
But with the current rise of atheism in the UK, I can bet most second or third gen immigrants from Islamic nations it won't stand a chance. I went to school with a guy who was Muslim, and he would pray twice a day at school for a while, in our school chapel, (went to catholic highschool) eventually he just stopped, because he was the only person doing it, and his father stopped, for basically the same thing. It just looked awkward especially when you have such a diverse and multicultural nation like Canada.
Just from what I have heard or seen from different sites, with no go zones and such, it seems to be happening.