It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I'll tell ya, it's freeing not having allegiance to one side or the other. Call all the snakes what they are- snakes, liberating.
is that what you call it?
phony comparisons to make both look the same only make you look phony.
All of our officials need to be held accountable.
Funny some only want to start today.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I'll tell ya, it's freeing not having allegiance to one side or the other. Call all the snakes what they are- snakes, liberating.
is that what you call it?
phony comparisons to make both look the same only make you look phony.
All of our officials need to be held accountable.
Funny some only want to start today.
Yes the "both sides are bad" argument is getting tiring, especially in light of recent events.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I'll tell ya, it's freeing not having allegiance to one side or the other. Call all the snakes what they are- snakes, liberating.
is that what you call it?
phony comparisons to make both look the same only make you look phony.
All of our officials need to be held accountable.
Funny some only want to start today.
Yes the "both sides are bad" argument is getting tiring, especially in light of recent events.
Yea, individuality is sooo 1700's.
If you want to be cool, there is two clubs, gotta pick one.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I'll tell ya, it's freeing not having allegiance to one side or the other. Call all the snakes what they are- snakes, liberating.
is that what you call it?
phony comparisons to make both look the same only make you look phony.
All of our officials need to be held accountable.
Funny some only want to start today.
Yes the "both sides are bad" argument is getting tiring, especially in light of recent events.
Yea, individuality is sooo 1700's.
If you want to be cool, there is two clubs, gotta pick one.
If you have to keep telling yourself "both sides are just as bad" to retain your individuality, that's fine. But it is simply untrue.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I'll tell ya, it's freeing not having allegiance to one side or the other. Call all the snakes what they are- snakes, liberating.
is that what you call it?
phony comparisons to make both look the same only make you look phony.
All of our officials need to be held accountable.
Funny some only want to start today.
Yes the "both sides are bad" argument is getting tiring, especially in light of recent events.
Yea, individuality is sooo 1700's.
If you want to be cool, there is two clubs, gotta pick one.
If you have to keep telling yourself "both sides are just as bad" to retain your individuality, that's fine. But it is simply untrue.
Both parties are bad, either will cut off the nose to spite the face. You're welcome to the idea that one side is worse, and in today's climate I'd agree.
I don't see either making concerted efforts to end the wars and prevent new ones though. I don't see either trying to address problems that too many Americans are going through.
All I see is lip service and political volleys.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I'll tell ya, it's freeing not having allegiance to one side or the other. Call all the snakes what they are- snakes, liberating.
is that what you call it?
phony comparisons to make both look the same only make you look phony.
All of our officials need to be held accountable.
Funny some only want to start today.
Yes the "both sides are bad" argument is getting tiring, especially in light of recent events.
Yea, individuality is sooo 1700's.
If you want to be cool, there is two clubs, gotta pick one.
If you have to keep telling yourself "both sides are just as bad" to retain your individuality, that's fine. But it is simply untrue.
Both parties are bad, either will cut off the nose to spite the face. You're welcome to the idea that one side is worse, and in today's climate I'd agree.
I don't see either making concerted efforts to end the wars and prevent new ones though. I don't see either trying to address problems that too many Americans are going through.
All I see is lip service and political volleys.
If one party is worse, do you side with the worse party, the better party, or dismiss them both equally?
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Tartuffe
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I'll tell ya, it's freeing not having allegiance to one side or the other. Call all the snakes what they are- snakes, liberating.
is that what you call it?
phony comparisons to make both look the same only make you look phony.
All of our officials need to be held accountable.
Funny some only want to start today.
Yes the "both sides are bad" argument is getting tiring, especially in light of recent events.
Yea, individuality is sooo 1700's.
If you want to be cool, there is two clubs, gotta pick one.
If you have to keep telling yourself "both sides are just as bad" to retain your individuality, that's fine. But it is simply untrue.
Both parties are bad, either will cut off the nose to spite the face. You're welcome to the idea that one side is worse, and in today's climate I'd agree.
I don't see either making concerted efforts to end the wars and prevent new ones though. I don't see either trying to address problems that too many Americans are going through.
All I see is lip service and political volleys.
If one party is worse, do you side with the worse party, the better party, or dismiss them both equally?
If you live in a small town and have only two restaurants, but you dislike them both... Eat at home.
Both of the parties' campaigns are funded by the same people.... Those are investments, not donations. They're the same party.
The similarities far outnumber the differences.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Tartuffe
I get your argument and I've heard it before.
I just hate it, and I'll never conform to it. I won't sacrifice what I believe "for the lesser of two evils".
One may be lesser, but they're both evil. Both sides have had a good one stand out here and there throughout history, but that's rare.
Maybe Trump will be a good one, we'll see, it's only been two years. But I'm going to be critical of him. I'll say what I like and don't like. I just don't understand how some can give blind loyalty and swap positions just as fast as their politicians.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I'll tell ya, it's freeing not having allegiance to one side or the other. Call all the snakes what they are- snakes, liberating.
is that what you call it?
phony comparisons to make both look the same only make you look phony.
All of our officials need to be held accountable.
Funny some only want to start today.
I've always said Hillary should be held accountable for her crimes, Trump however won and said he wasn't going after her.
That said, he's running the government now, not her....
So maybe you find it odd that I focus on those running the show, but that just seems natural to me.
originally posted by: lakenheath24
1. Congressional term limits. No more than 8 years.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: shooterbrody
I didn't say they passed classified information.
Merely I pointed out their efforts to circumvent FOIA by not having communications on government channels.
What wrong with asking for transparency from all the players and not exempting the ones you decide?
originally posted by: Lab4Us
a reply to: CriticalStinker
ATS doesn’t have liberals? Did they all quit today?