It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It's Time. Just Say It-- "Trump Did NOT Collude With The Russians"

page: 10
102
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 08:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Lefties...it's been fun, but it's now official... You...were...wrong.


"DONALD TRUMP DID NOT COLLUDE WITH THE RUSSIANS...HE HAS BEEN VINDICATED."





I still think he probably did though

Thanks
That is awesome




posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 08:52 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT



Lefties...it's been fun, but it's now official... You...were...wrong. It's okay to just admit it...confession being good for the soul, and all that. Donald J. Trump DID NOT collude with the Russians. THAT is REALITY...as stated by Special Council, Robert Mueller the third.





posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 08:58 AM
link   
Ok, Trump DID NOT collude with Russia.

But if you need cheap concrete, he "knows a guy".



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 09:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Lefties...it's been fun, but it's now official... You...were...wrong.


"DONALD TRUMP DID NOT COLLUDE WITH THE RUSSIANS...HE HAS BEEN VINDICATED."





I still think he probably did though





posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 10:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Lefties...it's been fun, but it's now official... You...were...wrong.


"DONALD TRUMP DID NOT COLLUDE WITH THE RUSSIANS...HE HAS BEEN VINDICATED."





I still think he probably did though




COOL.

So Mueller was just wasting two years and 30 million dollars.



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 10:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Lefties...it's been fun, but it's now official... You...were...wrong.


"DONALD TRUMP DID NOT COLLUDE WITH THE RUSSIANS...HE HAS BEEN VINDICATED."





I still think he probably did though


Based on sophisticated legal methods too I bet




posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 10:49 AM
link   
If the report proves the man is innocent, and did not do such, then why are there active efforts to block the releasing of the report?

What all is in the report, that is so damming that the public can not see it?

The only real way to put this to the end, would be to release the full unaltered, un redacted report, held by Mueller with Barr and Rosenstein behind the Mueller, swearing under penalty of prison that it is the report fully and completely.



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: carewemust

The absolute denial is astounding. They don't believe it. They really think the AG and DAG (the man who appointed mueller) are lying about the reports findings. I guess it should be expected that they need to go through the stages of grief after losing the entirety of their narrative in one weekend.


"We still haven't heard from Mueller. We've only heard from Trump's hand-picked appointee. We don't know what Mueller really found. We have the makings of a cover up. We need the report."

I heard a few minor variations of this yesterday. From politicians and pundits. What's really funny is that in order for that implication to be true, one must actually believe that Barr (who has worked with Mueller in the DOJ years ago) has subverted justice and is lying about the report 's findings, AND that Bob Mueller (and his team) are silently shaking their heads at home instead of calling CNN and MSNBC and saying, "Hey, now! Wait a goshdarn minute-- that's not what the report says! We recommended charges for 14 members of the campaign staff and administration! We have mountains of evidence of collusion and wrongdoing!"

Talk about a conspiracy theory and cognitive dissonance!
edit on 26-3-2019 by RadioRobert because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 01:03 PM
link   
Think maybe the vig is past due for most of the Dems trying to oust Trump? Did they go all-in and sell liens against their souls on November 6th 2016?
Is that a fair explanation of why this won't end?



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 03:42 PM
link   

Like the guy who claimed he never had any dealings with Russia?

The guy who doesn’t know Felix Sater?

The guy who said he was going to sue all of the women he said were lying about sexual assault and affairs?

The guy who said he DID fire Comey because of Russia and then said he didn’t?

The guy who dictated a letter saying his son met with Russians about orphans not dirty campaign tricks?

The guy who spent 4years claiming the first black president had no American birth certificate?


Like the guy who claimed he never had any dealings with Russia? - Any ILLEGAL dealings, correct. Business/personal/private dealings are perfectly legal and acceptable, and very much the "norm"

The guy who doesn’t know Felix Sater? - AKA a businessman from Russia? Again, business/personal/private dealings were never the subject, only unlawful coordination with the Government of Russia which is thoroughly and completely debunked

The guy who said he was going to sue all of the women he said were lying about sexual assault and affairs? - Yes, well that is the proper way to handle defamation cases. Especially when accusers make big claims but offer exactly nothing to back those claims up. Allegations are FALSE until proven otherwise by the accuser. That is the starting position we are operating from. It is akin to "You didn't prove this happened, change my mind"

The guy who said he DID fire Comey because of Russia and then said he didn’t? - Yes, again because Comey was intentionally casting doubt in public while telling him in private he was not the subject of the investigation. He merely wanted his subordinate employee - Comey - to publicly state what he was telling POTUS in private. That Trump WAS NOT the subject of the investigation period. He fired him when he continued saying one thing and then running to CNN and other cuck-bag media to spread rumors to harm POTUS

The guy who dictated a letter saying his son met with Russians about orphans not dirty campaign tricks? - Tomatoe tomato, Hillary conspired with both Brits and Russians with her dirty campaign tricks. Getting dirt on a political opponent is standard operating procedure nothing unusual there. Their hero "Bulletproof Bob" Mueller AKA Eliot Ness AKA Super Man agrees with this assessment

The guy who spent 4years claiming the first black president had no American birth certificate - Because Obama's own family claimed he was a Kenyan born in Kenya not the United States. Until we saw the birth certificate, there was no way to be certain our President was actually a native born American (which non-native born Americans do not qualify for POTUS). Who the heck wants some Kenyan born person leading the free world? Not I, that is for certain. Besides, Hillary started the whole birth certificate issue when Obama creamed her in the 2008 primaries.

And I'll just end with this....3 failed Presidential bids
Clinton is the laughing stock of US politics. Sadly I thought her Husband was a halfway decent President and it is clear Chelsea Clinton (a private citizen) is also worthy of some respect. But Hillary? A abject and provable failure, having nothing to offer but her own interest in peddling influence and cashing in on Bill's name/reputation



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: sdcigarpig

But it has already come to an end. No serious person is still pushing this discredited hunk of trash and those who are simply play even further into our hands by doubling down on discredited nonsense.

Voters are going to punish Dems severely in 2020 for this.



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's done. Over. Let's just let it go already.

But of course the right wing fanatics won't let it go, they will keep flapping their gums ad nauseum, because the left.

The left does this, the right does that-its over. Enough with the ill informed over opinionated crap. Trump has been exonerated, end of story.

It still doesn't make Trump any less a Richard Cranium, but he's in the clear. Finally maybe some folk will STFU and just let it effin go.



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 06:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's done. Over. Let's just let it go already.

But of course the right wing fanatics won't let it go, they will keep flapping their gums ad nauseum, because the left.

The left does this, the right does that-its over. Enough with the ill informed over opinionated crap. Trump has been exonerated, end of story.

It still doesn't make Trump any less a Richard Cranium, but he's in the clear. Finally maybe some folk will STFU and just let it effin go.



Now, doesn't that feel much better?

Thanks for steppin' to the plate.



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 08:43 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

From the get go, I have maintained that Trump needed the investigation, that it needed to be released to the public to see. Now the investigation is done, and those who are not wanting to release it, and the question is why not?

When President Clinton was under investigation, the entire report was released and all could see this. So what is the difference now? Even Nixon, the report that was done on him was released and people can read it fully.

We paid for this, we watched this go on, and now we should see what all the fuss was about and the full report needs to be released. If it is stalled by the Republicans, then it only will give fuel that there is far worse in this report and ultimately that Trump really is guilty of far worse crimes than the ones he skirts on a regular basis.



posted on Mar, 26 2019 @ 08:53 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Really they are going to punish Dems severely in 2020, just for this one thing?

What about 2018? After all the investigation was ongoing during that time frame, why not then and then bring it to a halt?

Or could it have been that the person on the street really wanted to know if the President was or was not guilty?

That same argument was used back in 1972.

The lesson from history here would be to release the report and come clean, and then move on, than hide it and it become a bigger problem in the future.



posted on Mar, 27 2019 @ 01:57 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Can we have more aggressions for those "Russian Aggressions" now? Crimea Culpa.

But whatabout AIPAC?


The Electronic Intifada has obtained a complete copy of The Lobby – USA, a four-part undercover investigation by Al Jazeera into Israel’s covert influence campaign in the United States.

electronicintifada.net...

Oh, wait! Israel?
Nah. You better stick to the non-collusive part from Russia with love cuz ... Leftists!




posted on Mar, 27 2019 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns




Voters are going to punish Dems severely in 2020 for this.


No they won't. The American voter is only interested in the economy and how it affect them. And health care.


edit on 27-3-2019 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 27 2019 @ 05:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Thecakeisalie
Fair is fair.
The left flapped their gums, lips and tongues for over two years.... about a hoax.



posted on Mar, 28 2019 @ 10:18 AM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Not when Dems keep doubling down on debunked nonsense

Nobody wants a bunch of children running the show, who cry when they don't get their way and bury their heads in the sand

Mueller: "No collusion so obviously no obstruction"
Dems: "No! Its not true! Collusion is true! Schiff and Watters and Maddow told us so!"


And FYI, our economy is doing great. Incumbents generally get re-elected when the economy is doing well. But things have changed, US voters care about truth and integrity..and Dems doubling down on a debunked paranoid myth is the opposite of integrity

You must think this debunked Russia hoax is just going away? We aren't going to let it go away. And once the arrests start coming down for the treasonous conspirators in this plot, it will be front page news every day.
edit on 3/28/2019 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 29 2019 @ 12:58 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's interesting that while the media have to admit there's nothing to pin on him they still dump on Trump like the hypocritical idiots they really are. That alone builds support fro him as people don't like the media. The media are actually fuelling the next win for Trump




top topics



 
102
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join