It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lab4Us
You all do realize that the exercise here (in nonstop Congressional investigations into Trump and his family) is to make sure another non-Pol NEVER dare run for President again. They want to make sure we know who controls the narrative and what will happen to any of us non-Pols who ever dare throw their hat into the ring for President.
Notice they never investigate Pols to this degree!
originally posted by: stosh64
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: ausername
originally posted by: Assassin82
a reply to: ausername
Yeah, I've read that. And I believe they will. But to what end? How many more setback can the left suffer in this witch hunt?
CNN saying no evidence of collusion, obstruction but it doesn't exonerate Trump.
That's what they're all going with. It's almost as if someone told them what to say... *cough* DNC propaganda *cough*
Didn't all the Dems have an emergency 3pm meeting yesterday?
Emergency talking points were handed out, they had to break the 4am talking point schedule.
originally posted by: Pyle
1.
It will be damn interesting to see how all those connections to the Russian government, lies about those connections, lies about having a deal to make a tower in Moscow, lies about the Trump tower meeting, Manafort giving polling data, ect. are characterized by Mueller if he even looked into everything, considering how narrow even the summary letter is he might not have.
2.
Related to number 1 found in a footnote.
In assessing potential conspiracy charges, the Special Counsel also considered whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated with Russian election interference activities. The Special Counsel defined coordination as an "agreement" -tacit or express- between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference.
Seems like a little bit of wiggle room for people to not conspire illegally but still did stuff not 100% on the up and up.
3.
Well, the Seth Rich story is dead today. Barr says the material was hacked by Russians.
4.
"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
This line is going to get Mr. Barr in front of MANY committees especially when he said NO OBSTRUCTION after.
5.
From NPR
"Mueller has not been at the Justice Department this weekend and he "was not consulted on this letter."
Report head not consulted to summarize said report.... good times. So until we have the full thing (though Barr made clear he is going to hide somethings already) we only have William "Iran-contra pardons for all" Barr's word on this summary.
6.
Says absolutely nothing of spun off investigations other then not releasing info that hurts other investigations. Which means we still dont know everything even if the report is released in full.
Summary begs more questions, until we see a public release of the report but at least its something instead of the normal made up stuff that gets spread around here.
originally posted by: vor78
a reply to: UKTruth
Its never going to stick. An honest DoJ isn't going to press charges for obstruction of justice against a sitting president when there's no underlying basis of crime committed (collusion with Russia).
originally posted by: Pyle
1.
It will be damn interesting to see how all those connections to the Russian government, lies about those connections, lies about having a deal to make a tower in Moscow, lies about the Trump tower meeting, Manafort giving polling data, ect. are characterized by Mueller if he even looked into everything, considering how narrow even the summary letter is he might not have.
2.
Related to number 1 found in a footnote.
In assessing potential conspiracy charges, the Special Counsel also considered whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated with Russian election interference activities. The Special Counsel defined coordination as an "agreement" -tacit or express- between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference.
Seems like a little bit of wiggle room for people to not conspire illegally but still did stuff not 100% on the up and up.
3.
Well, the Seth Rich story is dead today. Barr says the material was hacked by Russians.
4.
"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
This line is going to get Mr. Barr in front of MANY committees especially when he said NO OBSTRUCTION after.
5.
From NPR
"Mueller has not been at the Justice Department this weekend and he "was not consulted on this letter."
Report head not consulted to summarize said report.... good times. So until we have the full thing (though Barr made clear he is going to hide somethings already) we only have William "Iran-contra pardons for all" Barr's word on this summary.
6.
Says absolutely nothing of spun off investigations other then not releasing info that hurts other investigations. Which means we still dont know everything even if the report is released in full.
Summary begs more questions, until we see a public release of the report but at least its something instead of the normal made up stuff that gets spread around here.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Confirmation also from Barr that there are no sealed indictments out there.
Another Democrat talking point smashed.
Nadler clinging on to Mueller not exonerating on obstruction... someone needs to tell him that in a free society one does not need to exonerate themselves against a charge.
They are blowing themselves up tonight worse than they did with Kavanaugh.
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
I really haven't seen or heard anyone personally believing much less pushing the Russia narrative.
I really haven't seen or heard anyone personally believing much less pushing the Russia narrative.