It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The FBI and Mueller deliberately muddled the waters between a criminal, and counter intelligence investigations. This is another reason why Mueller and his cohorts must answer for investigating non existent crimes.
and only A.G. Barr can bring charges
During the course of his investigation, the sc also referred several matters to other offices for further action.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
There is something we arn't paying attention to here as well.
The russians did in fact interfere with our elections.
And now we know. And now trump knows.
This is going to be really important going forward.
Mother Theresa look like Snidley Whiplash, or he's a genius mastermind at covering his own tracks.
The russians did in fact interfere with our elections.
And now we know. And now trump knows.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: ausername
Mullers report didn't decide anything about the obstruction of justice case.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: scraedtosleep
Forgive me.
I keep hearing all this "demand" for full release, but I have yet to hear anybody say the report won't be released.
Has anybody said the report won't be released?
You know how the government is. Redactions, blacked out pages, hiding important names.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
There is something we arn't paying attention to here as well.
The russians did in fact interfere with our elections.
And now we know. And now trump knows.
This is going to be really important going forward.
The muller report is only about two things, collusion and obstruction.
But it doesn't say anything about any other crimes being investigated by other offices.
Is there a law that would stop the sdny from pursuing the obstruction charge?
All we know right now is that trump is not a traitor.
Read the fourth paragraph of barrs summery and the 2ed paragraph under the obstruction heading and you will see what I mean.
It's always been online rumor to most though. You knew I knew but did the majority of america know and /or believe it?
Do you see the issue with starting an investigation with out hard evidence into another investigation for not having hard evidence when it started?
and only A.G. Barr can bring charges
Why do you think that?
I'd like to know what those were. And I'm sure we will find out.
Is there a law that would stop the sdny from pursuing the obstruction charge?
Read the fourth paragraph of barrs summery and the 2ed paragraph under the obstruction heading and you will see what I mean.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: xuenchen
Last half of the first paragraph under the heading obstruction of justice says the following.
The special counsel therefore DID NOT draw a conclusion -one way or the other- Whether the examined conduct constitutes obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out EVIDENCE on BOTH sides.
They then left it to the ag to decide if that evidence was enough to indict.
What that evidence was we will all find out once we read the muller report.