Twitter Bans User For Laughing At Rachel Maddow's Tears Of Despair Over Mueller Report

Appears that after Twitter banned the posters account, it has been reposted and spread by quite a few others including actor James Woods. Maddow fought back tears as she reported on the Mueller findings.

So, don't make fun of certain partisan political operatives or you may bet banned.


www.blacklistednews.com...

Maddow fought back tears as she reported on her own collapsing narrative, to which Twitter user 'Karli Bonne' (@kbq2251) posted a video of herself laughing at Maddow's despair.

As the video began to go viral, Twitter suspended her account.

Bonne then tweeted the video from another account (@kbq225) which was quickly amplified by several people, including actor James Woods, who truly gives zero f*cks now that Hollywood has blacklisted him for being openly conservative.

Conservative shadow banning? What conservative shadow banning?

a reply to: infolurker

Twitter is working for Trump and they not even know it. They made that video even more popular. These libs/far left are really stupid.

a reply to: infolurker

Meh Maddow is the poster child for Liberal derangement.
I was banned from Twitter for basically the same thing around election time in 2016.

a reply to: infolurker

wow. too funny.

we're at a new Pinnacle as a society.

a reply to: infolurker

#LearnToCode.

Oh wait, did I just get banned?

Jealous Democrats have a big bankroll at their disposal 😎

Well lets see if I can get banned too. I never use twitter anyway.

Want to know who has the power? Find out who you're not allowed to criticize.

a reply to: infolurker

Devin nunes could use this in his 250 million suut.

This doesnt happen right?

This is all a big ploy by Jack Dorsey to get a government agency to moderate his site so that he doesn't have to.
He pretty much says so in his sit down with Joe Rogan.

originally posted by: Bone75
This is all a big ploy by Jack Dorsey to get a government agency to moderate his site so that he doesn't have to.
He pretty much says so in his sit down with Joe Rogan.

You are assuming he isn't already being moderated behind the scenes.

a reply to: infolurker

Lie....
Why would she cry when nothing from the report is released.


such nonsense.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: infolurker

Lie....
Why would she cry when nothing from the report is released.


such nonsense.

Still in denial?

🤣😢😭

a reply to: Muninn

Eternally

You didnt really see what you thought you saw!

Lololololol

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: infolurker

Devin nunes could use this in his 250 million suut.

This doesnt happen right?

He could - and he has already responded on it via Twitter with one word 'Interesting'.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: infolurker

Lie....
Why would she cry when nothing from the report is released.


such nonsense.

Funniest thing I have read all day!!!

No "lie"!

So I actually went to Zerohedge to see the info this story is based on and its just a person zooming in on a face and laughing about how someone looks crying when they are not....

Does no one proof check this stuff anymore or does the outrage bully machine on the right just not give a damn?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: infolurker

Lie....
Why would she cry when nothing from the report is released.


such nonsense.

twitter.com...

www.youtube.com...


Now of course, the story is about being banned for the above.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: infolurker

Lie....
Why would she cry when nothing from the report is released.


such nonsense.

Watch the broadcast. Why would she be tearing up? Why would there be strain in her voice?