It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sooth
There are many things in this world of which I am not certain. One thing I am certain of, however, is that I will never see a talent such as Michael again in my life time. He is simply the greatest performer in the history of humankind. And I say this as someone who was not even really a big fan. Still, I can recognize something special when I see it.
In the wake of the 'Leaving Neverland' movie there is a clarion call to erase this man's art from the world. I myself am of the opinion that the accusations were likely true. But they are still merely accusations -- nothing has ever been proven and I respect the right to the opposite opinion that the allegations are completely false as a compelling argument can be made against them as well. None of us, however, have enough evidence or clarity on the matter to be in a position to determine another human being's legacy. And, absent that certainty, to deprive humanity of Michael Jackson's art would in itself be a crime.
Didn't Robson steal many of his accusation stories from a book published shortly after the 93 trial?
“His sexual needs were his sexual needs, coming from whatever childhood he has or whatever DNA he has,” she told the Times.
“You can say ‘molested,’ but those children, as you heard them say [the grown-up Robson and Safechuk], they were thrilled to be there. They both married and they both have children, so it didn’t kill them.”
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
Of Course, he was/is, the only people who believe he is guilty are people that refuse to look at actual facts, they are all out there, ignorant people need him to be guilty because he didn't fit the standard "Normal"
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
a reply to: toolgal462
Nope. Research Brooke Shields and Michael Jackson again. She admits it was fake and they never had sex. She even admits that she tried to initiate sex once and he chickened out. He then approached her again to help his image when he was being accused but she declined because she was dating Andre Agassi.
originally posted by: face23785
This revisionist history about Michael Jackson is part of the wider effort to get us to accept pedophiles as the next "orientation" that needs to be accepted in order to be "inclusive." They call them "pedosexuals." Mark my words, this will be part of the progressive platform in the next 10 years or so. People will say I'm fearmongering, but that's the same thing they said years ago when we said "next thing you'll want to let men who want to be women into the ladies' room." That's what they always say.