It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NO COLLUSION - Special Counsel Mueller has submitted report to AG Barr...it's over folks

page: 43
112
<< 40  41  42    44  45  46 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: face23785

Pretty sure that MSNBC has boasted continued viewership growth year after year. Last was Feb. They are the number two network for viewership on cable.


MSNBS is #2 because their only competition for 2nd place is CNN 😆




posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth




Judicial Watch got an admission from the DoJ yesterday that there were not even any FISA hearings before granting the FISA warrants into surveillance of Carter


Get out..... how could they get a warrant without a judge? Someone is pulling someones leg.


FISA warrants. Each application for one of these surveillance warrants (called a FISA warrant) is made before an individual judge of the court. The court may allow third parties to submit briefs as amici curiae.


You cant get a warrant woithout a hearing.

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Mach2

I don't think there will be leaks.
Only a few have access to the original material.
Its why Weissmann has been silent.
New sheriff in town leaks will be prosecuted.



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
White house says they have not been briefed on the Mueller report yet.

What are they keeping from him?


OhOh maybe the report will be canceled and new indictments announced instead !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

😱



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:49 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

More like Act 1 Scene 1


This is just the begining.

Where is big mouth shouting his victory?

White house says they have not been briefed yet. Really....

One would think they would get the scoop before anyone.
So what are they keeping from him?



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth




Judicial Watch got an admission from the DoJ yesterday that there were not even any FISA hearings before granting the FISA warrants into surveillance of Carter


Get out..... how could they get a warrant without a judge? Someone is pulling someones leg.


FISA warrants. Each application for one of these surveillance warrants (called a FISA warrant) is made before an individual judge of the court. The court may allow third parties to submit briefs as amici curiae.


You cant get a warrant woithout a hearing.

en.wikipedia.org...


(from the above "zourze") 😀


When the U.S. Attorney General determines that an emergency exists, the Attorney General may authorize the emergency employment of electronic surveillance before obtaining the necessary authorization from the FISC



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Those pesky rules.......
They just don't get it.



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth




Judicial Watch got an admission from the DoJ yesterday that there were not even any FISA hearings before granting the FISA warrants into surveillance of Carter


Get out..... how could they get a warrant without a judge? Someone is pulling someones leg.


FISA warrants. Each application for one of these surveillance warrants (called a FISA warrant) is made before an individual judge of the court. The court may allow third parties to submit briefs as amici curiae.


You cant get a warrant woithout a hearing.

en.wikipedia.org...


Anyone who believes this is naive to the real world.

I don't know if the judge was misled, or it was a rubber stamp job, but saying that it is not possible to get a warrant without the required probable cause is ridiculous.

Evidence is thown out daily over illegal warrants.

That's the problem with FISA courts. There is zero opportunity to refute the "evidence" used.

It has been established by none other the the infamous Comey, that they wouldn't have gotten the warrant without the UNSUBSTANTIATED fake dossier.



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:59 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

You all seem mighty confident.

except trump....

New York is going to get him. No escaping that.

And if this report shows nasty business but not quite illegal his standing is going to dive.



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: face23785

Pretty sure that MSNBC has boasted continued viewership growth year after year. Last was Feb. They are the number two network for viewership on cable.


MSNBS is #2 because their only competition for 2nd place is CNN 😆


Some of CNN's audience has been moving over to MSNBC because CNN isn't biased enough for them, if you can believe that.



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

You all seem mighty confident.

except trump....

New York is going to get him. No escaping that.

And if this report shows nasty business but not quite illegal his standing is going to dive.


You've just moved from believing one lie to believing another lie. How many times can you get let down before you realize the people feeding you this nonsense don't have your best interest in mind? Think.
edit on 24 3 19 by face23785 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

You all seem mighty confident.

except trump....

New York is going to get him. No escaping that.

And if this report shows nasty business but not quite illegal his standing is going to dive.


Ahahahahah
Aaaaahahahahahaha

Done with the bobby 2 sticks crap?

Ahhahahahaha

Who do the ny feds work for?

Aaahahahaahahaha

Its so ridiculous!



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

It would have been covered if it was true. Trust me.



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

More like Act 1 Scene 1


This is just the begining.

Where is big mouth shouting his victory?

White house says they have not been briefed yet. Really....

One would think they would get the scoop before anyone.
So what are they keeping from him?


This has been answered already.

Again, learn to think for yourself. Whoever told you it's a big deal the White House hasn't been briefed yet lied to you, again.



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785



The guy who has been in the White House the past 2 years is not an agent of a foreign power



Who said that?



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

You all seem mighty confident.

except trump....

New York is going to get him. No escaping that.

And if this report shows nasty business but not quite illegal his standing is going to dive.


What happened to the reasonable silly i was conversing with yesterday?



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

You dont want the details?

You want them to tell you what to think?

This is not ATS.... I must be in some alternate universe.



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

You all seem mighty confident.

except trump....

New York is going to get him. No escaping that.

And if this report shows nasty business but not quite illegal his standing is going to dive.


It's not about confidence. It's about facts.

The conclusion of the 2yr long Mueller investigation is that he couldn't find a crime to indict Trump or anyone on his campaign with relating to colluding / conspiracy with Russia to influence the election AND he couldn't bring charges for obstruction.

If you want to pin your hopes on SDNY and Inaguaration contributions / hotel guests and emoluments clause, that is up to you. You are going to be sadly disappointed.

The only thing we are waiting for now is the report conclusions to see whether there is anything politically damaging to Trump. The criminal element is over. Done.

You already have egg all over your face - it just remains to be seen whether you've been provided with a cloth to wipe it off or whether you'll have to walk around with it.
edit on 24/3/2019 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:07 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

Its not true he said that?

Its on tape.



posted on Mar, 24 2019 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Just to be fair, a sitting president cant be indicted, but you are correct, if anyone close to him hasn't been, likely they never will.




top topics



 
112
<< 40  41  42    44  45  46 >>

log in

join