It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NO COLLUSION - Special Counsel Mueller has submitted report to AG Barr...it's over folks

page: 17
112
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 10:24 PM
link   
a reply to: libertytoall

Keep it classy




posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 10:27 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

Can't wait to read this. Our money paid for it, I think we should get to see what we paid for.

Enough guesswork and threads like these where crossing fingers and saying 'hope, hope' is presented as conclusive evidence. Let us read it and stop all the opinions and guessing.

We deserve to know what our leaders do and what conduct they engage in. If they want power, they owe us transparency in return. There should not even be a dissenting opinion on this.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 10:31 PM
link   
A lot of moving the goal posts going on here really would like to see congress and Trump work together for the country like we elected them to do.


edit on 22-3-2019 by putnam6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 10:34 PM
link   
Big celebration in Moscow !!

Live from Trump Towers !!

LET'S TWIST AGAIN - Adriana Vlad Band


+5 more 
posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 10:38 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut


The connection to the Trump campaign was in the indictment document.

Guccifer was alias used representative of the hackers and Guccifer contacted a senior official in the Trump campaign to report on progress.


Contact isn't a crime. Knowing about a crime does not conspiracy make, or have you failed to also read Federal jury instructions on "Conspiracy" charges?

For a conspiracy to exist, the participants must knowingly and overtly hatch a plan to break Federal law and then take some overt action in furtherance of that conspiracy. Attempting to get emails or other dirt on a political opponent isn't a crime - otherwise the Clinton's would've been marched off in 2016.

Communicating with/cooperating with WL isn't a crime either. Unless Trump was directly involved in the theft (ie: funded it, ordered it, etc) it is wholly irrelevant that he (along with the rest of us) got ahold of leaked/stolen information. Totally and absolutely irrelevant.

Furthermore.... whether "Guccifer" is a foreign agent is a hotly debated topic. The original one was merely a single person taking advantage of some leftist tech company brain trust (not so smart after all, huh)

Mueller may not have been able to indict Trump if he had reason, but Trump Jr. and others were not off limits at all. Explain them "walking" despite Avenatti, Dworkin and all the far-left "heroes" proclaiming otherwise? Why wasn't "Junior" (as many here called him) even so much as interviewed by Mueller? He wasn't even interviewed, you know.

Shame on you all for dividing the country like this and tarnishing the reputation of agencies our people have fought and died to uphold. And even more shame for trying to drag this totally debunked nonsense out a minute longer than it had to be. You all should be on your hands and knees begging for your nation's forgiveness for what you all did to it. Instead, what do we see? More smugness, more self-deluded 4D chess Tom Clancy spy novel bull #.
edit on 3/22/2019 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 10:46 PM
link   
a reply to: ausername




posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 10:47 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Because it had nothing to do with his campaign which is what the Investigation was about. Can't engage can you?



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 10:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut

Ahahahaha
Is that the one that came with the Rosenstein disclaimer?
No Americans associated?

Lololololol


Paragraph 44.


I read [paragraph 44.

Nowhere does it say anyone connected to trump was indicted for conspiring with russians.

Can you show me where that paragraph says any American even was indicted?

Is your dislike of trump so string that you are literally reading words that dont exist to confirm your narrative?


The hackers, who used the alias Guccifer 2.0, were the ones indicted, the e-mails, to a senior Trump campaign staffer is the connection.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Ok and so?

As I and other have showed, no one connected to trumps team was a ducted for conspiring with Russians



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: chr0naut

You're embarrassing yourself, Chro. Heck, I feel embarrassed for you. No kidding. No collusion. Okay?


That is because collusion isn't even a federal offense.

Mueller was not investigating 'collusion'.

Trump's Tweet that there was "no collusion" is true and also entirely beside the point. He was being investigated for 'collusion'.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mach2

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: chr0naut

Then he should be charged and prosecuted. In America we investigate crimes, not people in the hopes of finding a crime.


What is the point of investigation if we already know a crime has been committed and who the guilty party is?

The rule is 'innocent until proven guilty', and that determination of guilt happens in a court of law, and well after the investigation.

An investigation does not equal guilt, just like an allegation does not equal guilt.


The point of investigation is to make a provable court case.

You investigate the crime. That is not what happened here. Here they found dog crap on the sidewalk, then attributed to Trump, even though he had never been in that part of town.


If the sidewalk was in California, that’s not dog crap.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Save your breath friend. It feels like talking to a wall when debating some people, because they can't stop spinning the narrative in their heads, even if that narrative has been proven false.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:04 PM
link   
Oh no! Mueller is Russian! He is part of the collusion!

We have to start the whole thing all over again with a different investigator!!!



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: chr0naut

You're embarrassing yourself, Chro. Heck, I feel embarrassed for you. No kidding. No collusion. Okay?


That is because collusion isn't even a federal offense.

Mueller was not investigating 'collusion'.

Trump's Tweet that there was "no collusion" is true and also entirely beside the point. He was being investigated for 'collusion'.


You can play semantics if you want

Him and his team were being investigated for allegedly conspiring with Russians to get illegal help to win the election

No one in trumps team was indicted for that after almost three years of investigation



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: chr0naut

Ok and so?

As I and other have showed, no one connected to trumps team was a ducted for conspiring with Russians


Is this like an alternative script for Idiocracy?

The hackers had links to a senior Trump campaign staffer (the link). The hackers were indicted (the indictment).

People linked to the Trump campaign were indicted.

Sheesh!




posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: shawmanfromny
a reply to: Grambler

Save your breath friend. It feels like talking to a wall when debating some people, because they can't stop spinning the narrative in their heads, even if that narrative has been proven false.



I don’t mind

I know others are reading and can see how some people are so invested in the narrative they will deny reality



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:06 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Did...you actually read your response.....lol



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:06 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Trump is going to be President for six more years.
No indictment. No impeachment. And definitely no competition from democrat failures posing as presidential candidates.

You’re gutted.



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:07 PM
link   
Hows that big fat juicy beefless nothing burger taste?

---->*LONGEST AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! inserted here*



posted on Mar, 22 2019 @ 11:08 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Along with hundreds, thousands and millions of other folks. What is your point?

That asking for and receiving leaked/stolen material is now a crime? This flies in the face of decades of US policy, starting with the Pentagon papers.

Admit it, John Podesta and Robby Mook started this nonsensical narrative the minute Clinton failed to explain her loss. Meanwhile, those of us paying attention knew she was in trouble when she went on TV - exasperated - complaining about not having a "50 point lead"


I am done arguing this with you, if you want to believe this nonsense go right ahead. Most people do not. Including the Special Counsel - hence why "Junior" wasn't even interviewed and why your oft-touted Mueller-savior ended with a whimper not a bang. This is also why nobody "flipped" despite assertions from some here - there was nothing to "flip" on!

Fact is this: if you want to beat Trump, you will just have to do so within Constitutionally established framework of show up to the darn election and vote for you candidate of choice!
edit on 3/22/2019 by JBurns because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
112
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join