It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mach2
a reply to: chr0naut
Who made the allegations, and on the basis of what proof, or credible information?
Anyone can alledge anything they want. You don't normally take them seriously without credible evidence to back it up. The entire basis of the charade was based on a fake dossier, leading to an illegal (IMO) FISA warrant, requested by conspirators in the FBI, abetted by an opposition "justice" department, that produced nothing.
You don't see a problem with any of this? At all?
originally posted by: UKTruth
If the report has nothing to indict Trump or recommend impeachment after 3 years of investigation, 2 of which were a Special Counsel, then we'll have to conclude that President Trump is the least corrupt world leader in history.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Mach2
a reply to: chr0naut
Who made the allegations, and on the basis of what proof, or credible information?
Anyone can alledge anything they want. You don't normally take them seriously without credible evidence to back it up. The entire basis of the charade was based on a fake dossier, leading to an illegal (IMO) FISA warrant, requested by conspirators in the FBI, abetted by an opposition "justice" department, that produced nothing.
You don't see a problem with any of this? At all?
There have been about 30 indictments due to the investigation. It hasn't produced nothing.
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
.......perhaps you should just man up and post an answer to the question the poster asked you two times?
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: chr0naut
Who has been convicted in connection with Russian interference?
Google it, but don't look at the ones from earlier than this year.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: chr0naut
Then he should be charged and prosecuted. In America we investigate crimes, not people in the hopes of finding a crime.
What is the point of investigation if we already know a crime has been committed and who the guilty party is?
The rule is 'innocent until proven guilty', and that determination of guilt happens in a court of law, and well after the investigation.
An investigation does not equal guilt, just like an allegation does not equal guilt.
To investigate there must be a crime.
Otherwise what is being investigated?
An investigation uncovers who committed the crime.
The crime was Russian interference in the 2016 US Presidential elections. There was no doubt that it occurred. It was alleged that individuals from the Trump campaign had conspired with the Russians. There were many indictments and convictions to that effect as a result of the investigation.
Show me one indictment that shows anyone connected to trump conspiring with russians in the 2016 election.
OK
originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: chr0naut
I thought 24 Russians were indicted earlier this year. But we aren't ever going to see those people in our courts.
originally posted by: matafuchs
Investigating the campaign
investigating the foundation
investigating the business
investigating the transition
investigating the white house...2 years and millions of dollars
finding nothing.....priceless....
Voters will NOT forget this. They did not in 2016. Midterms swayed the centrist voter but we lost nothing and gained in the Senate. 2020, if Trump can take back the house and flush some more RINO's, will be a dream scenario for true Americans.
Impeach this....
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: chr0naut
Then he should be charged and prosecuted. In America we investigate crimes, not people in the hopes of finding a crime.
What is the point of investigation if we already know a crime has been committed and who the guilty party is?
The rule is 'innocent until proven guilty', and that determination of guilt happens in a court of law, and well after the investigation.
An investigation does not equal guilt, just like an allegation does not equal guilt.
To investigate there must be a crime.
Otherwise what is being investigated?
An investigation uncovers who committed the crime.
The crime was Russian interference in the 2016 US Presidential elections. There was no doubt that it occurred. It was alleged that individuals from the Trump campaign had conspired with the Russians. There were many indictments and convictions to that effect as a result of the investigation.
Show me one indictment that shows anyone connected to trump conspiring with russians in the 2016 election.
OK
Read the article with an open mind that you linked as proof of Russian collusion. The information released from the Meuller/Comey team quite a while back already stated there was no party that knew the Russians were behind the information, that also goes for information provided for the dossier that started all of this. Some people who got the info for the dossier did know some was coming from the Russians, but no politician can be shown to have known about that.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: matafuchs
Investigating the campaign
investigating the foundation
investigating the business
investigating the transition
investigating the white house...2 years and millions of dollars
finding nothing.....priceless....
Voters will NOT forget this. They did not in 2016. Midterms swayed the centrist voter but we lost nothing and gained in the Senate. 2020, if Trump can take back the house and flush some more RINO's, will be a dream scenario for true Americans.
Impeach this....
Based upon?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
El oh el
WTF is a FISA raid ?
Do they have those in hobbiton?
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: chr0naut
Then he should be charged and prosecuted. In America we investigate crimes, not people in the hopes of finding a crime.
What is the point of investigation if we already know a crime has been committed and who the guilty party is?
The rule is 'innocent until proven guilty', and that determination of guilt happens in a court of law, and well after the investigation.
An investigation does not equal guilt, just like an allegation does not equal guilt.
To investigate there must be a crime.
Otherwise what is being investigated?
An investigation uncovers who committed the crime.
The crime was Russian interference in the 2016 US Presidential elections. There was no doubt that it occurred. It was alleged that individuals from the Trump campaign had conspired with the Russians. There were many indictments and convictions to that effect as a result of the investigation.
Show me one indictment that shows anyone connected to trump conspiring with russians in the 2016 election.
OK
Read the article with an open mind that you linked as proof of Russian collusion. The information released from the Meuller/Comey team quite a while back already stated there was no party that knew the Russians were behind the information, that also goes for information provided for the dossier that started all of this. Some people who got the info for the dossier did know some was coming from the Russians, but no politician can be shown to have known about that.
This is the crux of it. The left got played by the Russians to cause this chaos for the past 2 years.