It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Clinton, in newly revealed emails, discussed classified foreign policy matters, secretive 'private' comms channel with Israel
A newly unearthed batch of heavily redacted, classified emails from Hillary Clinton's personal email server revealed that the former secretary of state discussed establishing a "private, 100% off-the-record" back channel to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and that one of her top aides warned her that she was in "danger" of being "savaged by Jewish organizations, in the Jewish press and among the phalanx of neoconservative media" as a result of political machinations by "Bibi and the Jewish leadership."
The 756-page group of new documents, revealed Thursday as part of a transparency lawsuit by Judicial Watch, seemingly contradicted Clinton's insistence under oath in 2015 that she had turned over all of her sensitive work-related emails to the State Department, and included a slew of classified communications on everything from foreign policy to State Department personnel matters.
The files came from a trove of 72,000 documents the FBI recovered and turned over to the State Department in 2017.
originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: xuenchen
i looked at the link.
it did not say a law had been broken.
it did not say a crime had been committed.
so what is it that we are suppose to get from this article?
In September 2, 2010, email exchange marked classified, longtime Clinton confidante Lanny Davis tells Secretary Clinton that he could serve as a private channel for her to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying he had a βprivate and highly trusted communication line, unofficial and personal, to PM N[etanyahu].β Davis goes on to say β[N]o one on the planet (other than your wonderful husband) can get this done as well as you.β¦β Secretary Clinton responds with classified information, saying βI will reach out to you directly and hope you will continue to do the same w me. The most important issue now is [Redacted B1].β
originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: xuenchen
i looked at the link.
it did not say a law had been broken.
it did not say a crime had been committed.
so what is it that we are suppose to get from this article?
originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: Lumenari
my point is that if she broke a law, then both links in the opening post would have stated it to be so.
if she broke a law then she should be held accountable for it.
but after a senate committee hearing and hours of testimony, she was found not guilty of wrong doing.
did i miss something here?
a link to where she was found guilty of a crime would be nice.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: subfab
Yet apparently you will not get that educated answer from our OP.
originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: subfab
She wasn't found guilty of a crime because she was never put on trial. Obama, the DOJ and FBI protected her by refusing to indite and prosecute her sorry ass. The fact she hasn't been found guilty, in her case, is irrelevant.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: subfab
Recent sworn testimonies from former and fired FBI/DOJ people say she violated the "Gross Negligence" statutes but others in the Obama Administration ordered the "Gross Negligence" thing changed to something not illegal.
The FBI investigations actually show Hillary did in fact break laws that are felonies.
An Inspector General report also confirms.
Look it up.
The educated answers are all over the place π