It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1.– GLOBAL WARMING TO WIPE NATIONS "OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH" IF CLIMATE CHANGE NOT ADDRESSED BY YEAR 2000
In 1989, the Associated Press relayed a warning from a U.N. official:
"A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000."
2.– MASS STARVATION BY 1975
In 1967, a best-selling book came out called “Famine 1975! America’s Decision: Who Will Survive?”
It predicted mass starvation around the developing world due to increasing population. “Today’s crisis can move in only one direction – toward catastrophe,” it warned.
GLOBAL FREEZING AS DANGEROUS AS NUCLEAR WAR
Global cooling was once a worry to many, such as University of California at Davis professor Kenneth Watt, who warned that present trends would make the world “eleven degrees colder in the year 2000 ... about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”
MASSIVE WARMING BY THE YEAR 2000
The same U.N. official who predicted the loss of entire nations by the year 2000 also claimed: "the most conservative scientific estimate [is] that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years.”
But looking back from 2019, the temperature rose about half of a degree Celsius since 1989, according to NASA.
ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHE WILL CAUSE “NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST” BY THE YEAR 2000
In 1982, U.N. official Mostafa Tolba, executive director of the UN Environment Program, warned:
“By the turn of the century, an environmental catastrophe will witness devastation as complete, as irreversible, as any nuclear holocaust.”
Williams also cites Sen. Timothy Wirth, a Democrat from Colorado, who said in 1988: "We've got to ... try to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong ... we will be doing the right thing anyway in terms of economic policy and environmental policy
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: 727Sky
For those of us old enough, who had that idea of global cooling pushed and pushed on us in college classes, it's why we simply no longer believe them.
All the trees north of the Canadian border were supposed to be gone long before now. We were supposed to run out of arable land and people were supposed to have starved worldwide before now. We were supposed to run out of oil before now. All of that taught as fact.
There comes a point when you realize a lot of it is tied to money. That scientists are as greedy and dishonest when looking for funding as any other profession.
originally posted by: 727Sky
Some of this stuff is pure NWO/agenda 2030/ couple with eugenics crowd who wants to kill everyone else or stop them from breeding so they the elite can have a bigger slice of the pie of life.
I imagine the wealthy elite would want there to be as many people as possible on the planet because people / markets are how they make their money. Who pays taxes? Who pays for junk from Amazon? Who eats all the food and needs houses and computers so we have to cut down the forests and suck all the oil out of the ground?
originally posted by: 727Sky
All good points if you are thinking in today's terms.....but.... think about yesteryear where everyone was a surf and worked the land the masters owned .. They were slaves in every way but by name.