It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

When a terrorist attacks

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2019 @ 01:33 PM
link   
Happy days and an early Spring to you ATS! I want to posit a question to you today, and it's goal is to confront the glaring hypocrisy from the Left as it pertains to how they treat a terrorist attack differently between a Muslim attack and 1st-world citizen. With the recent massacre to the Christchurch Muslims (ironic group name), I believe this as as good a time as any to confront the moral inconsistencies of the progressive doctrine.

The question can best be described as an example, and I give this to you, the two ways a Liberal will address the topic:

1st-world Terrorist Attacks - "How horrible!" or "White conservative Christians are what's wrong with the world." or "Why can't they let the Muslims live peacefully?"

Muslim Terrorist Attacks - "We have to look at what we're doing to their countries." or "We're causing terrorists by our actions." or "They're attacking their own people mostly (this one always gets me, as if that's a better situation).

I think the hypocrisy is obvious. If you are a Muslim attacker, then it is OUR fault because of the what is happening in their countries of origin, or it's because of something OUR military has done. Yet, when a 1st-world terrorist commits a slaughter of innocents like at Christchurch, why doesn't the Left ask those same questions about this type of terrorist?

1) What have the Muslims done to make the Christchurch murderer angry?

2) Is how we are dealing with it creating more Christchurch-like tragedies?

3) Why aren't the 1st-world terrorists mainly attacking their own people of origin?

Beyond this hypocrisy, it seems in this political climate that those types of questions are not being asked, let alone significant amounts of MSM airtime devoted to them.

WHY ATS?

Why aren't those questions being asked by the Left about the Christchurch murderer? Are those really your concerns or are they only brought out when a Muslim needs defending? Why are those values so inconsistent?




posted on Mar, 16 2019 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Tempter

...Entering conspiracy mode...

1st world nations are too strong with a homogeneous population, that will ultimately resist a one world government and being ruled over like slaves. The powers that be are too impatient to allow enough time for our horrible educational system to destroy the minds of the youth, which will be necessary to create a one world government.

They then speed up this process by bringing in a massive amount of people that don't share benevolent ideologies of the indigent population and never assimilate after their invasion. Presto, the people are too busy fighting each other to do anything about the true underlying cause of their newfound misery. They are too indoctrinated and poorly educated to see the real causes of their misery and loss of freedoms. They then latch onto the feelz good messages sent out by our fully bought and paid for mainstream media mouthpieces. These PC/SJW feelz good messages further enslave the dumbed down population who are no so hopelessly lost, they will welcome our masters ideals of one world rule with open arms.

I would say we are about 1/2 way there already. Right at the peak of where we can still reverse course.


But who knows, I am a racist by stating such things and thus should be considered compromised.



posted on Mar, 16 2019 @ 02:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Tempter

We had a somewhat similar problem in south africa in the 80's.the liberal/progressive apologists made excuses for the anc (Mandela et al) killing their own people in soweto and other townships. The anc used bombs, necklacing, general torture, etc to achieve their goals, it was all terrorism. There was no condemnation by these agenda driven liberals that whipped the media frenzy up. When the anc blew up other non-blacks, it became everyone else's fault. I've seen necklacings in real time in soweto, it takes a monstrous evil like Nelson and Winnie to dream up this stuff and then use it as a tool of terror and extortion.

When we went to the borders to put in place systems to kill incoming terrorists or up close and personal, we were again condemned as being racist and part of the problem, even though we were preventing incoming terrorists from killing anyone, no matter their colour. You know, killing one terrorist can save one person or it can save ten thousand, some of those we ended could have killed thousands of innocent soft targets. We didn't have a political agenda, we just didn't want to see innocent people die, horribly.

So the hypocrisy of the liberals and progressives is necessary to drive their agenda. That's all it is and they don't care how many innocent people they kill or how many terrorists they create as long as they maintain their control and their power. Soros, the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, etc, any of the bankster cartel have chosen liberalism and socialism to eventually achieve a dictatorship of sorts. They could have used Conservatives for the same agenda, but it would have been harder as socialist type people want other other people to blame and do their thinking for them.

It takes at least two sides to argue, make war, drive an agenda.....

Cheers - Dave
edit on 3/16.2019 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)



 
3

log in

join