|
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 06:45 PM by RobertBurns
|
Colonel, you think of Clinton as some "savior".
You won't be thinking that when Chinese troops pour out of Containers from the ports they aquired from Clinton.
You won't be thinking that when you're crawling through some chinese muck to bejing, under artillery fire.
The difference between us Conservatives, is we curse Clinton now for his crimes against the USA.
While you'll be cursing him in your grave in Chinese soil.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 06:48 PM by Colonel
|
Thank you ,seekerof, I appreciate the good words.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 06:52 PM by Seekerof
|
Originally posted by Colonel
Thank you ,seekerof, I appreciate the good words.
Anytime....I think if you had made some 'enemies', you would have no problem discerning them eh?
Your topics are obviously well looked at, hence the 'viewed' and are quite obviously remarked upon, hence the post count. Whats the old
proverb....."fight the good fight?"
regards
seekerof
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 06:54 PM by Thomas Crowne
|
I'm not on crack, but I do recognize an arse when I see it!
Seriously, you have acrued no enemies because of your thoughts (no matter how lacking in reality they are based) but because of your lack of civility
and etiquette.
As far as your assertion that Clinton brought prosperity, I'll not buy into that nonsense. Reagan built the base for prosperity, and what Bush
didn't screw up Clinton destroyed. It is now common knolwedge for all to see (if one wants to see it) that the economy was tanking before Clinton
left. That was hidden by all involved to give Gore a better chance at the White House. Were it not for the terrorist attacks, we might have pulled
out of it thanks to economic stimulation through tax cuts, etc. had it not been for that. The jobless rate can also be a bit misleading, but I'm not
getting into that right now.
As far as laying off of Clinton, why? You mean to tell me only loud-mouth liberals are allowed to attack at will? I can imagine one not wanting
Clinton brought up, he is quite the embarrassment. He served himself and the rest of the world better than he did this country. Not to worry, water
under the bridge. I just hope the rest of the country learned the lesson and will be more careful next time.
Glad to see you're still here, by the way.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 06:54 PM by Colonel
|
Exactly, got to get the message out of the evil on this land in order to save the republic.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 06:58 PM by Colonel
|
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
I'm not on crack, but I do recognize an arse when I see it!
Seriously, you have acrued no enemies because of your thoughts (no matter how lacking in reality they are based) but because of your lack of civility
and etiquette.
As far as your assertion that Clinton brought prosperity, I'll not buy into that nonsense. Reagan built the base for prosperity, and what Bush
didn't screw up Clinton destroyed. It is now common knolwedge for all to see (if one wants to see it) that the economy was tanking before Clinton
left. That was hidden by all involved to give Gore a better chance at the White House. Were it not for the terrorist attacks, we might have pulled
out of it thanks to economic stimulation through tax cuts, etc. had it not been for that. The jobless rate can also be a bit misleading, but I'm not
getting into that right now.
As far as laying off of Clinton, why? You mean to tell me only loud-mouth liberals are allowed to attack at will? I can imagine one not wanting
Clinton brought up, he is quite the embarrassment. He served himself and the rest of the world better than he did this country. Not to worry, water
under the bridge. I just hope the rest of the country learned the lesson and will be more careful next time.
Glad to see you're still here, by the way.
On the ememy issue, I don't mind. I'm accustomed to it (it makes for good battles).
On the Clinton thing, how can you spout those lies? 'It was Reagan, then it was Bush. So, it took 12 yrs for us to see prosperity, I think not. It
just ook sound economics---not VOODOO economics to turn this country around and Clinton was at the forefront of that.
As forlaying off clinton, the reason is simple. He's no longer president.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 06:59 PM by Tyriffic
|
Since DarkH is away I will respond to your response to my question to HIM.
There was no question overall morale in the military was dropped undr clinton. He drastically accelerated the downsizing Bush1 was running.
His first break with the military was his social experiment-Don't ask, don't tell. A ludicrous promise he kept to the Gay lobby who gave his
campaign coffers over 7million$$. What a cluster this caused.
Everyone knew he was a poser, he could not even (had to be taught) render a proper salute-he has no respect for our military men and women.
Thank God a patriot and not a dodger is in office after 9/11
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 07:04 PM by Colonel
|
Originally posted by Tyriffic
Since DarkH is away I will respond to your response to my question to HIM.
There was no question overall morale in the military was dropped undr clinton. He drastically accelerated the downsizing Bush1 was running.
His first break with the military was his social experiment-Don't ask, don't tell. A ludicrous promise he kept to the Gay lobby who gave his
campaign coffers over 7million$$. What a cluster this caused.
Everyone knew he was a poser, he could not even (had to be taught) render a proper salute-he has no respect for our military men and women.
Thank God a patriot and not a dodger is in office after 9/11
You checked the morale now? It is at the LOWEST levels. Everyone hates Rumsfeld. He's firing career officers. Our servicemen want to come home from
Iraq. There is no exit strategy in Iraq but for "Just bring it." (What the hell is that?)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 07:13 PM by Tyriffic
|
Man, you and the CBS news....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 07:14 PM by Colonel
|
Actually, it was an editorial I read in the Washington Post today from a serviceman.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 07:19 PM by Tyriffic
|
I think when you say morale, you have to ask all of the military. Not those on station in a conflict soley.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 07:21 PM by Colonel
|
Well, don't you think they shold come home after serving in a conflict and not stay there to do policing/ On average, there is one serviceman killed
A DAY since Bush said "Mission Accomplished."
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 07:44 PM by darkhowling
|
Sorry about the temporary absence, had a little problem to sort out here....
Want a blunt answer? Yes, I do.
I know that for the most part, the majority of my branch is glad for a good chance to stretch our legs(of course, we're a bunch of bloodthirsty
Marines  ) Seriously though, I would chop dead wood away if it was needed. I am not sure who you speak of specifically when you mention the career
officers, but then again, I have been out of the news loop for almost a month now.
Perhaps with all the turnover in the JCOS seats, there have been some rapid policy changes. I know that's the case for our branch. With changes in
policy, people get fired, from top to bottom. Either they adapt and overcome, or they get replaced.
As in all wars, the servicemen/women want to come home. I'm waiting as eagerly as anyone to see us pull out. But it would be foolhardy to just
leave without a proper mop-up. I don't agree with us playing God over there, but we need to cover our 6, ya know? How do you know there isn't an
exit strategy? What did we expect when we saw our men and women going overseas? I certainly didn't expect a quick, painless ass-kicking followed by
a glorious return home. War is ugly from start to finish, and its never over until a couple of years after the loser gets beat. They just don't
realize it yet. I was yelling at reporters on TV (from my room) during the war because they were complaining that it wasn't resolved within a week.
PLEASE! What a ridiculous assumption. When Bush, Jr. commited us to this war,he commited us for the long haul. I would think that everyone had
come to understand and accept this. Oh, well.
I think that if it had been someone else in office(a Democrat) we probably wouldn't have been in iraq, at least not this soon. however, our
military would continue to shrink until we were merely a few underpaid, undertrained bitter citizens with really expensive weapons. As a fighting
force, we would no longer be feared by our enemies, who have little enough respect for us as it is. At least this way, we have sent a clear message
to our enemies that we will not hesitate to defend ourselves or our interests.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 08:13 PM by Bob88
|
Originally posted by Colonel
Actually, it was an editorial I read in the Washington Post today from a serviceman.
did you have time, this time, to check it? Unlike the link which started this thread, which I oWnD you on?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 09:23 PM by Colonel
|
Very funny--ha-ha. Its intodays editorial page which I am trying to bring up but having a difficult time.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 09:35 PM by Seekerof
|
Originally posted by Colonel
Very funny--ha-ha. Its intodays editorial page which I am trying to bring up but having a difficult time.
You owe me one Colonel.
"Troop morale in Iraq hits 'rock bottom'.
www.csmonitor.com...
regards
seekerof
[Edited on 8-7-2003 by Seekerof]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 09:35 PM by darkhowling
|
Don't worry, we're patient.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 09:58 PM by Starwalker
|
Colonel
It looked to me like he was wearing standard flight gear for the type of aircraft that he arrived in.
In any case, it's understandable that you are upset, seeing as you made a statement and then were proven wrong. I've noticed that you don't take
that very well.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 10:04 PM by darkhowling
|
OWW! Now, now. If you can't sayanything nice, make stuff up.  nah, let him keep going. Its fun to share my opinions on the side topics that come
up.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-7-2003 @ 10:29 PM by maynardsthirdeye
|
Originally posted by nyeff
If you want to call Bush a jerk,that is fine,its your choice and you are free to do so.(your wrong  )
Now I wonder would you have posted this if it was Clinton or a future dem President? Or would you have responded the same we have and say its no big
deal.
Why even bother saying he's wrong if you say he has a right to his opinion. I hate it when people do that.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |