It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: chr0naut
He railed against diversity, praising “non diverse nations” like China, which he said most closely shared his political and social values.
Those political and social values are not right wing, thats super far left..........
I dunno why we even bother posting facts to you, you ignore them like youre going to catch actual knowledge from them..........ew icky
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: xuenchen
I mean Trump DIDNT denounce the Nazis and racists at that event last year.
That's the point, as the leader of this country
Trump needs to vociferously condemn racist haters
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: chr0naut
He railed against diversity, praising “non diverse nations” like China, which he said most closely shared his political and social values.
Those political and social values are not right wing, thats super far left..........
I dunno why we even bother posting facts to you, you ignore them like youre going to catch actual knowledge from them..........ew icky
Sarcasm right? Because I can’t count the number of times right leaning posters have cried about the left wanting diversity and forcing it on them.
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: chr0naut
He railed against diversity, praising “non diverse nations” like China, which he said most closely shared his political and social values.
Those political and social values are not right wing, thats super far left..........
I dunno why we even bother posting facts to you, you ignore them like youre going to catch actual knowledge from them..........ew icky
Sarcasm right? Because I can’t count the number of times right leaning posters have cried about the left wanting diversity and forcing it on them.
Can you link to and quote an example of what diversity is being opposed, and how the person being quoted is opposing diversity?
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Pyle
And there is a big difference being civil under current law, and being programmed to accept something. Or as you stated, “forcing it on them”. Where is that provision in the constitution?
Example.
I acknowledge the right for people to be bar flys, living off drama, and drinking themselves silly. Doesn’t mean I would live such a life style, or except it as being healthy.
Equal protection under the law, the 14th amendment, and others can force diversity onto others legally.....
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: chr0naut
If you are going to have conversations about American politics, perhaps you should at least understand what you are talking about. Or at least talk about this century. Nazi Germany isn't around any more and things have changed politically.
I saw what you did there as well...
His manifesto says: “were/are you a supporter of Donald Trump?” and gives the answer: “As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure".
I guess it was just coincidence you left out the next sentence...
As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.
The right and left as defined in America has nothing to do with the rest of the world.
Perhaps that is why you come across so clueless sometimes when speaking about the topic.
We don't really care about how you define left and right.
We are having a conversation about our own politics.
If we were having a conversation about your politics, for instance, I would point out that I'm sorry that your government has so emasculated its own population with your gun control laws.
If your citizens were armed he probably would have chosen France.
We have public gun ownership and all our police are armed.
Our gun laws are stricter than yours, though, because your gun laws basically say anyone can have them, and carry them in public. You barely have any legal control.
Your 'laws' assures that every criminal would be armed as they have the most use for, and motivation for, a gun in society.
Don't try and use the gun situation in your country as an argument here because it makes American legislators and public look very stupid.
Also, our gun laws are very similar and about as restrictive as France's gun laws. I doubt that there is the slightest suggestion that gun laws would have changed this deranged individual's actions.
How the hell do you think the Christchurch gunman got his weapons?
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: HarbingerOfShadows
a reply to: chr0naut
In order.
He would say he was. Considering his plan. The plan you ignore to do what you want to anyway. You're being played by a madman in exactly the way he said you would. Read the damn manifesto. You're refusing to look beyond your comfortable little boxes and thusly making the insane dreams of a madman reality.
LoL! Can you really be this myopic? You do not know me, kindly stop pretending you do. I'm facing a very uncomfortable truth. One you avoid in order to feel righteous. That truth is people are allowing a madman to drive us into a insane future.
And the guy on the live stream is conveniently the most publicized. What exactly is your point?
I have read his manifesto.
He is a right-wing lunatic.
I'm with our Prime Minister that we shouldn't let this change us or our core beliefs and actions.
We should simply amputate his hands, so he could never perpetrate such atrocities again, and then compassionately and anonymously release him back out into society, in Australia. It saves us money that we'd have to spend housing and feeding him, if he went to prison.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ketsuko
In 2016, a Muslim went into a gay bar and killed 49 people.
It was a terrible, nightmarish tragedy then.
As this shooting is now.
Sometimes the bad guys do bad things. But we all survive.