It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Anyone running against Trump in 2020 is just trying to line their pockets..who should challenge?

page: 1
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 01:22 AM
link   
2020 is a given for Donald Trump. Fact. He will pull the same people he did in 2016 despite reports. In fact, based on people I know, he is going to pick up some demographic numbers and could even take a normally blue state in 2020.

Why?

Because no one running right now has a chance in hell at winning. Please, tell me, who you would want to be on stage from the DNC pool to debate the sitting president. Who would it be? It is all about the Benjamin's as AOC states but for the current election cycle not to make a difference like they should after being elected.

The DNC is looking at over 20 people already who think they will challenge Trump. Well, at least when they are on CNBC or a local news channel. One that makes their view look good. Because they sure could use it. This is all about money and a last shot before it is all over.

No one in the GOP field is crazy enough to challenge him and if they are then we know they are certifiable right? Name a GOP member who will step up to challenge Trump. This will be fun.

So, please tell me....is 2020 set in stone or is something else in play.

DNC Choice and RNC Choice....and......GO!!!!!!




posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 01:43 AM
link   
The only person the Dems have to energize their base is probably Bernie, but the guy is old as dirt and I don’t think communism will play well in a general election.

On the Republican side no one is going to challenge Trump. Frankly, even Republican voters don’t like the BS the Republicans have been laying down lately.

I don’t have love for either party...I just dislike Democrats more.
edit on 2019/3/13 by Metallicus because: Sp



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 01:45 AM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs
Furthermore there is a very specific social difference between Republicans and Democrats in general that is not being taken into account. The large field of candidates for the Republican nomination increased the viability of the winner. The Democrats saw this and are banking on having a large field of candidates also resulting in a more highly viable candidate. However using this parallel, and trying to apply it to the Democrat's voting base will do the opposite.

I can back this claim up with data from 2010, from a source that may seem odd to people who like an analysis data.
source: theblog.okcupid.com...

The most important part for my claim is the following at the very end of that article.



Finally, let’s take a look at OkCupid’s specialty: matching people up. Our final analysis will be to exclude explicitly political questions and see how groups of different ideologies match with themselves; i.e. how compatible they find each other. Below is a matrix showing person-to-person match percentages for the various points in the political plane: How Points In The Political Plane Match With Themselves As you can see, Republicans get along with each other quite a bit better than Democrats do, even on non-political issues. We’ve used match percentages like these to facilitate over 100,000 marriages in the last few years; their accuracy is pretty well-tested. If you’re wondering, the site-wide average is 60. We calculate these numbers by posing a series of questions to our users.

Just to give you a sense of what these questions are like, here are the top three most important (by user vote):
1. If you had to name your greatest motivation in life so far, what would it be? • Love • Wealth • Expression • Knowledge
2. Which makes for a better relationship? Passion Dedication
3. Are you happy with your life? Yes No

The fact that Democrats can’t reach a common consensus on some multiple-choice Q&As may speak volumes about why they struggle to reach a common consensus when it comes to government.




From this and the chart contained within that section, we can see that having a large number of candidates will only divide their party further. This is unlike that which occurred for the Republicans base, where a large number of candidates unified their party.

Now for the possible conjecture/prediction on my part from observation. In the Democrat's nomination process, there were a lot of people who supported and were excited for both Hillary and Bernie. However after Hillary won the nomination, you had a significant portion of people who were fired up for Bernie simply throw up their hands and sit out the actual election even in spite of Bernie telling his followers to vote for Hillary. Now imagine this same process occurring with 20 candidates instead of the 5 that the Democrats started out with. Many of these 20 candidates are rather congenial and could inspire a cult following. The result would be an even further divided electorate, that is even less likely to compromise and vote for the eventual winner.
edit on 13-3-2019 by dubiousatworst because: Edited in graph



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 03:03 AM
link   
I would be very careful, no one thought Trump would win in 2016 and they all sounded a lot like you.
Don’t count your chickens till they hatch.

With that said I agree, I think 2020 will be a bigger win than 2016


MAGA, Go Trump!!!!



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 03:14 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 03:15 AM
link   
What about MASA ... make America Sane again.... I'll sell the fedora's...
It's a show permutations of the news. Takes awhile to see that... and the show goes on and on and on....

Trump a showman... (maybe for the good) but who is behind the scenes.

do what thou wilt , (within the political context)... yea freedom ! MAGAMAGAMAGA GAMA A



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 03:27 AM
link   
I thought the same thing. I had to look into campaign finance laws to see what happens to all the $ left over. What happens is a lot of these people pay people fake (read, VERY HIGH) salaries or contracts, and maybe to businesses as well. It can later be laundered back to them either in a business they own, or through consulting fees or whatever. It's a huge scam.



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 03:34 AM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

I would love to see Michelle Obama as next president. That would push you Trumpsters really over the edge.



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 03:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple




I would love to see Michelle Obama as next president. That would push you Trumpsters really over the edge.


As a man ?
edit on 3132019 by frenchfries because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 03:40 AM
link   
a reply to: frenchfries

As woman with a huge dick



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 03:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Peeple

...and maybe Germany will invade America after that.

I Don't care about politics . but rooting for Trump , cause it's the lesser evil in the greater magick.



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 03:46 AM
link   
Here's a good contender.

Holy s#$%...lol

Worth a watch


edit on 3 by Mandroid7 because: Added2



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 04:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: matafuchs

I would love to see Michelle Obama as next president. That would push you Trumpsters really over the edge.


From an outsider/overseas point of view.

Who the heck is Michelle Obama? Oh,,got it,,,sorry,,, is she the wife of a former president? I think that's a bigly fail. (look at history) And,,,I don't need trump. So I really don't care but if the Obama lady was running and actually won, I guess it would be because she is really really a smart 'person'. Really really smart.

Good luck USA with that.

Bally



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 04:18 AM
link   
The list of dem candidates is nothing more than a list of losers, degenerates, racists, rich one percenters, liars and a fricken socialist.

Every single thing the left ‘claims’ to be ‘against’.

The funniest thing I’ve seen since 2016 is the current dems candidacy.

One clown just said Michelle Obama! Bwaaah haaa haaa. I hope she’s ‘the one’ too! Ha ha haaa.

From today’s standpoint, November 2020 is not a date the left is looking forward to.

President Trump can VERY safely make plans for the next six years. There is literally ZERO competition.

And as for the current First Lady, she’s looking down her nose at her scumbag predecessor, with good reason.



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 06:26 AM
link   
Even your democracy sucks.

There is no way for a candidate in "the" competing party to put up a fight over presidence?

Is this just a wet dream of the hard-on republicans on this board or does your party system suck so very much that there is no one who can compete against a loud mouthbreather?



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 07:21 AM
link   


2020 is a given for Donald Trump.


Green New Deal.

Kicking 170 million Americans off their private healthcare( Even Unions won't put up with it) called Medicare for All.

Openly lobbying for socialism.

Fake Hate Crimes.

Anti Electoral College pacts.

Gun control.

Obama/DOJ/DNC collusion to rig the last election.

Anyone that votes Democrat in 2020 is a moron.

And we know the only people that will are ideologues,illegals immigrants,dead people, and machine rigging.

I wish Trump would be a shoe in in 2020.

But people need to get real. The next election will be no different than the last one.

D's will cheat their arses off yet again.



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: ManFromEurope




Even your democracy sucks.

That would probably be because we do not have a democracy.
Seems your education on the subject is what sucks.



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

Tulsi Gabbard seems legit.

I think she would be better off running in 2024, but either way she seems to be genuine and not just riding whatever platform is trending on twitter.



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 08:15 AM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs




2020 is a given for Donald Trump. Fact.

I agree but for a different reason.
After the Special Council report is turned in and it shows nothing damning for Trump, Trump will again be able to portray himself as "the outsider", and point to the fisa abuse and bs investigations as proof. He will be able to point out law enforcement abuse and paint himself as the anti-corruption candidate.
The sad part is the dems gave him and continue to give him the ammo for this.
He will get sympathy from the american public for the abuse from law enforcement.



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 09:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: frenchfries

As woman with a huge dick


So that would make Barry the First ??????



new topics

top topics



 
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join