It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

page: 7
133
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 11:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: MetalThunder

What, exactly is so corrupt about President Trump and his administration?



Consider the source
She is living in a hall of mirrors
Peace




posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 11:53 AM
link   
a reply to: SeeItReddit

It's Mister Flying Fox to you.





edit on 3-3-2019 by FlyingFox because: boom



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 11:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX


also, "q" always uses the cropped image...


That's because rockets don't have mile long fire that shots out the back.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 11:56 AM
link   
a reply to: FlyingFox

Thanks for playing.

Now in those two photos, you see both where the missile launched from and you don't see the missile itself, just its trail.

Correct? Now take that information and apply it to the other photo. Do you see where it launched from? Do you see what looks like a missile body? Tada!


Also note how its brighter in the missile launches at the bottom rather than the top.

Compare this to the other photo.
edit on 3-3-2019 by SeeItReddit because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

Awesome

Sweet Sixteen
It my party and I'l cry if I want too

Let's Rain in The Pain




posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: dashen

There is no way a rocket would make a fire plum that long.



You are a special kind my friend



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: FlyingFox



Are those missiles and not tracer rounds?

What is the exposure on those cameras?


(post by Obummer removed for a manners violation)

posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep

That's because rockets don't have mile long fire that shots out the back.







posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: SeeItReddit
a reply to: FlyingFox

Thanks for playing.

Now in those two photos, you see both where the missile launched from and you don't see the missile itself, just its trail.

Correct? Now take that information and apply it to the other photo. Do you see where it launched from? Do you see what looks like a missile body? Tada!


Also note how its brighter in the missile launches at the bottom rather than the top.

Compare this to the other photo.


This makes more sense than anything anyone has said so far. Very logical. Because yes that would be one gigantic missile if we could see it that clearly yet it fired from so far away we cant see.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: FlyingFox

What is the exposure on those pics though.

Remember we are talking about a 20 sec exposure here guys.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: scraedtosleep

originally posted by: SeeItReddit
a reply to: FlyingFox

Thanks for playing.

Now in those two photos, you see both where the missile launched from and you don't see the missile itself, just its trail.

Correct? Now take that information and apply it to the other photo. Do you see where it launched from? Do you see what looks like a missile body? Tada!


Also note how its brighter in the missile launches at the bottom rather than the top.

Compare this to the other photo.


This makes more sense than anything anyone has said so far. Very logical. Because yes that would be one gigantic missile if we could see it that clearly yet it fired from so far away we cant see.


It's far enough away to know it might not be a rocket...

But it might be a tracer round?



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:13 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:14 PM
link   
Could you see helicopter lights or an ICBM better from a distance?

Since the helicopter company claims they fly that route on a routine basis, where are the similar images generated from these flights?

[SNIPPED]
edit on 3.4.2019 by Kandinsky because: Removed ill-mannered comment



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: dashen

Don’t play dumb. If it was a rocket/missile, it’s trail would reach to the ground/horizon.

That fact is undeniable.



Bull
Been running a sky for 5 year and a bit
at 20 sec. lol
Show me the time stamp overlap on picture to get this effect LOL




posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Obummer

It depends on if they originals from Flying Fox or just the first hits he found in google.
I asked Fox to do it next time and he responded with those photos so you can see why someone could assume they are originals.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: FlyingFox

Haha the equivalent of running away.

Maybe you should direct that to the weather cam providers, or perhaps even view some of their other galleries yourself. You know, research.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:23 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Obummer

Thanks for that. I've also seen countless stills from Skunkbay and it is a #ing helicopter.

I guess that makes us even.... except all the pesky evidence I posted. I'll sum it up again.


Evidence that supports a helicopter:
- Radar data of a helicopter in that location, at that time.

- Confirmation from the crew that flew the route.

- An image that matches the light trails left by the moving boats in the same video, which is consistent with what one would expect from a long exposure shot of a vehicle with multiple lights.

- Basic photography knowledge that moving objects generally disappear on long exposures, confirmed by the boats in the video.

Evidence that supports a missile:
- It looks like a missile


Isn't it normal procedure for the thread gang got harrass the person with low post-count who starts posting in here? Claim they "glow" or whatever? Strange that it seems selective.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 12:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Obummer

Thanks for that. I've also seen countless stills from Skunkbay and it is a #ing helicopter.

I guess that makes us even.... except all the pesky evidence I posted. I'll sum it up again.


Evidence that supports a helicopter:
- Radar data of a helicopter in that location, at that time.

- Confirmation from the crew that flew the route.

- An image that matches the light trails left by the moving boats in the same video, which is consistent with what one would expect from a long exposure shot of a vehicle with multiple lights.

- Basic photography knowledge that moving objects generally disappear on long exposures, confirmed by the boats in the video.

Evidence that supports a missile:
- It looks like a missile


P.s Do you know whose seen more Skunkbay stills than you? The owner of Skunkbays who confirmed its a helicopter. But i'm sure he was just bought off or something right?

skunkbayweather.blogspot.com...
edit on 3-3-2019 by SeeItReddit because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
133
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join