It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

page: 330
<< 327  328  329    331  332  333 >>

log in


posted on Apr, 6 2019 @ 11:24 PM
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Extraordinary Rendition

is the government-sponsored abduction and extrajudicial transfer of a person from one country to another with the purpose of circumventing the former country's laws on interrogation, detention and torture. Such renditions have predominantly been carried out by the United States government, with the consent of the other countries involved.

Planes alleged to have been used for extraordinary rendition

Aircraft Linked to CIA Extraordinary Rendition Flights

posted on Apr, 6 2019 @ 11:42 PM
a reply to: Sabrechucker

Marry me Phoenix! JK

So sorry mate.

You are into Sabre Chucking and I refuse to throw away a perfectly functioning sword.

I am into Katanas. Sorry, compatibility is low.


posted on Apr, 6 2019 @ 11:46 PM

Generated from Q one-liners.

posted on Apr, 6 2019 @ 11:47 PM
a reply to: pheonix358

I must say I am crushed!.. I think we can still find common Q ground. I shall chuck my Sabre elsewhere.

Good stuff

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 12:21 AM
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Excellent work EMN, thanks!

Quid Pro Quo... is this just a coincidence?

Q Post #358 from Dec 15 2017 01:03:02 reads:

Being advised to update code.
Serious hardware being used to break.
4 is not secure.

Guess what the simple gematria for the whole post is.... 737(Max?)

Timestamp2Acronym gives ACB:
Air Crew Brief
Air Crew Bulletin
Air Contingency Bulletin
Analysis Control Board
Aircraft Certification Board

Did Q really foretell of the two 737Max disasters, that happened in October 2018 and March 2019, back in December 2017???

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 12:25 AM
a reply to: MountainLaurel

Good value add thanks ML!

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 12:27 AM
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

It's all fine and dandy Rel..We need to promote change....Now. Your a great mind...but where are we going?

Our POTUS has laid a brick.

I call BS

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 12:43 AM
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

EMN, #731 is 3 posts in 1, so you've identified a bug in my calcs...

@Snowden "Truth To Power"
Drop "Truth To Power"

>>325370 You will cease to exist

Coincidence "Truth To Power"?
Coincidence Barlow?
What if Snowden was still a Clown?
Why would it be important he was in Russia?

CAPS only for each sub post are:
YTL = 57 - my originally reference post on Senator McCain
CTTPCBLWSCWRLEARN = 212 (Post says "Do you believe n coincidences")

Whole post total is therefore 436
Q Post #436 which lists "US SEN NO NAME>" as "ONE OF 22"!

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 12:58 AM
a reply to: Sabrechucker

PMd you Sabre!

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 01:05 AM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


edit on Sun Apr 7 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: 15d.) Cross-Posting: You will not cross-post content from other discussion boards (unless you receive advance written permission from TAN or their agents).

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 01:09 AM
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Ah, good! I was scratching my head for a bit. Amazing even with the correction you come upon Sen No Name again! Which is specified twice in Q436.
Now with Gematria I like to look across several ciphers.

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 01:13 AM
a reply to: Trillium

He was probably burned out. I know I would have been. The QResearch BO has no control over Q's private board so no worries on that front.

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 03:01 AM
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

EMN, I'm not sure I've got the energy to build up the other 5 gematria methods in the spreadsheet. If we see a few relevant proofs of use of another method then I'll look at building it in.

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 03:42 AM

originally posted by: LurkNoMore

Drop #1082 April 8, 2018

The “Start.” = New START arms treaty with Russia?

Article from November 2017
Uranium One and New START

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 04:06 AM
With regards to the theory that 2019 events reflect Q posts "a year ago" and therefore 2019 is the FUTURE which proves 2018 PAST, does anyone know what the accepted view is of how many days ahead of schedule Q says we are?

Q Post #264, on Jan 5 2019, said:📁
(2 days ahead of schedule)

... but I'm unsure whether that is 2 says ahead of an already revised schedule.
Here's why I ask... Q#985 on Apr 2 2018 20:57:40 says:

The timestamp is key.

Using timestamp2acronym decode method, 20:57:40 becomes TEN.
If this represents the Ten Days of Darkness in #88 then I think we are 4 days and 4 hours ahead of schedule because Q's last post #3310was on Mar 29 2019 16:57:28 and on Monday evening ten days of darkness will finish.

Apr 2, 20:57:40 - Mar 29, 16:57:28 = 4 days 4 hours.

Why is this important?

Well if we are 4 days ahead of schedule then we need to read Q posts from Apr 3, 2018 to understand what will happen on Apr 7= today, and for Apr 8 = tomorrow, we look at Apr 4, 2018:

#995 was first post of Apr 3, 2018:

Future proves past.
Several today.
[1 day]
Keep watching the news.



PREPARED AT ALL COSTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(that's 188 exclamation marks - not 187)


+ ++ +++


For Monday we would look at Apr 4 2018 to get #1010 which ends with:

UK/GER [5 days].
Choice is yours.

All the above is dependent upon knowing how far ahead of the original schedule Q is!

edit on 7-4-2019 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 04:07 AM
a reply to: tiredoflooking

In a communique released by Cannataci “in order to maximise transparency and minimise speculation” the UN rapporteur recounted his continual communications with the Ecuadorean government from March 29 until April 3 when he was given permission to visit Assange April 25

UN Rapporteur Finally Gets To Meet With Assange April 25

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 04:37 AM
I don't believe this cover story:

On his granny’s secret service: Prince William interns at MI5, MI6 and GCHQ

If things do kick off this week then it seems more than a coincidence that the "heir apparent" has spent the last 3 weeks in turn at:

SIS (MI6) headquarters (CIA equivalent)
MI5 Headquarters (FBI equivalent)
GCHQ (NSA equivalent-ish)

This looks more like the deputy chief exec being briefed on:

1) How UK will be "attacked" by US/POTUS/Q, e.g. by DECLAS,
2) How the UK, and Royal family in particular, can be protected,
3) What preventative measures and counter-attacks are available via GCHQ?

From the equivalent BBC article:

William worked exceptionally hard to embed himself in the team and comfortably held his own amongst some highly skilled analysts and operators.

His Royal Highness asked some probing questions and demonstrated a real grasp of our mission.

edit on 7-4-2019 by RelSciHistItSufi because: FISA declas

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 05:34 AM
Another prop rolling into place re FISA declas: Charlie Rowley: Novichok victim meets Russian ambassador.


1) Somebody tried to kill Sergei Skripal and his daughter using Novichok,
2) There is circumstantial evidence that Skripal may have been involved with Christopher Steele and the Fusion GPS dossier. He was a Russian double agent and Steele was his handler,
3) Sometime after the Skripals' poisoning, Charlie Rowley picked up a thrown away perfume bottle and gave it to his girlfriend. It contained the Novichok and killed the girlfriend and put him in a coma, causing strokes and the need for a pacemaker,
4) The UK tried to lynch Russia with the blame but Putin warned them to back off because they were going to be very embarrassed when the truth came out.

What was revealed on the TV report of the item was that the Russian ambassador said he would speak to Putin to see what else he could find out... hence lined up now for Putin to reveal who really poisoned the Skripals.

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 06:21 AM
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
If a BBC article pushes the angle that Russia was behind the poisonings, I am inclined to believe it was either the UK or US that did it. They have more reason to silence Skripal than Russia did.

posted on Apr, 7 2019 @ 07:27 AM
a reply to: butcherguy

If Russia wanted to kill them wouldn't they have just done so?

They kind of have a track record of that.

You're right it stinks of a set up the whole drawn out drama of it makes no sense from Russia's perspective.

top topics

<< 327  328  329    331  332  333 >>

log in