It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Evidence that supports a helicopter:
- Radar data of a helicopter in that location, at that time.
- Confirmation from the crew that flew the route.
- An image that matches the light trails left by the moving boats in the same video, which is consistent with what one would expect from a long exposure shot of a vehicle with multiple lights.
- Basic photography knowledge that moving objects generally disappear on long exposures, confirmed by the boats in the video.
Evidence that supports a missile:
- It looks like a missile
originally posted by: Chadwickus
15 Feb 2019 - 6:04:25 AM
Remember the cover story for this?
Coincidence re: AF1 re: CA route NK?
Bigger than 25th amendment attempt to remove.
Depth of this is very serious.
It was a helicopter 100%
If a long exposure is taken of a fast moving object, generally the object is either heavily distorted, or invisible. For example, in this long exposure photograph of a highway, the light trails are visible, but the vehicles themselves are not.
If the mystery object was a missile, we would not expect the body of it to be captured on a long exposure shot.
originally posted by: SeeItReddit
I thought the missile vs helicopter debate had already been concluded?
Did Q ever state it was a Missile? I thought it was just anons.
Untrained eyes it sure looks like a missile, but it isn't.
Shut Dashen down at all cost