It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

page: 3
118
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:45 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

yeah it was one of those heli's that move thousands of miles per hour on take off. Obviously.




posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:46 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

Uh no, the trail stays there a good long while, like in the long exposure photo of the actual missile.

And they’re not cars, they’re boats.

Not as observant as you think you are, are you?



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:47 AM
link   
ThoroughDebunk

I think its pretty open shut.


Evidence that supports a helicopter:
- Radar data of a helicopter in that location, at that time.

- Confirmation from the crew that flew the route.

- An image that matches the light trails left by the moving boats in the same video, which is consistent with what one would expect from a long exposure shot of a vehicle with multiple lights.

- Basic photography knowledge that moving objects generally disappear on long exposures, confirmed by the boats in the video.

Evidence that supports a missile:
- It looks like a missile


Watch the videos and compare the boats that cross the screen.

Consider that if as you say the 20 second exposure only started after its launched that its travelled a fairly insignificant distance for a missile, it would be a very ineffectual slow launch.
edit on 3-3-2019 by SeeItReddit because: (no reason given)


+5 more 
posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:47 AM
link   
a reply to: booyakasha

Obviously.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:48 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

So... cars going across the water? I think your looking for the word "boat".



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus


Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
15 Feb 2019 - 6:04:25 AM

Remember the cover story for this?
Helicopter?
Coincidence re: AF1 re: CA route NK?
Bigger than 25th amendment attempt to remove.
Depth of this is very serious.
Q


It was a helicopter 100%

www.thedrive.com...





Having flown in them I never felt like we could do a big fat burnout like that. There may be a Helicopter there too so we can tell this one with a straight face whilst doing mental gymnastics.

Long exposure or not, the Helicopter doesn't have a flame and the blades would have left a very large wake. Imagine the red Helicopter they had and push that image down a screen by adding the incremental movement of the image if you want to understand why I disagree with your reply. The mandatory colored lighting of the aircraft would leave traces even at a distance.
edit on 3-3-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

There are several moving objects in that video none of which leave a streak or only appear in one frame except for your magic helicopter



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:51 AM
link   
a reply to: SeeItReddit

Yea, those.
I meant the stuff going on in the background though



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:53 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

You've cracked it, Helicopters can't move faster than Boats. Case closed.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:56 AM
link   

If a long exposure is taken of a fast moving object, generally the object is either heavily distorted, or invisible. For example, in this long exposure photograph of a highway, the light trails are visible, but the vehicles themselves are not.

static.wixstatic.com... 604a45bb8591a3186b745f~mv2.webp

If the mystery object was a missile, we would not expect the body of it to be captured on a long exposure shot.


The super fast missile decided to slow down at the end for the perfect photo.

edit on 3-3-2019 by SeeItReddit because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:57 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 06:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: SeeItReddit
I thought the missile vs helicopter debate had already been concluded?

Did Q ever state it was a Missile? I thought it was just anons.

TheDrive

KitsapSun

SkunkBay

Untrained eyes it sure looks like a missile, but it isn't.


NAZI's taught to 'keep repeating the lies, the bigger they are the more people will believe them"

And I quoted.....


+1 more 
posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 06:02 AM
link   
a reply to: SeeItReddit

I'm glad we can put this ugliness behind us now.


+1 more 
posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 07:50 AM
link   


It's going to be HISTORIC!

Thanks Dashen again for all the hard work!

I see the 4am talking points are out for #16



Shut Dashen down at all cost



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 07:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Chadwickus

There are several moving objects in that video none of which leave a streak or only appear in one frame except for your magic helicopter

Not a magic helicopter
It was "Airwolf"
Sounds like a few folks are fans of that old series.


+1 more 
posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 07:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Sostratus


No worries. There's like six or seven of me at least.
They can't shut All of Me Down



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 07:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

I LOVED THAT SHOW



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 08:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Gothmog

I LOVED THAT SHOW

Unfortunately , it was never real life as some seem to believe.
There were very few JATO choppers , much less Jet powered copters.
I liked it and my wife did as well (She had a crush on Jan)



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 08:33 AM
link   
Excelsior

What will this new day bring ....
Remember knowledge will bewilder the ignorant Everytime



edit on 332019 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 08:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Right because you’re not Q.




top topics



 
118
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join