It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

page: 296
133
<< 293  294  295    297  298  299 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:05 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik


This is all meaningless and endless conversation until Q produces actual results.

Pretty good statement dask. Although my opinion is that it's not meaningless, because I have personally learned SO much since I started following thread one.

My point is why do you insist on arguing and forcing your opinion on everyone?
Why can't you conversate and debate like a grownup. If you disagree or see a flaw, state that, and why. If they do not see it your way still, that means they do not see it your way still. Move on. I believe YOU are that reason for the endless bickering and conversations that last multiple pages and go no where that you pointed out.

"Everyone" else sees that multiple angles and different opinions are brought in here. I don't agree with a some of the common angles discussed. I don't feel the need to fight over it. And I sure as hell am not going to condescend to others that are attempting to expand the conversation.

On the other hand I will confront those who I believe are attempting to limit the conversation and discourage.




posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:06 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:12 AM
link   
a reply to: 40CalTone

I'm not forcing anything on anyone. I disagree and see a flaw and share my opinion. Sometimes I type my opinion out in a form that can be misinterpreted and someone comes along and accuses me of having said something I didn't mean, like in this case, because they didn't think to take into account the post I was replying to.

That post said anons are here to gather information so that it can be introduced as evidence. I addressed that claim and then someone came in saying that I was speaking about all Q followers. Even after I "walked it back", it wasn't enough for them to say "OK, he didn't mean what I thought he meant". What are you going to do, right?



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:16 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:17 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

Fair point but it's also dependent upon perspective. Correct me if I'm wrong here. From your perspective Q is meaningless unless high level arrests occur? Maybe you can clarify what classifies as "results" just to make sure you're not being misunderstood.

That aside you don't see any value (the opposite of meaningless) in the publicly available information in many of the Q drops that connect the dots to some interesting and disturbing political relationships / events that many (myself included) never knew existed?

The conspiracy aspect aside you have to admit there has been a lot of revealing and interesting information disseminated by Q.



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:27 AM
link   
a reply to: 40CalTone

I like to think that it gives me an objectivity, which is not agenda driven, that results in honest debate. I lack the bias that others might have because they need the truth to mold itself to their preconceived notions.



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:33 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:38 AM
link   
a reply to: 1point92AU

So for the love of God, stop responding!

P



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:38 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:43 AM
link   
a reply to: 1point92AU

You are correct, it is subjective.

Q said early on that the goal was high level arrests. If they don't happen then that is a goal they failed on, which they themselves set.

Connecting dots is what we have been doing before Q, and Q rehashed much of the info already on sites like ATS. Is there value in making it more popular and spreading it to a wider audience? Sure, but that doesn't have much to do with my participation.

The information may be interesting, depending on who you ask, but it might not lead to the end that follows the goal of "The Plan". If that is the case then we can Occam razor our way to the conclusion that the Q movement failed or that the fulfillment of "The Plan" was never really the goal.

Right now my mind tells me that it is just a vote gathering machine. If it works, than good for whoever thought it up.
edit on 1-4-2019 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:46 AM
link   
a reply to: 1point92AU

I always discuss Q in a meaningful way. I am unable to let my hopes or wishful thinking get in the way of the facts. How is that not the best way to get to the truth?



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:49 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:49 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:51 AM
link   
More info on Rhodes scholars:

Harry Potter, Fabians, Jesuits, Rhodes & Fulbright Scholars


Now it is not simply coincidence that our president, Clinton, happens to be a Rhodes Scholar; that the Supreme Allied Commander of Europe, General Wesley Clark happens to be a Rhodes Scholar; that the Deputy Secretary of State, Strobe Talbot, is a Rhodes Scholar.  In fact, Rhodes Scholars are at every level of our government. They are working within our major banks, our industries.  They are the presidents of our colleges because the men who were taken from the United States and from Europe, from the various British colonies and sent to Oxford for a Rhodes Scholarship are indoctrinated in these ideas of world government—Indoctrinated in the idea that we really need an elite to rule the world, because you common people are incapable of governing yourselves.  After three years they return to America to key positions.  –  Dr. Stanley Monteith


zaidpub.com...


The Deep State Rhodes Scholars Who created NATO

www.veteranstoday.com...



What is the Fabian Society and to What End was it Created?
canadianpatriot.org...



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:54 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 12:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
More info on Rhodes scholars:

Harry Potter, Fabians, Jesuits, Rhodes & Fulbright Scholars


Now it is not simply coincidence that our president, Clinton, happens to be a Rhodes Scholar; that the Supreme Allied Commander of Europe, General Wesley Clark happens to be a Rhodes Scholar; that the Deputy Secretary of State, Strobe Talbot, is a Rhodes Scholar.  In fact, Rhodes Scholars are at every level of our government. They are working within our major banks, our industries.  They are the presidents of our colleges because the men who were taken from the United States and from Europe, from the various British colonies and sent to Oxford for a Rhodes Scholarship are indoctrinated in these ideas of world government—Indoctrinated in the idea that we really need an elite to rule the world, because you common people are incapable of governing yourselves.  After three years they return to America to key positions.  –  Dr. Stanley Monteith


zaidpub.com...


The Deep State Rhodes Scholars Who created NATO

www.veteranstoday.com...



What is the Fabian Society and to What End was it Created?
canadianpatriot.org...



Good refresher. The article on The Deep State Rhodes Scholars was a good read. Cecil Rhodes said himself:

“Why should we not form a secret society with but one object the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under British rule for the recovery of the United States for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire…”
edit on 1-4-2019 by 1point92AU because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 01:11 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 01:17 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 01:21 AM
link   
Can't believe I missed this. 🤦‍♀️

Barry Sternlicht who is the co-founder of Sydell Group (parent company of Starwood Hotels and W Hotels) sits on the board of Robinhood Foundation. The Bezos sit on this board also. I found my way back to this foundation while digging and noticed a familiar NGO. Mariana Edelman is the founder of Childrens Defense Fund. I almost choked when I saw this because you guys will never guess who sits on the board of directors of CDF. This is MAGA country's sister Jurnee Smollett-Bell. 😁

So many twist and turns in this saga. No wonder Q reminds us to buckle our seatbelts.

ETA:


Smollett-Bell has been active in HIV/AIDS causes since she was 11. She was inspired by the HIV/AIDS survivor Hydeia Broadbent. Later Hydeia and Jurnee worked together for HIV/AIDS awareness. They also worked for Black AIDS Institute and Red Cross.[20] 


Smollett-Bell wiki
edit on 1am401America/ChicagoMon, 01 Apr 2019 01:41:27 -050041412019-04-01T01:41:27-05:00 by wanderingconfusion because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2019 @ 01:27 AM
link   
a reply to: wanderingconfusion

Oh Boy !!!!!!!!!!!!

😊



new topics

top topics



 
133
<< 293  294  295    297  298  299 >>

log in

join