It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

page: 288
133
<< 285  286  287    289  290  291 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 04:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
What public evidence are you talking about

You have not been following the thread?

XAX said if Q has everything they are sittingon it while people are being abused.

Skada said Q can't leak it because it would be inadmissible in court.

I said they could have done it as anons in a couple months after Trump took office.

You jumped in saying "The cabal isn't going to allow it"

But others throughout these threads and in other forums say they have a mountain of evidence and "Here Comes The PAIN".

Either you or they are wrong because both things can't be true.



All the public evidence that I've seen has come directly from whistleblowers but they are either ridiculed as liars or conspiracy theorists or they end up dead. I haven't seen any actual physical evidence i.e. Videos or texts/emails directly correlating guilt. All the leaked pics and footage I've seen so far only alludes to nefarious activities. I believe there is actual physical evidence of the rituals of torture, rape and murder committed by government officials, actors and elite. I think that what has already been exposed is a message to the cabal aka we have it*all*. All the blackmail dossier s, the pics, the videos, the messages...everything.

Why it all hasn't been leaked to the public, I can't answer that because I don't know the plan. I told you I believe it's partly because the cabal could potentially create another FF on the scale of 9/11 but that could be just a part of the reason why they're still sitting on it.

As far as people continuing to be abused, I believe Trump has been working on the crack down by going after human traffickers




posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 04:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
All the public evidence that I've seen has come directly from whistleblowers...

So you agree with the stance that Q isn't about gathering evidence that is admissible in court? Glad to have you aboard, although I don't get why you are arguing about it.



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
All the public evidence that I've seen has come directly from whistleblowers...

So you agree with the stance that Q isn't about gathering evidence that is admissible in court? Glad to have you aboard, although I don't get why you are arguing about it.



No, I don't agree with that at all. What about the blackmail dossiers, you don't think that evidence will be admissible in court?



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
No, I don't agree with that at all.

You just said:
"All the public evidence that I've seen has come directly from whistleblowers"

That means it wasn't Q and his merry band of anons. You do understand that is what was being discussed?


What about the blackmail dossiers, you don't think that evidence will be admissible in court?


Anons found blackmail dossiers?

Links please.
edit on 30-3-2019 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:09 PM
link   


twitter.com...



twitter.com...




twitter.com...


#CreepyJoe

I'm going to flounce the thread since that's what we r doing.



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
No, I don't agree with that at all.

You just said:
"All the public evidence that I've seen has come directly from whistleblowers"

That means it wasn't Q and his merry band of anons. You do understand that is what was being discussed?


What about the blackmail dossiers, you don't think that evidence will be admissible in court?


Anons found blackmail dossiers?

Links please.


Are you purposely misunderstanding me because that's what I'm sensing. I don't know what evidence Q has access to, I haven't seen it. I have heard of blackmail dossiers and it would make total sense to me if politicians/actors/elites are initiated or jumped in to the upper echelon of the secret societies by being forced to perform rape/murder rituals that their activities would be documented for future reference



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: daskakik

Exactly, they really switched, I believe when people started saying "Q" was getting people to not vote

reading some past "Q" drops though, you really see how much of a blatant fail things are


like last year when they said Trump already ordered the "DECLAS" etc



Trump did order the declassification of the Russia documents last year.



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Don't doubt he took meth to drive 12 hours straight but 2 yr addict? He looks way too clean for a meth head.
And a manuscript in the trunk? Sounds like from the same playbook.



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
Are you purposely misunderstanding me because that's what I'm sensing. I don't know what evidence Q has access to, I haven't seen it. I have heard of blackmail dossiers and it would make total sense to me if politicians/actors/elites are initiated or jumped in to the upper echelon of the secret societies by being forced to perform rape/murder rituals that their activities would be documented for future reference

You are the one that seems to be having a hard time grasping what was being discussed.

Q followers say that they have amassed a mountain of evidence in threads like these which can now be introduced as evidence.

You have not seen it? Then what are you even debating?

You have heard about blackmail dossiers but don't know if they even exist or if they are even entered as evidence? You have nothing, which is what I am saying, so what are you arguing against?



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:35 PM
link   


DJT tweet

Separate sentence: "We are getting stronger all over the world, watch!"

Activate the watch. Witch watch?



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:53 PM
link   
Gary Holland decode. Actual Q stuff.


mobile.twitter.com...



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: Creep Thumper

Seriously, no, you want to say that God and Trump and "Q" created the world... now you are trying to say the Mayans were "Q"

this is delusional


Mmmm, no, I didn't say that. All I said is that the figure in the middle of the calendar sticking out his tongue has made a "Q". Think about it.

Open mouth, stick out tongue, "Q".

Did I connect it to the movement? No. Just looking at things from a different perspective. I thought it might be interesting to others. I guess not.



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 05:56 PM
link   




Georgepap

"FISA that was issued on me to my Israel related work..."

The plot thickens...



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 06:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
Are you purposely misunderstanding me because that's what I'm sensing. I don't know what evidence Q has access to, I haven't seen it. I have heard of blackmail dossiers and it would make total sense to me if politicians/actors/elites are initiated or jumped in to the upper echelon of the secret societies by being forced to perform rape/murder rituals that their activities would be documented for future reference

You are the one that seems to be having a hard time grasping what was being discussed.

Q followers say that they have amassed a mountain of evidence in threads like these which can now be introduced as evidence.

You have not seen it? Then what are you even debating?

You have heard about blackmail dossiers but don't know if they even exist or if they are even entered as evidence? You have nothing, which is what I am saying, so what are you arguing against?


Ok let me see if I can simplify this to avoid misunderstanding...

I believe there is physical evidence to back up Q's claims that these people are evil ( blackmail dossiers)


I believe one of the reasons that the evidence hasn't been leaked is because the cabal still retains enough power to go scorched earth. So it isn't released for our own protection

Yes, I believe there are blackmail dossiers because it sounds plausible. Politics is dirty like that.

Everything we're discussing here is theoretical. I'm throwing out ideas that seem plausible to me and you're doing the same. Fact of the matter is, neither one of us has evidence to back up our theories. I can't prove there's physical evidence and you can't prove that Q is a larp. We just have to wait and see
edit on 30-3-2019 by cherokeetroy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 06:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
I believe...

Nobody was talking about what you believe. We were discussing the claim by others that the Q movement was put into effect to gather evidence because although Q has everything, they can't just drop it.

My point was that they could as anons.

You jumped in and said the cabal would never allow it. One of those claims has to be wrong. That is it. Nothing else. I don't even know what you are arguing about.



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 06:15 PM
link   
CNN and DEMOCRATIC party leaders react to Mueller clearing Trump: (humor)
twitter.com...
edit on Sat Mar 30 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 06:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
I believe...

Nobody was talking about what you believe. We were discussing the claim by others that the Q movement was put into effect to gather evidence because although Q has everything, they can't just drop it.

My point was that they could as anons.

You jumped in and said the cabal would never allow it. One of those claims has to be wrong. That is it. Nothing else. I don't even know what you are arguing about.


Your point is that*you believe* they could use anons...



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 06:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: cherokeetroy
Your point is that*you believe* they could use anons...

No. I have been saying for the past couple of pages that that is a weak excuse that was thrown out a while back until someone decided to post it again.

Either way, your claim and theirs is mutually exclusive. You can't have it both ways.



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 06:31 PM
link   

Enough of thread sliding you few can PM each other your thoughts. Let’s get back to seeking truth and shining light too much wasted space....



posted on Mar, 30 2019 @ 06:34 PM
link   
a reply to: airforcerulessky

That guy is a high octane tweeter.


Some of his tweets in that thread reminds me of what '0311Warrior' said last night regards to some they are raiding/arresting/capturing will be treated as ENEMY COMBATANTS, some will go missing from from public view very soon -- along those lines. My next thought was is GiTMO ready for new guests.? He also mentioned 'Blacksites active'.

www.abovetopsecret.com... (12 posts not deleted on this page if anyone missed)

www.abovetopsecret.com...



new topics

top topics



 
133
<< 285  286  287    289  290  291 >>

log in

join