-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

a reply to: MetalThunder
You have to admit, Maxine Waters *is* an expert on money laundering.

But I've yet to hear anything resembling a coherent theory on how Trump is supposed to have committed money laundering. Until someone offers one, this just seems to be little more than a stereotype of the evil big businessman.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

It is crazy.

In fact its completely insane that instead of the President cheating on his wife with a pronstar each side is arguing over whether the payments were legal or not. lol

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Has she ever really been investigated? Like, Trump level investigated? Seems to me there have been a couple half assed attempts to simply fill out the required paperwork, but no real investigations. Hopefully that will all change soon.

a reply to: SeenItBelieveIt

Except cheating on your wife with a pornstar is not illegal, and if infidelity was against the law, then half of our elected leaders would be looking at jail time.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

You missed the point.

I wasn't suggesting it was in anyway, just that it would be considered a scandal in previous times but in todays age its not even the tip of the iceberg compared to whats gone on from the Dems.

Its all about whats legal and morals are off from both sides.

a reply to: SeenItBelieveIt

Oh ok, yeah I understand now. The thing about Trump supporters is this - most are probably older and have known about Donald Trumps proclivities for decades now. Him frequenting the services of high priced escorts shocked no one, since it is behavior we have all known and come to expect from him. Not that that is right or wrong, its just the fact of the matter, IMO.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Has she ever really been investigated? Like, Trump level investigated? Seems to me there have been a couple half assed attempts to simply fill out the required paperwork, but no real investigations. Hopefully that will all change soon.

I think the answer is yes she has been investigated by several different orgs. at different times. Perhaps there are better goals than continual investigations. Maybe face the truth and focus on crimes instead of perceived crimes.

Then what would Q be on about?

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Has she ever really been investigated? Like, Trump level investigated? Seems to me there have been a couple half assed attempts to simply fill out the required paperwork, but no real investigations. Hopefully that will all change soon.

It seems to me most of Hillary investigations surrounded the embassy attack in Libya, and proving she knew it was a planned terrorist attack. Which was rather pointless because there's ultimately no crime there. Meanwhile, the investigation that put her in real jeopardy (the e-mail server) was personally squashed by James Comey.

In fact, this might have been the point: give the Republicans an ultimately-empty scandal (the embassy attack) to chase after, while the important investigation is quietly buried.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

And she has clearly broken the law egregiously many times. Any investigation that may have happened was when Obama was President, she was Sec of State, or she was running for POTUS. She has been protected more than anyone in the past 20 years. She is behind all of this B.S. happening to Trump. Her day of reckoning is coming. Her, Bill and the Clinton Foundation are as dirty as they come, and they continue to operate unchecked to this day.

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: Justoneman

I think that fantasizing about hill dog is a waste of time. The republicans have investigated here time and time again. It appears whatever she done she was allowed too and did not directly break any laws. It never surprises me what a politician can get away with. What surprises me even more is that there is a 15% chance we may see here in 2020 as granny potus. The good news is they already child proofed the whitehouse and launch capabilities. So there is that.

That idea in this reply is why you have DJT for Pres right now, your team doesn't get it. If they did get it they would pretend they didn't like they are. Think about this. Had she not been such a criminal, didn't steal the nomination literally from Bernie, then she wins over the "Nazi/Rapist in chief" your team calls him or worse.

Perhaps better yet for the immoral leftist, MAGA haters:
Had they allowed the rightful winner whom IMO was Bernie to win the nomination, then he has a much better chance and beats DJT if they let him run D. We all know he sure couldn't possibly lose much worse than she did. That defeat will leave a lasting scar on the lefty's.

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: MetalThunder

As corrupt as she allegedly is,
isn't it amazing how long
she has survived in politics
and how high up she has risen?
How does that even happen?
Who's helping or backing her?

The old saying that is about that idea goes

"Most politics is like Dairy farming. The scum and the crème rises to the top together. The Farmer must skim the scum out without sacrificing the crème".


Hmmmm.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

I think you explained it well. Trump had a highly known public affair in the past. He is a known "cheater" and never has been ashamed of it.

I was kind of shocked that stormy Daniel's got so much attention. Anyone who did research on trump knew that infidelity was no suprise..

a reply to: blueman12
Nobody really cared that Bill Clinton was a cheater either. It just provided an excuse
for Republicans to attack him.

Well this is new... I coulda sworn that they said he was taking a senior position in the Justice Department under AG Barr.

Matthew Whitaker, who served as acting US attorney general, has left the US Justice Dept., an official with knowledge of the matter tells @NBCNews; move comes after new AG Barr was recently confirmed and sworn in - @JuliaEAinsley

twitter.com...

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

I think it was more the fact that it happened in the Oval Office, with a subordinate, and then he lied about it.

Watch The Water

Now we are talking !

President Trump Takes Bold Step to Transition Veterans into US Merchant Marine

March 4th, 2019
On Monday, President Donald J. Trump will sign an executive order to help sea veterans seamlessly transition into the United States Merchant Marine. By simultaneously expanding veteran opportunities for great jobs at great wages while strengthening our Merchant Marine, this action embodies a key principle of the Trump administration: economic security is national security.

The civilian men and women of the United States Merchant Marine who pilot sealift vessels represent a mission-critical component of United States military readiness. During times of conflict, these mariners transport military goods such as tanks, helicopters, or even troops—often in hostile waters and at great personal risk.

In World War II alone, nearly 10,000 merchant mariners were killed by enemy fire and died at a rate of 1 in 26—a casualty rate higher than any branch of the United States military. Their willingness to serve and their sacrifice continue to play a vital role in America’s defense.

ETA - On The Record Press call

originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: PokeyJoe
I think you explained it well. Trump had a highly known public affair in the past. He is a known "cheater" and never has been ashamed of it.
..

In the average person's mind, Donald Trump has always had more in common with Hugh Heffner, than Pope ______. That's one reason why minority leaders saw him as one of them. Most of them were "players" too.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Whitaker probably wanted to be too hard on Democrats. Barr didn't like that. Could we be looking at Jeff Sessions 2.0 in the making?

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport

Ok, so HERE we see the “missile”

Taken from THIS video. (Opens a video file)

And HERE is an actual SM-3 launch.

Taken from HERE

Notice something? Like where the rocket trail begins for example?

And just so there’s no confusion, if it was a rocket/missile launch, the trail would go all the way to the ground/horizon.

What say you?

I’m trying to believe you

But why is the supposed helicopter light exactly the same colour and tone as the sunset ?

And what the hell are all those dots

To me this doesn’t appear to be a helicopter or a missile

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: Justoneman

I think that fantasizing about hill dog is a waste of time. The republicans have investigated here time and time again. It appears whatever she done she was allowed too and did not directly break any laws. It never surprises me what a politician can get away with. What surprises me even more is that there is a 15% chance we may see here in 2020 as granny potus. The good news is they already child proofed the whitehouse and launch capabilities. So there is that.

That idea in this reply is why you have DJT for Pres right now, your team doesn't get it. If they did get it they would pretend they didn't like they are. Think about this. Had she not been such a criminal, didn't steal the nomination literally from Bernie, then she wins over the "Nazi/Rapist in chief" your team calls him or worse.

Perhaps better yet for the immoral leftist, MAGA haters:
Had they allowed the rightful winner whom IMO was Bernie to win the nomination, then he has a much better chance and beats DJT if they let him run D. We all know he sure couldn't possibly lose much worse than she did. That defeat will leave a lasting scar on the lefty's.

If my choice was between potus and bernie and i had to vote i would go with potus.

They are not my team.