It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

page: 165
133
<< 162  163  164    166  167  168 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: airforcerulessky
a reply to: airforcerulessky

players in the game


qmap.pub...


WHO is #17?

Oh, Geez...it's Tony Podesta!
edit on 19-3-2019 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:21 AM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

So many possible variations for DNA.
I was looking at this mathematical observation made by Dali for GNA.
initial observations: (Guess)

7 sets of 4 loops (G7) with shadow detail optics
only 5 toes highlighted on (D6) figure
Two inverted ghost heads for (D7)"river" without trees
Square section of sphere with target for (E8)cannon balls(depressing)
If these were Sea Horse eggs there wouldn't be a shooter

I would think Political Q would use D as abbrev for Democratic?





edit on 19-3-2019 by Slichter because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3n19m470

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: 3n19m470

What's a Qproof? Q saying they were right? Sort of like when Trump does?


I don't think Trump is retarded. He said himself that he has a very large brain. Surely that means he isn't retarded.


An example of a Q proof is when someone on 8chan (that's the website Q communicates to the world on) says "hey Trump, if you are listening, use the word Amazing in your next Tweet" and within about 8 minutes the request is fulfilled on Trumps official Twitter.

Or when Q makes a post on 8chan and Trump makes a Tweet, and they are both posted at the exact same time to the minute (seconds are too difficult to align posting on different websites using different devices etc.) and both have a similar message.


Can you provide evidence of these two? Just one of each will be fine. If you don't mind taking them from your serious research. Thanks

edit on 19-3-2019 by SeenItBelieveIt because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:39 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:41 AM
link   
a reply to: SeenItBelieveIt

Go back and do some research yourself. It’s happened literally dozens of times. Keep denying what’s happening. Keep talking sh**. You’re only going to look more and more foolish. Have you not seen everything coming out that completely verified everything we’ve been talking about here? Let me guess, you still think Trump worked with Russia to cheat Hillary out of the Presidency?

Edit: Here you go
threadreaderapp.com...

edit on 19-3-2019 by PokeyJoe because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:47 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:48 AM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

First off Pokey, take a breath. I don't believe Trump worked with the Russian, especially not directly anyway, and think Hillary is more suited to a jail cell than the Whitehouse. Unfortunately you mistake questions as opposition, again, and snap away.

Secondly, I'm guessing you can't provide this evidence then, not that I even asked YOU to. Someone else made a claim and I just wanted to see the evidence they had to back it up. Otherwise aren't you all just repeating hot air?



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:53 AM
link   
a reply to: SeenItBelieveIt

Go back and check my reply. I included a link I just came across just for you.



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:55 AM
link   
a reply to: SeenItBelieveIt

If you want to know, read the sixteen threads. It is all covered in there.

This was the kind of response when I asked a question in the Yellowstone 'Superthread' years ago. No member was admonished for saying that to me.
edit on b000000312019-03-19T08:57:00-05:0008America/ChicagoTue, 19 Mar 2019 08:57:00 -0500800000019 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:56 AM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

I've read all those Proofs, none show what 3n19m470 claimed. So please give me the exhibit number from your link that does.

Otherwise take your own advice and research something before you post. Sheep.



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 08:58 AM
link   
a reply to: SeenItBelieveIt

Right. I’m the one here who’s a sheep. Sure thing buddy.

edit on 19-3-2019 by PokeyJoe because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 09:01 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

I've read a lot of the thread and as much Q stuff as I can find and can't find a legitimate proof of...


someone on 8chan (that's the website Q communicates to the world on) says "hey Trump, if you are listening, use the word Amazing in your next Tweet" and within about 8 minutes the request is fulfilled on Trumps official Twitter.


So... i've asked the user to provide the evidence as I'd like to see it. Yet I get a big ol bowl of hostility from people crying shill.

It would be great to see this proof as much as I believe a lot of the Q stuff, Trump direct involvement I don't. But hey... I guess questioning anything said here by the Q Crew is against the rules. Tow the party line and all that.



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 09:05 AM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

At least we agree here.

I mean you jumped into a reply I made to a different user, got angry real quick. Said the exact same thing that he said. Attempted to provide "evidence" with a link to another thread that didn't contain any evidence and then fell back on the making BS assumptions on my opinion on Trump/Hillary.

I mean you literally brought up "but but hillary" after I asked another user for his evidence, because I'd genuinely like to see it.

Reevaluate where you are heading with this mentality.



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 09:09 AM
link   
a reply to: SeenItBelieveIt
Do you understand how forums work? This isn’t a private conversation between you two. You asked for Q proofs. I provided you with a long list of Q proofs. Apparently those weren’t the specific Q proofs you were looking for. The thing you don’t seem to get is that we are so far beyond proving Qs legitimacy that it’s silly.


edit on 19-3-2019 by PokeyJoe because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-3-2019 by PokeyJoe because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 09:11 AM
link   
Last drop it was requested to listen to Nunes interview. He stated that he was suing Twitter to the tune of $250M, this is only the 1st lawsuit? Has Q not suggested Class action lawsuits? As of this moment Twitter stock is -$30.00/share? Biggest thing I took away from the interview is that this is 1/100s of suits against media for untrue news stories spread falsely. PANIC

Mockingbird is real and being taken down as we speak.

You are the news now!



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 09:13 AM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe



www.qmap.pub...
edit on 3 19 2019 by dashen because: Blubblub



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 09:15 AM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

No I didn't. I asked for two specific proofs that 3n19m470. From 3n19m470. Instead you've thrown a fit about it and decided to post the first google link from searching "Q Proof".

Now either go back and respond to what I actually posted, or tuck your tail and be quiet and i'll wait for 3n19m470 to provide the evidence on his two claims.



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: SeenItBelieveIt

Ok tough guy. Guess I’ll just be quiet now. You sure put me in my place. I think I’ll go to my safe space and have a nice cry about it.



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 09:19 AM
link   
a reply to: dashen

Now this is one I had seen and does add weight. Although its five days later and Trump deleted it, its close. Also interesting as Trump doesn't usually delete his misspelt tweets, AFAIK.

Hoping 3n19m470 has the 8 minutes one he claimed as that would be much better proof.



posted on Mar, 19 2019 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: LurkNoMore

If Sandmann wins his $250 million suit against CNN, all of us can do a "class action" to have CNN shut-down.




top topics



 
133
<< 162  163  164    166  167  168 >>

log in

join