It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The threat of terrorism may be linked -- at least in the public's mind -- to public support for anti-immigration policies. The percentage of residents who say their country's level of immigration is a "serious problem" varies widely, from 86% in Malta, where it outweighs concerns about terrorism, to 18% in Iceland. Residents' tendency to view immigration as a serious problem in their country rises with their likelihood to describe terrorist attacks -- by either residents or non-residents -- the same way, even though some of the recent attacks in Europe have been carried out by native-born residents rather than recent migrants.
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Simply knowing a migrant might go a long way to help counter stereotypes against them and ease migrants' integration in their adopted countries, new Gallup research suggests.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Xtrozero
They kill themselves with the majority of whos weaponry again?
Where do they get all these lovely cluster munitions and assault rifles?
That would be from us or via a proxy source that we sold to.
Your graphs don't show that now do they? LoL
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Xtrozero
AKs are pumped out by the military industrial complex of various nations across the globe.
It's not just AKs and big blades these people are wielding these days.
UK arms sales to the likes of Saudi Arabia rose by two thirds alone in 2017, amounting to an increase of more than £450m in sales.
As to the level of brutality, well i find that hard to comprehend at the best of times.
I'm perfectly aware through of the brutality displayed from both sides of the argument.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Xtrozero
Point is Muslims kill one another with our weaponry.
I thought that was plainly clear and perfectly illustrated by now?
But America is far from weak, America strong, America big boy on the block. LoL
If you wish to talk about killing off males and moving in on there land and livestock.
The indigenous population of your own land did not fair to well in that department after the European colonists got really started and entrenched, neither did the bison/buffalo.
The United States maintains nearly 800 military bases in more than 70 countries and territories around the globe.
Britain, France, and Russia, by contrast, have about 30 foreign bases combined.
How many Muslim military bases of operation do they have on our respective soil?
originally posted by: andy06shake
There are no ""recognized"" areas in any of our respective nations where Sharia law is upheld or enforced, nor in any court of the land.
emphasis added
No-go zones can be defined as Muslim-dominated neighborhoods that are de facto off limits to non-Muslims due to a number of factors, including the lawlessness, insecurity or religious intimidation that often pervades these areas. In some no-go zones, host-country authorities are unable or unwilling to provide even basic public aid, such as police, fire fighting and ambulance services, out of fear of being attacked by Muslim gangs that sometimes claim control over such areas. Muslim enclaves in European cities are also breeding grounds for Islamic radicalism. Europe's no-go zones are the by-product of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged Muslim immigrants to remain segregated from — rather than become integrated into — their European host nations. The problem of no-go zones is well documented, but multiculturalists and their politically correct supporters vehemently deny that they exist. Some are now engaged in a concerted campaign to discredit and even silence those who draw attention to the issue — often by deliberately mischaracterizing the term "no-go zone."