A twist on the ontological argument proving the existence of God

originally posted by: Elcabong
After all, you do want to use this to convert unbelievers, right?

Not personally. Even when I first summarised it to help the OP, I added the opinion that this argument doesn't really prove enough to be useful. Biblical theism, I said, needs something more.

In fact the real weak point of the argument, which nobody seems to be challenging, is the premise "What is real is greater than what is imaginary". That comparison might be a category error.