It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Geological Evidence of Planet‐Wide Groundwater System on Mars

page: 2
33
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 2 2019 @ 12:27 PM
link   
a reply to: ClovenSky

What is "perfect depth?"

The physics of impacts are not really a mystery.
edit on 3/2/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 2 2019 @ 12:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: LookingAtMars

I guess if I shine a light on the outside of an ass, I can tell if there's cancer buried 5-7" inside, because *evidence* lol. It must be a liberal consensus type ideological process. Evidence means proof.go to any, ANY, geological search company and ask for a guaranteed find for underground gold, silver, lithium, etc., you won't get it because it is probabilities, not PROOF.

Silly wabbit, Trix are for kids!

Cheers - Dave



evidence noun
ev·​i·​dence | ˈe-və-dən(t)s , -və-ˌden(t)s
Definition of evidence

(Entry 1 of 2)
1a : an outward sign : indication


Linky


edit on 2-3-2019 by LookingAtMars because: Linky



posted on Mar, 2 2019 @ 12:58 PM
link   
Water is life.

At least as we currently understand.

Next stop OIL.

And Mars becomes a boom town.




posted on Mar, 2 2019 @ 01:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Water is life.

At least as we currently understand.

Next stop OIL.

And Mars becomes a boom town.



Or gold and precious gems. Both may have been found already by MSL (and/or MER) but mum is the word.



posted on Mar, 2 2019 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: LookingAtMars

Them are gonna be some expensive gems.



posted on Mar, 2 2019 @ 01:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: LookingAtMars

originally posted by: neo96
Water is life.

At least as we currently understand.

Next stop OIL.

And Mars becomes a boom town.



Or gold and precious gems. Both may have been found already by MSL (and/or MER) but mum is the word.


Rawr!

Next step Gold pressed latinum!



posted on Mar, 2 2019 @ 01:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LookingAtMars

Them are gonna be some expensive gems.


And there would be demand. Bezos’ mistress showing off a Mars ruby - Priceless



posted on Mar, 2 2019 @ 09:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: LookingAtMars

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: LookingAtMars

I guess if I shine a light on the outside of an ass, I can tell if there's cancer buried 5-7" inside, because *evidence* lol. It must be a liberal consensus type ideological process. Evidence means proof.go to any, ANY, geological search company and ask for a guaranteed find for underground gold, silver, lithium, etc., you won't get it because it is probabilities, not PROOF.

Silly wabbit, Trix are for kids!

Cheers - Dave



evidence noun
ev·​i·​dence | ˈe-və-dən(t)s , -və-ˌden(t)s
Definition of evidence

(Entry 1 of 2)
1a : an outward sign : indication


Linky



Dream on.

Cheers - Dave



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 01:07 AM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle




originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: LookingAtMars

I guess if I shine a light on the outside of an ass, I can tell if there's cancer buried 5-7" inside, because *evidence* lol. It must be a liberal consensus type ideological process. Evidence means proof.go to any, ANY, geological search company and ask for a guaranteed find for underground gold, silver, lithium, etc., you won't get it because it is probabilities, not PROOF.

Silly wabbit, Trix are for kids!

Cheers - Dave


Wrong, evidence does not mean proof.


In the simplest terms, proof is conclusive but evidence isn't. Evidence is more of a suggestion.


is evidence proof


Proof is the final verdict that removes all doubts whereas evidence only leads one in the direction of a fact or statement.





edit on 3-3-2019 by LookingAtMars because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 01:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: ClovenSky
a reply to: lunarcartographer

Could there be a possibility those channels are from electrical scaring?

Give us a credible mechanism by which gigantic electric arcs could occur on an interplanetary scale to create such features, and we'll consider this possibility.

Picture below - fiction.


edit on 3-3-2019 by wildespace because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 01:21 AM
link   
a reply to: wildespace

Here you go.


Oh, wait. You said interplanetary. Never mind. Air and stuff.

I made a Van De Graff generator in 7th grade. Worked pretty good, but not as good as that one.
Best I could get was about 4".
edit on 3/3/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 05:27 AM
link   
I have an idea.

If there really is a sub-surface ground water system, then an easy way to check does exist. Even better, is that this test could be performed with Curiosity. So, we can get some pretty compelling evidence sooner, rather than later, if we want.

All they would need to do, is find an impact crater that had enough force to vaporize some of that groundwater.

Then they check a radius around the crater, for open fissures. Steam would likely rupture from the ground, if a large enough amount of water, was vaporized from the impact.

Seems pretty straight forward. Establish a likely radius around a high energy impact crater, then just drive around that radius, looking for those steam fissures.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 06:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
Good find, you would have thought this would be all over the news???

The news rarely look at scientific hypothesis, no surprises there.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 06:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Archivalist
Even better, is that this test could be performed with Curiosity.

It could not, as there isn't any crater like that inside Gale crater.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 09:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: bobs_uruncle




originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: LookingAtMars

I guess if I shine a light on the outside of an ass, I can tell if there's cancer buried 5-7" inside, because *evidence* lol. It must be a liberal consensus type ideological process. Evidence means proof.go to any, ANY, geological search company and ask for a guaranteed find for underground gold, silver, lithium, etc., you won't get it because it is probabilities, not PROOF.

Silly wabbit, Trix are for kids!

Cheers - Dave


Wrong, evidence does not mean proof.


In the simplest terms, proof is conclusive but evidence isn't. Evidence is more of a suggestion.


is evidence proof


Proof is the final verdict that removes all doubts whereas evidence only leads one in the direction of a fact or statement.



Let me know when you get to the supreme court and change the laws on what is or isn't defined as evidence or proof, mmmkay :-) until then, read up on and use the scientific method. I could say that because aoc is a liberal and an idiot that it is evidence that all liberals are idiots, but in fact, it's just proof aoc is an idiot and there is a probability that all liberals suffer from some form of idiocy.

Cheers - Dave



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: bobs_uruncle




originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: LookingAtMars

I guess if I shine a light on the outside of an ass, I can tell if there's cancer buried 5-7" inside, because *evidence* lol. It must be a liberal consensus type ideological process. Evidence means proof.go to any, ANY, geological search company and ask for a guaranteed find for underground gold, silver, lithium, etc., you won't get it because it is probabilities, not PROOF.

Silly wabbit, Trix are for kids!

Cheers - Dave


Wrong, evidence does not mean proof.


In the simplest terms, proof is conclusive but evidence isn't. Evidence is more of a suggestion.


is evidence proof


Proof is the final verdict that removes all doubts whereas evidence only leads one in the direction of a fact or statement.



Let me know when you get to the supreme court and change the laws on what is or isn't defined as evidence or proof, mmmkay :-) until then, read up on and use the scientific method. I could say that because aoc is a liberal and an idiot that it is evidence that all liberals are idiots, but in fact, it's just proof aoc is an idiot and there is a probability that all liberals suffer from some form of idiocy.

Cheers - Dave


I guess we will have to agree to disagree about your belief that evidence is the same as proof , but why do you think the geologists and researchers at the University of Utrecht didn't use the scientific method when they published the paper Geological Evidence of Planet‐Wide Groundwater System on Mars?


Utrecht University is a university in Utrecht, the Netherlands. It is one of the oldest universities in the Netherlands. Established 26 March 1636, it had an enrollment of 29,425 students in 2016, and employed 5,568 faculty and staff. In 2011, 485 PhD degrees were awarded and 7,773 scientific articles were published.


University of Utrecht



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 04:42 PM
link   
I'm dying to know if there are tardigrades (water bear) in the water. Or any bacteria or life of any form. Can't wait to know.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 04:58 PM
link   
a reply to: StoutBroux

I think the odds are at least 50/50 there is some form of life.

I'm dying to know if there are any complex critters like fish or even better giant seamonkey underwater Martian men



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: LookingAtMars

I'm only waiting for confirmation that there is water.



posted on Mar, 3 2019 @ 06:19 PM
link   
a reply to: ArMaP

I find it more likely than the "Use Curiosity to save Opportunity" mission that is getting petition signatures.

Also, fine, exoMars, 2020, or the friggin MRO itself then.
edit on 3-3-2019 by Archivalist because: Meh



new topics

top topics



 
33
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join