It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
originally posted by: coursecatalog
originally posted by: celltypespecific
You destroy what is left of your credibility when you keep deleting your own posts.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
originally posted by: coursecatalog
originally posted by: celltypespecific
You destroy what is left of your credibility when you keep deleting your own posts.
False statement....actually shows my integrity....
I am one of the few on this thread that's capable of correcting one's error....
“The earlier you admit to your mistakes, the more time you would have to learn and grow from them.”
― Edmond Mbiaka
HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY
originally posted by: celltypespecific
False statement....actually shows my integrity....
HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY
The AAWSAP was not about the ranch! It was about the Nimitz encounters and other Navy/USAF encounters. The ranch became a subordinate issue of interest because Bigelow owned it. There was no AAWSAP tasking for the ranch. - Eric Davis
originally posted by: coursecatalog
originally posted by: Sublant
originally posted by: coursecatalog
a reply to: mirageman
Yes. And when people who should know better keep saying we don't have this level of technology capable of such speed and maneuvers are they being purposely deceptive? Are they parsing their language so they are not technically lying? "We don't have aircraft that are capable of doing these things - but we do have sophisticated technology that can make it appear that we are doing these things."
We don't. And sure as heck didn't have it operational in international waters almost two decades ago.
How do you know? Do you have Cosmic Clearance?
There is no evidence outside of rumor, story, innuendo and dis/misinformation that this is the case and is merely wishful thinking. Starting with something that you believe to be true, which may very well be incorrect - means anything that is built on top of that idea - can potentially be worthless.
originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: celltypespecific
Well here we have two people that certainly look like they believe that flying saucers have "crashed" here on earth...
There is no evidence outside of rumor, story, innuendo and dis/misinformation that this is the case and is merely wishful thinking. Starting with something that you believe to be true, which may very well be incorrect - means anything that is built on top of that idea - can potentially be worthless.
Even if you built a lot of information on top of that - that seemed valuable - which it could be, if the fact that nothing has crashed from outerspace - then all theories and ideas thereafter are mainly useless. I am of the opinion that Ufology is built on a foundations of lies..
Nolans response to this weirdos tweet - is an excuse - its un-falsifiable, which is something we see all the time in ufology.
Even if you built a lot of information on top of that - that seemed valuable - which it could be, if the fact that nothing has crashed from outerspace - then all theories and ideas thereafter are mainly useless. I am of the opinion that Ufology is built on a foundations of lies..
Astronomers took centuries to figure it out. But now, a machine-learning algorithm inspired by the brain has worked out that it should place the Sun at the centre of the Solar System, based on how movements of the Sun and Mars appear from Earth. The feat is one the first tests of a technique that researchers hope they can use to discover new laws of physics, and perhaps to reformulate quantum mechanics, by finding patterns in large data sets. The results are due to appear in Physical Review Letters