It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: coursecatalog
Dr. Green insists that the interview only be released in transcript form and no audio.
originally posted by: pigsy2400
a reply to: 1point92AU
Basing and emotionally investing yourself and your opinions in what someone else has said or does is a dangerous thing and can alter your perception of information that people state.
I base my opinion on TTSA on the information they have presented/provided and it's flawed and very questionable. The content does not add up, the context doesn't either in terms of what they claim their goal to be.
The content does not add up, the context doesn't either in terms of what they claim their goal to be.
also, doesn't know anything at all. If this information is as classified as we are constantly reminded by TDL and members of TTSA , by definition if he did know anything that would mean someone has broken the law by sharing classified information with him. If there was any hint at all, that they were sharing classified information, they would be investigated immediately.
originally posted by: 1point92AU
the anti-TTSA crowd here.
the thread is simply calling out the inconsistencies, flaws and deceptions that TTSA have openly presented since Dec 2017.
On a different note, we have Dr Greens novel to come.....
Yesterday, I mentioned on this website... that I had recently interviewed Dr. Kit Green and would be publishing a full transcript of that interview. I’ve just communicated with Dr. Green about this, and can now say that he and I both misunderstood each other.
First, I will emphasize that there will be at the very least a statement, most likely in article form, possibly jointly written by the two of us, or possibly by me alone. But Dr. Green emphasized that he did not intend for our recent interview to be published in transcript form in any manner.
That isn’t what I had thought. My understanding had been only that he did not want the interview to be replayed in audio format, but that text would be fine. I was wrong about this; Dr. Green considers our recent interview to have been a warm-up, so to speak, in preparation for a more in-depth interview that we will do later this summer.
I do wish I hadn’t made the statement that I did, but did so because I believed he and I were on the same page with all this. Chalk this one up to miscommunication....
One thing that I think is very important, and I don’t think Dr. Green would object to me saying at this time is that he “absolutely” confirms the authenticity of the eleven-page “alien autopsy” email thread that was leaked in June.....
Give it a little time. He and I will be getting together for another interview and I believe the result will be worth the wait.
One thing that I think is very important, and I don’t think Dr. Green would object to me saying at this time is that he “absolutely” confirms the authenticity of the eleven-page “alien autopsy” email thread that was leaked in June. Much of our conversation centered over the information contained within that email. The other fact of note at the present time is that he emphatically does not believe the being in the Santilli film is an alien. He was quite definite on this.
We are required to pay a minimum royalty guarantee of $100,000 each calendar year. Under a Licensing Agreement, we are required to pay royalty payments to Tom DeLonge, Mr. Handsome, LLC, and Good In Bed Music, ASCAP (see “Intellectual Property”, “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, and “Interest of Management and Others in Certain Transactions”). If total royalty payments in any given calendar year are less than $100,000, we have agreed to pay any shortfall such that the annual minimum royalty paid under the Licensing Agreement will be $100,000. This means that we will have to pay this amount even when we have limited revenues, and this could materially reduce our earnings in any year. Failure to pay the minimum royalty guarantee could lead to termination of the Licensing Agreement, and termination of the Licensing Agreement could result in legal and financial harm to the company
That statement along validates you are simply choosing to dismiss the information being presented simply because you don't like the person delivering it. We both agree TDL is douchey and has a likability problem but his shortcomings as a "story teller" do not negate all of the evidence that has been put forward. I will agree that some information that has been "released" by TTSA has some haze around it but the more relevant information in no way has been debunked by any of the anti-TTSA crowd here.
How long does my clearance last when I leave the military?
Clearance becomes inactive once your service ends.
Clearance can be re-activated for up to 24 months as long as your re-evaluation period hasn't passed.
I would be surprised it Tom holds any clearance at all.
But then again if he does I would find that even more interesting.
originally posted by: coursecatalog
So Kit Green basically neutralizes Dolan for the rest of the summer.
This is what happens when you get too close to your sources.