It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Something is breaking in Hanoi

page: 8
32
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 02:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: MadLad

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: MadLad

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MadLad

Yes. That's what I said. Trump wants Kim to give up his nukes.


Kim said he wouldn’t be there if he wasn’t going to talk about denuclearization.


But only if the USA would begin to ease sanctions FIRST.


Yeah, but that wasn’t a part of the deal. The Trump admin has stated this many times. Time to send in the big guns: Dennis Rodman


Or, just let North Korea and South Korea work out their own peace treaty first. Meanwhile, President Trump can stay focused on continuing to make America even greater.




posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 02:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheRedneck

Sounds to me that Kim has acted exactly as Trump's advisors and others have said he would act.

No deal. Mr. Deal Maker. You're not smarter than your Generals. You're not smarter than your advisors.



the fact that you seem to be enjoying this as a win, is what I really wish you would contemplate for a while. no reply necessary, just think on it.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 02:59 AM
link   
All I can say is I’m looking forward to next meeting, and the ones after that. Progress in every small step.

Coulda been worse, hilary could have won.


(That’s a joke, hilary actually had less than zero point zero chance right from the get go)



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: MadLad

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MadLad

The president of the US fuking A dealing directly with a slimy dictator. Yeah, that's great.

Fits right in with the others he deals with and appoints to high positions. His personal lawyer, for example.



I guess he should draw a red line, or maybe throw them billions of dollars.


Now THAT, would be ‘progress’.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:01 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude




the fact that you seem to be enjoying this as a win,

No. The fact is that this was what was expected. The fact is that Trump was played. The fact is that Trump can do nothing, short of invading North Korea, to cause Kim to give up his nukes.

Do you think that invading North Korea is a good plan?


edit on 2/28/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:02 AM
link   
a reply to: MadLad



I guess he should draw a red line, or maybe throw them billions of dollars.

No. Money would not make Kim give up his nukes.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: network dude




the fact that you seem to be enjoying this as a win,

No. The fact is that this was what was expected. The fact is that Trump was played. The fact is that Trump can do nothing, short of invading North Korea, to cause Kim to give up his nukes.

Do you think that invading North Korea is a good plan?



You think so huh? “Trump can do nothing to cause Kim to give up his nukes”??

I think we’ll see denuclearisation within a decade. Thanks to this series of meetings. Thanks to President Trump.

But if I’m wrong. I’ll admit it. What a novel concept.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: network dude




the fact that you seem to be enjoying this as a win,

No. The fact is that this was what was expected. The fact is that Trump was played. The fact is that Trump can do nothing, short of invading North Korea, to cause Kim to give up his nukes.

Do you think that invading North Korea is a good plan?



Now your figments are facts. Look how you’ve moved from summits to invasions.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak




But if I’m wrong. I’ll admit it. What a novel concept.

Yeah. Trump doesn't understand that notion.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:05 AM
link   
a reply to: MadLad




Look how you’ve moved from summits to invasions.

No.

I said that Kim will not give up his nukes willingly.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MadLad



I guess he should draw a red line, or maybe throw them billions of dollars.

No. Money would not make Kim give up his nukes.



Those sanctions are sure getting him close, though.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:06 AM
link   
a reply to: MadLad

The sanctions that have been in effect for decades?

No, not really.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MadLad

The sanctions that have been in effect for decades?

No, not really.


The sanctions Kim wanted lifted? Yeah, those ones.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:07 AM
link   
Kim is at least open to dialogue, in public, with an American President. One who actually bothered to ignore the ‘experts’ and pick up the phone and speak to him.

I believe it’s a step in the right direction and once he starts seeing some positive results coming his way, who knows wht will happen?

Oh that’s right. cNn knows.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:07 AM
link   
a reply to: MadLad

We actually don't know what Kim wanted. Do we?



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Breakthestreak




But if I’m wrong. I’ll admit it. What a novel concept.

Yeah. Trump doesn't understand that notion.


So says the hivemind, irony?
edit on 28 2 2019 by Breakthestreak because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Breakthestreak




Kim is at least open to dialogue, in public, with an American President.

Every Kim has wanted to sit down with an American president. Trump is the first to cave.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MadLad

We actually don't know what Kim wanted. Do we?


That’s what Trump said in the press conference.



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: MadLad

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MadLad

We actually don't know what Kim wanted. Do we?


That’s what Trump said in the press conference.

We actually don't know what Kim wanted. Do we?



posted on Feb, 28 2019 @ 03:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Breakthestreak




Kim is at least open to dialogue, in public, with an American President.

Every Kim has wanted to sit down with an American president. Trump is the first to cave.

Cave?

Yeah ok. Same ol same ol would be much better.

What a future you paint

Trump is first to ‘try’ and it’s paying off. Which is triggering, I know.
edit on 28 2 2019 by Breakthestreak because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
32
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join