It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus
oh for pete's sake!!
committing infanticide is already murder and against the law, any baby, once born, no matter how it comes into the world...
is and infant!! it's illegal to kill it!
healthcare facilities are required to provide lifesaving care to everyone, regardless of weather or not they have insurance, regardless of how they came into the world.
I am not quite sure just what you expect this law to do that isn't covered by other laws!
do you want to force hospitals and parents to put babies that were basically born non-viable, unable to live outside of the wombs without extensive medical intervention with no expectation of any improvement coming in the future? I mean right now, hospitals would be expected to make the baby comfortable, feed them, provide a reasonable amount of care to keep them alive. but, are they required to keep them on life support forever knowing that that life support will never not be needed? should they go ahead with the extensive heart surgery needed to keep the heart pumping the blood knowing that the other problems will probably never be overcome to the point where it cannot survive without machines performing the bodily functions? are you willing to pitch in and share the high cost for the babies?
we allow doctors, with family members consent, to disconnect the life support when there is no hope for anything close to recovery, I know, both my parents left this world that way!! heck, we will shoot the horse that breaks a leg, put down our aged pets and say that it's the humane thing to do, end their suffering.. but, well, some seem to be insisting that we keep babies who would naturally die soon after being disconnected from their machines alive forever, regardless of how much suffering they may be going through, regardless of the cost, both emotional and financial to the parents, to society...
was it really that horrendous that we allowed the doctors to turn off the live support that was keeping my comatose, never to awaken parents semi-alive???
really???
originally posted by: B4DA5H
Why are the republicans so outraged over abortion, but don't seem to mind the mass murder of children from school shootings in this country every couple of weeks? I'm confused
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: riiver
how is it not "strictly true"??
once a baby is born, it becomes an infant... and it's against the law to kill infants, which is kind of repetitious as far as the laws go since that would be considered murder, which, no matter the age... IS ILLEGAL!!
but, the same type of discussion that might be needed regarding a baby that's came into the world as a result of a failed abortion would also occur if a baby that came into the world naturally with a similar condition and prognosis.
are you saying that you think that those baby's that are a result of a failed abortion should have extra protection, additional limitations in order to prolong their existence so another law is needed, a special law, just for that very small class?
the laws are already on the books!!! if for some reason there are doctors out there ignoring those laws, i'm sorry but they will just ignore any new laws.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: carewemust
Keep this one open, the other one is mudpit.
This one can be for the "civil" discussion đ
There's no way to have a civil discussion about murdering innocent little babies.
How any sane person in this country can vote Democrat after this, is beyond my comprehension.
Exactly. Democrats arenât human...theyâre evil.
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 130
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit a health care practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 15, 2019
Mr. Sasse (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Braun, Mr. Burr, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Daines, Ms. Ernst, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Lankford, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Moran, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Portman, Mr. Risch, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Thune, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Young, Mr. Graham, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Enzi) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit a health care practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. Short title.
This Act may be cited as the âBorn-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Actâ.
SEC. 2. Findings.
Congress finds the following:
(1) If an abortion results in the live birth of an infant, the infant is a legal person for all purposes under the laws of the United States, and entitled to all the protections of such laws.
(2) Any infant born alive after an abortion or within a hospital, clinic, or other facility has the same claim to the protection of the law that would arise for any newborn, or for any person who comes to a hospital, clinic, or other facility for screening and treatment or otherwise becomes a patient within its care.
SEC. 3. Born-alive infants protection.
(a) Requirements pertaining to born-Alive abortion survivors.âChapter 74 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1531 the following:
⧠1532. Requirements pertaining to born-alive abortion survivors
â(a) Requirements for health care practitioners.âIn the case of an abortion or attempted abortion that results in a child born alive:
â(1) DEGREE OF CARE REQUIRED; IMMEDIATE ADMISSION TO A HOSPITAL.âAny health care practitioner present at the time the child is born alive shallâ
â(A) exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive at the same gestational age; and
â(B) following the exercise of skill, care, and diligence required under subparagraph (A), ensure that the child born alive is immediately transported and admitted to a hospital.
â(2) MANDATORY REPORTING OF VIOLATIONS.âA health care practitioner or any employee of a hospital, a physicianâs office, or an abortion clinic who has knowledge of a failure to comply with the requirements of paragraph (1) shall immediately report the failure to an appropriate State or Federal law enforcement agency, or to both.
â(b) Penalties.â
â(1) IN GENERAL.âWhoever violates subsection (a) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.
â(2) INTENTIONAL KILLING OF CHILD BORN ALIVE.âWhoever intentionally performs or attempts to perform an overt act that kills a child born alive described under subsection (a), shall be punished as under section 1111 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.
â(c) Bar to prosecution.âThe mother of a child born alive described under subsection (a) may not be prosecuted for a violation of this section, an attempt to violate this section, a conspiracy to violate this section, or an offense under section 3 or 4 of this title based on such a violation.
â(d) Civil remedies.â
â(1) CIVIL ACTION BY A WOMAN ON WHOM AN ABORTION IS PERFORMED.âIf a child is born alive and there is a violation of subsection (a), the woman upon whom the abortion was performed or attempted may, in a civil action against any person who committed the violation, obtain appropriate relief.
â(2) APPROPRIATE RELIEF.âAppropriate relief in a civil action under this subsection includesâ
â(A) objectively verifiable money damage for all injuries, psychological and physical, occasioned by the violation of subsection (a);
â(B) statutory damages equal to 3 times the cost of the abortion or attempted abortion; and
â(C) punitive damages.
â(3) ATTORNEYâS FEE FOR PLAINTIFF.âThe court shall award a reasonable attorneyâs fee to a prevailing plaintiff in a civil action under this subsection.
â(4) ATTORNEYâS FEE FOR DEFENDANT.âIf a defendant in a civil action under this subsection prevails and the court finds that the plaintiffâs suit was frivolous, the court shall award a reasonable attorneyâs fee in favor of the defendant against the plaintiff.
â(e) Definitions.âIn this section the following definitions apply:
â(1) ABORTION.âThe term âabortionâ means the use or prescription of any instrument, medicine, drug, or any other substance or deviceâ
â(A) to intentionally kill the unborn child of a woman known to be pregnant; or
â(B) to intentionally terminate the pregnancy of a woman known to be pregnant, with an intention other thanâ
â(i) after viability, to produce a live birth and preserve the life and health of the child born alive; or
â(ii) to remove a dead unborn child.
â(2) ATTEMPT.âThe term âattemptâ, with respect to an abortion, means conduct that, under the circumstances as the actor believes them to be, constitutes a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in performing an abortion.
â(3) BORN ALIVE.âThe term âborn aliveâ has the meaning given that term in section 8 of title 1, United States Code (commonly known as the âBorn-Alive Infants Protection Actâ).â.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: IAMTAT
I'm gonna just say it.
The Democrat Party is now the Party that wants to kill newborn babies.
Right now, most aborted babies have/had DEMOCRAT mothers. Democrats should want them to be born, grow up, and vote Democrat.
But I guess figuring that out involves thinking rationally. Democrats have lost that capability...probably long ago, when they thought Hillary Clinton would be a good President.
I just don't know how anyone can vote with a party that actually supports murdering newborn babies.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
We are already there, already at the point of euthanizing less than perfect or unwanted children after birth. Think about that for a moment.