It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neo96
A quadcopter is cheaper than a stinger.
But where is the line Republicans drawn in the sand where gun control should exist. Should bazookas, 50 caliber machines guns, and stinger missiles be legal or not? Should the private citizen be able to own a fully functional WWII tank?
originally posted by: Ahabstar
I remember a Democrat that wouldn’t let people own gold. Made people sell it to the Federal government and then jacked the price to $35 an ounce, making it worth more than what the government paid the people for it.
And by strange coincidence, that same Democrat made it illegal to own a machine gun without a $200 tax stamp just a few years beforehand.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: ColeYounger
I think the more interesting commentary is not where Democrats say stupid stuff about gun control. But where is the line Republicans drawn in the sand where gun control should exist. Should bazookas, 50 caliber machines guns, and stinger missiles be legal or not? Should the private citizen be able to own a fully functional WWII tank?
Take the stinger missile for example. Imagine what would happen is somewhere were able to sell stinger missiles on the side of the road along near an airport. Hmmmm, what could possibly happen? Guys could sit on corners like handing out flowers or spray cleaning wind shields. "Hey mister, is your ex-wife getting on a flight? I have a big package of love for only 5 bills".
So my question is to all you stand-up mightier-than-thou Republicans with real backbones where do you stand? If you are for government you can drown in a bathtub then show your true colors on gun control and say, "no restrictions".