It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Federal judge says Roger Stone could be jailed after Instagram post

page: 3
19
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: gallop

originally posted by: okrian
Maybe when Trump said "drain the swamp" he meant 'Just get me into office and then I will tear my swampy self down and I'll take my corporatist money-worshipping friends with me'.


Oh yeah, that's exactly what he meant... don't bother actually reading the thread, and carry on back to CNN.

Cheers.


Gotta love the righties on here with the regurgitated narratives. CNN are just corporatists as well. But keep up with the unoriginal insults.

I'm sure that Stone, the other lobbyists, Trump, and all his money-driven swamp need you to defend them. Don't question the corporatists. They can act however they want cause money. Hopefully not this time, but I'm not holding my breath.




posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

Judges have entirely too much power in this country. They need to be brought to heel swiftly and with great contempt.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:33 PM
link   
I'm not surprised it's being labeled as a threat because it makes a much better headline, but I don't think many will get too far in arguing that it actually is.

That said, Stone shouldn't have said a word about his case. He's obviously implying he's not going to have a fair trial, which can sway the jury in one way or the other into thinking "Maybe they ARE just out to get this guy?" or worse yet, "Yeah, that's right, you're going down and I'm going to help!".

Why even bother posting it in the first place? "Don't talk about the case" means "Don't talk about the case", that's pretty easy to understand. Instead, the guy's letting his ego call the shots and running his mouth when he should really just be letting his lawyers handle everything. The guy already f*cked up and got caught lying, now he's just adding fuel to the fire. They're going to use whatever they can to put him away, even if it's complete BS, and the guy just handed them a few more inches of rope to do so.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: gallop

Oh look folks..... another fifth avenue resident...
You know.... where he could shoot someone in the middle of and no one would do a thing.

But if it was a picture of trump with the cross hairs of a rifle I bet you would be so outraged you'd be drooling.


Strange thing hey, I wasn't up in arms about Trump having cross hairs on his head, much like I wasn't when kathy griffin held his severed head aloft. Nor was I the last time that lame show pulled the piss. Nor was I about the baby Trump blimp. Nor was I almost every other time you lot bragged about having something so genius, impeachment was imminent.. No, I just looked at the facts ma'am.. and posted those when I could. I didn't, for a while, let you lot mean sfa to me..

But you are just ridiculous now, and ridicule is all you deserve. Which I do try to temper, at least here..

Wow, did I just blow your mind? Or was it you just being you?

No.. Not everyone follows your narrative, darling.. wouldn't want that stuff on my shoes..

Try again? Care to refute any facts? Or just more of your same bull#?



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Lumenari

right because that would only be a problem if the image was of trump.

And it was meant to symbolize cross hairs not the sun... otherwise he wouldnt have put it up in the first place.
Get real....


Trump should open up a new Trump Tower in your head since he apparently already owns the place.

You decided to ignore the other picture with a different person? What a surprise.


Check the link out, there are more.. it's their thing.

One retarded page I read linked it to a russian website, and on looking they had sourced it from there.

Just goes to show just how silly these idiots are.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell
I don’t wish jail on anybody unless it’s a violent crime, but the point here is Stone did a stupid thing that hurt his own case.

As for your point, justice is elusive and that case has to be weighed on its own merits


What, in your honest opinion, did he do?

In your baby words, so I can understand...



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: gallop

All you will ever get is BS there I am afraid, but with the Mueller report set to land and it looking like 2 years of her hopes and dreams being dashed it's going to be funny to watch the wriggling.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: Willtell

No-one was threatened. Your thread was debunked on page 1. Fake outrage period.


Fake Thread forum.

Or as we know it, HOAX.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: okrian

originally posted by: gallop

originally posted by: okrian
Maybe when Trump said "drain the swamp" he meant 'Just get me into office and then I will tear my swampy self down and I'll take my corporatist money-worshipping friends with me'.


Oh yeah, that's exactly what he meant... don't bother actually reading the thread, and carry on back to CNN.

Cheers.


Gotta love the righties on here with the regurgitated narratives. CNN are just corporatists as well. But keep up with the unoriginal insults.

I'm sure that Stone, the other lobbyists, Trump, and all his money-driven swamp need you to defend them. Don't question the corporatists. They can act however they want cause money. Hopefully not this time, but I'm not holding my breath.


Gonna hit me with ur bike lock bruh?

Don't hit me bro, don't hit me bro..

It is clear that you, singular use btw, do not engage your mental faculties enough in order to adjust what you read, to what is truth.

So, carry on, go back to whatever socialist medium of your liking, you prefer. No leading a horse to water to make it drink here, it will nay nay and decant from logic at the first sign of it. And to think, you almost had me at corporatists..

Let your words be your judgement, even if they are wrongly taken out of context. That's what you're saying. And when the truth is revealed, let your affiliations be your judgement. Then your friends. then... then... then... You leftists are pathetic.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Drucifer
Why even bother posting it in the first place? "Don't talk about the case" means "Don't talk about the case"


He wasn't gagged about talking about the case, unless it was near the court. His online obligation, with online posting, was in no way hindered with what he said.

But I do agree, he did make a mistake. But......

Perhaps on purpose, to prove a point, maybe.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 03:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Drucifer
I'm not surprised it's being labeled as a threat because it makes a much better headline, but I don't think many will get too far in arguing that it actually is.

That said, Stone shouldn't have said a word about his case. He's obviously implying he's not going to have a fair trial, which can sway the jury in one way or the other into thinking "Maybe they ARE just out to get this guy?" or worse yet, "Yeah, that's right, you're going down and I'm going to help!".

Why even bother posting it in the first place? "Don't talk about the case" means "Don't talk about the case", that's pretty easy to understand. Instead, the guy's letting his ego call the shots and running his mouth when he should really just be letting his lawyers handle everything. The guy already f*cked up and got caught lying, now he's just adding fuel to the fire. They're going to use whatever they can to put him away, even if it's complete BS, and the guy just handed them a few more inches of rope to do so.


You are so uninformed it's scary. You just read a headline didn;t you and that was that - Stone was gagged in your mind. Really sad.
Stone was not gagged. The order to not talk about the case was on the steps of the court house and in court and also a gag put on witnesses and attorney's. But Stone left the hearing free to talk about the case except around the court house. Try and get informed before wading in, FFS.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: gallop

All you will ever get is BS there I am afraid, but with the Mueller report set to land and it looking like 2 years of her hopes and dreams being dashed it's going to be funny to watch the wriggling.


It is one of those impossible puzzles, really.. you can't work it out, get frustrated, put it down for an hour, but always come back trying.

But the puzzle just refuses to see a solution.. they just won't see facts. the puzzle just keep changing the goal posts of what it expects, and get more and more ludicrous each time..

It would be fun to tackle, if they were not real people, with real votes and real consequences...



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join