It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by quango
Yeah - I mean, I'm not against this, but I don't see how helpful it will really be. Like someone said, how many prison inmates are concerned about grabbing a condom beforehand.Still - saving money and slowing AIDS are good things. It's just a strange message. Like a parent to a kid - "Don't go in the cookie jar. There are napkins on the table." Or some similiar analogy.
Originally posted by FredT
I actually made mention of this. And the economic incentives are huge. Even if one HIV case is prevented, the savings to the taxpayers in California would be huge. Its not like we are breaking ground here. As the intial article said several states already do this as do most of the nations in Europe.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
This is utterly stupid. It's illegal to have sex, but here's your monthly supply of rubbers.
Originally posted by mwm1331
Furthermore if this does happen and an inmate is raped by an nmate using one of these condoms couldn't the government be sued for it. I mean it seems to me that if ths initative passes then the government would be "providing material assistance to someone performing an llegal acton." Lets face it if even one imate commits a rape with a condom on, and even hints that he would not have done so before due to his fear of contracting the ads virus, then there would be legal ground for charging the government of california with being an accessory wouldn't there?
Originally posted by mwm1331
So then lady V, do you think we should give condoms to suspected rapists who are outside of prison as well? I mean afterall since they are going to rape a woman anyway might as well make sure they practice "safer raping" right?
Originally posted by Kriz_4
Well it means that the 30% can have safe sex. Again rape obviously does happen and is obviously not being stopped.
I doubt a rapist would choose to use a condom so maybe that is a moot point. However if the rape is going to happen and the rapist uses a condom, is the VICTIM not going to be safer?
I fail to see how you equate it to supporting rape or to make rapists safer.