It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pelosi warns GOP - Next president could declare national emergency on GUNS

page: 4
33
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 03:39 AM
link   
a reply to: XAnarchistX

You "anarchists" and your love of the Dems. :rolleyes: so freaking cute it is.

The scenario your queen, Pelosi laid out is 180-degrees off of what Trump is doing. He's using an Emergency Order to enforce STANDING LAW... your heroine Pelosi, mother of all things imitative of fetal alcohol syndrome, is suggesting a Democrat POTUS could cite this as his or her chance to effectively legislate (that word means "create a new law") straight from the executive branch, which is something referred to as "Unconstitutional." I realize the Dems rebel wing of anarchists, ANTIFAPPERS, and Juggalos are an important subgenre of the Left, but do they really need to be so woefully uninformed in the actual way government operates and in the differences between legitimate Constitutional authority and Botox brain addled elderly delusions from their high priestess?




posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 03:44 AM
link   
Lulz

That'll be the last president.

Do it.

Just don't cry foul when citizens defend their rights.

And you have to pry them from cold dead hands from millions of Americans in short GFYS Nancy you loopy old hag.



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 03:45 AM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Oh yeah larplord is cringey af.



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 03:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: XAnarchistX

You "anarchists" and your love of the Dems. :rolleyes: so freaking cute it is.

The scenario your queen, Pelosi laid out is 180-degrees off of what Trump is doing. He's using an Emergency Order to enforce STANDING LAW... your heroine Pelosi, mother of all things imitative of fetal alcohol syndrome, is suggesting a Democrat POTUS could cite this as his or her chance to effectively legislate (that word means "create a new law") straight from the executive branch, which is something referred to as "Unconstitutional." I realize the Dems rebel wing of anarchists, ANTIFAPPERS, and Juggalos are an important subgenre of the Left, but do they really need to be so woefully uninformed in the actual way government operates and in the differences between legitimate Constitutional authority and Botox brain addled elderly delusions from their high priestess?


An emergency order from the dems to subvert the 2nd amendment, is a declaration of civil war.

An emergency order by Trump to protect our border subverts nothing, but protects national law.

Why do people side with these stupid democrats.

edit on 2/15/2019 by EternalSolace because: Spelling



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 06:28 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen
I have an idea that circumvents their gun grab in any form. First the requirement would be states to institute a system for gun owners to apply as a neighborhood militia member. These would be local neighborhood protection forces that would require a once or twice a year meeting for tactical and training purposes. See ex Justice Stephens gun grabbing argument was that the second amendment was for a well regulated militia. Well this satisfies even the most exacting gun grabbing tactic. What say you?



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 06:29 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

edit on 15-2-2019 by Ansuzrune because: double post



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 06:39 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

This..... was her reaction to the totally ridiculous idea that there is a crisis at the southern border when there clearly is NOT!
If the moron can declare a national emergency when there is none then the nation should be prepared for other presidents to just declare the same imperial power and outlaw guns.
Of course you missed that this was completely tongue in cheek but that doesn't surprise me one bit. Reality doesn't fit your game plan so just ignore it.

edit on 2152019 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 06:42 AM
link   
a reply to: ausername

There is no crisis at the border and no one with a lick of sense is saying that.
No media except maybe Fox and Breitbart are claiming any crisis at the border.
The media is laughing in trumps face again. The loser is not getting his pathetic little wall. Aint never gonna happen.



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 07:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: xuenchen

Just say no.


that is epic
well done



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 07:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: acackohfcc
there's nothing about walls in the constitution.
there might not be much they can do even after declaring an emergency on guns

I see readily that you have never even read the Preamble of The Constitution
So , why do you comment on the Constitution ?

Denying Ignorance
Why ?
This time it hit home



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme




There is no crisis at the border and no one with a lick of sense is saying that.




U.S. officials apprehended more than 200,000 people trying to cross the U.S.-Mexico border illegally in the past four months, about an 85 percent increase from the same time last year, according to data released Friday by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.


abcnews.go.com...

People with sense are saying it.

People that don't have a lick of sense are saying it isn't.



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:14 AM
link   
While guns is not a legitimate "national emergency" example, if Trump gets his way, it will absolutely open the door to anything that isn't a national emergency, that a POTUS wants to say is, to bypass that whole pesky political balances and checks thing our forefathers put into place to protect the country against bullcrap like this.

The wall is in no way a national emergency. Hopefully cooler (and smarter) heads will prevail, and they will legally shoot down the laughable "emergency" claim to build a wall.



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:19 AM
link   
Who would enforce the local laws of a national emergency on guns, the national guard, local police, the FBI, the very people who personally own guns themselves. I highly doubt that, in all red states this could ever be enforced, the people tasked to do it would just refuse, and call for the removal of the administration that proclaimed it, as a domestic enemy of the Constitution that they swore to uphold and protect when they took their particular office.
And if the federal government threaten them with termination and jail time if they didn't comply, then you would have your civil war 2, but it would be short because the military would just end it for the gun side, if the military split evenly along state parties you would be looking at the end of America. But everybody could just hit the pause bottom and let the supreme court decide, that's why this next judge pick is even more important that most realize, it's an absolute insurance policy on political stupidity from the DNC should they win.

Nancy be careful with your bluster, the wall is not worth hyperbolic language that could lead to anarchy within America just so you can win on a political point.

One final thought, the next National Emergency declared by a Democrat might not be on guns at all but something completely different, something equally shocking but never foreseen and in connection the world and the UN.
Trump is setting the path for something biblical that the next President can do.....and it might have been why he has been the Teflon Don so far with nothing touching him, despite the massive unprecedented attempts to take him out ever since that first Fox debate with Megan.
edit on 15-2-2019 by Blue_Jay33 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:36 AM
link   
Pelosi is just stating that if Hillary won she would have declared an National Emergency to confiscate your guns. How they execute that would be difficult. Like Eric Swalwell: they have nukes.



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: xuenchen

yeah because worshipping a piece of meaningless paper is "rights"


ROFLOL the perfect answer 🤣



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

This..... was her reaction to the totally ridiculous idea that there is a crisis at the southern border when there clearly is NOT!
If the moron can declare a national emergency when there is none then the nation should be prepared for other presidents to just declare the same imperial power and outlaw guns.
Of course you missed that this was completely tongue in cheek but that doesn't surprise me one bit. Reality doesn't fit your game plan so just ignore it.


LOL watch CNN at 10am EST Feb 15th and see what happens 🤣



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:47 AM
link   
a reply to: EternalSolace




Why do people side with these stupid democrats.


Because they want to live under a police state.



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 09:42 AM
link   
Well we knew their agenda was to take away the guns from civilians while supplying guns to our enemies and the cartels. Pretty simple.



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 10:16 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Openly let the cat out of the bag; additionally vague map broadcasting concerning directional intent.

The comparisons will be all over the charts with a declaration of emergency by Trump. Coupled with media misdirection....

Going to be a fun-fest to see unfold.


Mg



posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 12:51 PM
link   
No thanks I don't really feel like turning into the Weimar Republic.

I rather hope that all these unconstitutional laws against 'assault weapons' are repealed and that the 2nd is upheld like it was just fine 20 years ago.

a reply to: Ahabstar







 
33
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join