It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That’s completely fair. Thank you for the reasonable response. I cannot disagree with it.
All activists are essentially self-promoters, and Robinson is no different.
Personally I don’t think he should have been jailed for what he did. That seems to me an abuse of power.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MadLad
I hate the bastards as well.
But without those ""silly"" as you put it, judges and courts of law, everything would fall apart in about 2 seconds flat.
And that's just how society functions.
Yet the blame for what “could have” happened is placed solely on Robinson’s head, while the very laws and judge who would open these animal’s cages is given a pass. It’s clear that it isn’t about the what might actually let these abusers free, but about condemning Robinson.
I know, right?
All those pedos that didn’t actually do anything apart from plan out kidmappings or have plans to start grooming young kids. I mean, they didn’t do anything and it was all “they could haves”.
Let’s just set them free too?
“Kidmappings”?
I’m on my phone and have fat thumbs.
I see you didn’t address what I said though. Nice to see you’re all for setting pedos free.
Because what you said is “nonesense”.
How is it nonesense? They hadn’t done anything, yet. Just like your sick hero “Tommy”.
Maybe you should read up on English law before you embarrass yourself further.
You should read the case before saying these child abusers didn’t do anything. Pretty sick.
I see you have reading comprehension issues. I was referring to ones who had only planned to and got put in prison for it, even though they technically hadn’t done anything. The SAME thing you’re defending “Tommy” on.
Try reading next time.
You said they hadn’t done anything. You’re wrong.
Now twisting what I’ve said.
Obvious troll is obvious.
I’m leaving this thread. Waste of time and effort conversing with trolls who support “Tommy”.
I’ll quote you:
“How is it nonesense? They hadn’t done anything, yet.”
Taken completely out of context and pretending he was talking about the child molesters.
I would give you the benefit of the doubt that it was an honest mistake on your part but you have already shown yourself to be a liar.
Oh, who was the “they” he was speaking about?
Go back and read the post you quoted. It's certainly not difficult to follow.
Then if you have any decency come back and apologise to Terry.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
True dat, but its that or let the weans spank me at COD again. LoL
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
True dat, but its that or let the weans spank me at COD again. LoL
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MadLad
I hate the bastards as well.
But without those ""silly"" as you put it, judges and courts of law, everything would fall apart in about 2 seconds flat.
And that's just how society functions.
Yet the blame for what “could have” happened is placed solely on Robinson’s head, while the very laws and judge who would open these animal’s cages is given a pass. It’s clear that it isn’t about the what might actually let these abusers free, but about condemning Robinson.
I know, right?
All those pedos that didn’t actually do anything apart from plan out kidmappings or have plans to start grooming young kids. I mean, they didn’t do anything and it was all “they could haves”.
Let’s just set them free too?
“Kidmappings”?
I’m on my phone and have fat thumbs.
I see you didn’t address what I said though. Nice to see you’re all for setting pedos free.
Because what you said is “nonesense”.
How is it nonesense? They hadn’t done anything, yet. Just like your sick hero “Tommy”.
Maybe you should read up on English law before you embarrass yourself further.
You should read the case before saying these child abusers didn’t do anything. Pretty sick.
I see you have reading comprehension issues. I was referring to ones who had only planned to and got put in prison for it, even though they technically hadn’t done anything. The SAME thing you’re defending “Tommy” on.
Try reading next time.
You said they hadn’t done anything. You’re wrong.
Now twisting what I’ve said.
Obvious troll is obvious.
I’m leaving this thread. Waste of time and effort conversing with trolls who support “Tommy”.
I’ll quote you:
“How is it nonesense? They hadn’t done anything, yet.”
Taken completely out of context and pretending he was talking about the child molesters.
I would give you the benefit of the doubt that it was an honest mistake on your part but you have already shown yourself to be a liar.
Oh, who was the “they” he was speaking about?
Go back and read the post you quoted. It's certainly not difficult to follow.
Then if you have any decency come back and apologise to Terry.
If you have the stones, tell me who the “they” in this statement was?
“How is it nonesense? They hadn’t done anything, yet. Just like your sick hero “Tommy”.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MadLad
I hate the bastards as well.
But without those ""silly"" as you put it, judges and courts of law, everything would fall apart in about 2 seconds flat.
And that's just how society functions.
Yet the blame for what “could have” happened is placed solely on Robinson’s head, while the very laws and judge who would open these animal’s cages is given a pass. It’s clear that it isn’t about the what might actually let these abusers free, but about condemning Robinson.
I know, right?
All those pedos that didn’t actually do anything apart from plan out kidmappings or have plans to start grooming young kids. I mean, they didn’t do anything and it was all “they could haves”.
Let’s just set them free too?
“Kidmappings”?
I’m on my phone and have fat thumbs.
I see you didn’t address what I said though. Nice to see you’re all for setting pedos free.
Because what you said is “nonesense”.
How is it nonesense? They hadn’t done anything, yet. Just like your sick hero “Tommy”.
Maybe you should read up on English law before you embarrass yourself further.
You should read the case before saying these child abusers didn’t do anything. Pretty sick.
I see you have reading comprehension issues. I was referring to ones who had only planned to and got put in prison for it, even though they technically hadn’t done anything. The SAME thing you’re defending “Tommy” on.
Try reading next time.
You said they hadn’t done anything. You’re wrong.
Now twisting what I’ve said.
Obvious troll is obvious.
I’m leaving this thread. Waste of time and effort conversing with trolls who support “Tommy”.
I’ll quote you:
“How is it nonesense? They hadn’t done anything, yet.”
Taken completely out of context and pretending he was talking about the child molesters.
I would give you the benefit of the doubt that it was an honest mistake on your part but you have already shown yourself to be a liar.
Oh, who was the “they” he was speaking about?
Go back and read the post you quoted. It's certainly not difficult to follow.
Then if you have any decency come back and apologise to Terry.
If you have the stones, tell me who the “they” in this statement was?
“How is it nonesense? They hadn’t done anything, yet. Just like your sick hero “Tommy”.
He was making a point about how incredibly stupid your argument was. Trying to claim he was saying the child molesters in this case hadn't done anything is a lie.
Your point was weak enough to begin with, your continued claims that people on here defending child molesters only devalues what little point you may have had.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: MadLad
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
I would never listen to or take advise from you. Sorry, but your wall of moral puffery was a waste of time.
You little coward!
Honestly, you are.
You know what I have written about your pathetic posting on this thread is true and you're just not a big enough person to admit that you've got this one wrong and back down.
There is no point in conversing with you further and I would encourage all other members on this thread to stop responding to your posts.
I would say its nice to see you back les but its not...meh probably won't take the mods long to ban you again if this is going to be how your going to be posting on this account.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MadLad
I've heard my weans called a few choice words before.
Pray-tell though, what the bejesus is/are "moral superiors"?
Are they like Mother Superiors only less Catholic?
Weans always boss me around mate, that is until they dont.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: MadLad
originally posted by: MadLad
Yet the blame for what “could have” happened is placed solely on Robinson’s head, while the very laws and judge who would open these animal’s cages is given a pass. It’s clear that it isn’t about the what might actually let these abusers free, but about condemning Robinson.
I know, right?
All those pedos that didn’t actually do anything apart from plan out kidmappings or have plans to start grooming young kids. I mean, they didn’t do anything and it was all “they could haves”.
The actual context of the post. Are you a liar or just really really stupid?
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: MadLad
originally posted by: MadLad
Yet the blame for what “could have” happened is placed solely on Robinson’s head, while the very laws and judge who would open these animal’s cages is given a pass. It’s clear that it isn’t about the what might actually let these abusers free, but about condemning Robinson.
I know, right?
All those pedos that didn’t actually do anything apart from plan out kidmappings or have plans to start grooming young kids. I mean, they didn’t do anything and it was all “they could haves”.
The actual context of the post. Are you a liar or just really really stupid?
Just digging your own lying hole and laying in it. He is literally and figurately saying they didn’t abuse children and it was all “could haves”.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: MadLad
originally posted by: MadLad
Yet the blame for what “could have” happened is placed solely on Robinson’s head, while the very laws and judge who would open these animal’s cages is given a pass. It’s clear that it isn’t about the what might actually let these abusers free, but about condemning Robinson.
I know, right?
All those pedos that didn’t actually do anything apart from plan out kidmappings or have plans to start grooming young kids. I mean, they didn’t do anything and it was all “they could haves”.
The actual context of the post. Are you a liar or just really really stupid?
Just digging your own lying hole and laying in it. He is literally and figurately saying they didn’t abuse children and it was all “could haves”.
That's really what you take from that post?
Maybe I really was giving you too much credit thinking you were a liar...
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: MadLad
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
I would never listen to or take advise from you. Sorry, but your wall of moral puffery was a waste of time.
You little coward!
Honestly, you are.
You know what I have written about your pathetic posting on this thread is true and you're just not a big enough person to admit that you've got this one wrong and back down.
There is no point in conversing with you further and I would encourage all other members on this thread to stop responding to your posts.
I would say its nice to see you back les but its not...meh probably won't take the mods long to ban you again if this is going to be how your going to be posting on this account.
Strangely enough the only time I remember anyone defending child abuse on this site was a certain free speech advocate who defended online grooming on free speech grounds.
I don’t support Robinson, just his human rights.