It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Tommy Robinson...vile little thug.

page: 13
4
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 04:41 AM
link   
a reply to: MadLad



Attempts to jeopardize their trials? No, he attempted to film them, without understanding the full consequence.


As incorrect as anything could possibly be.
The consequences had been fully explained to him.


In 2017, Robinson received a suspended sentence for putting a trial at Canterbury Crown Court at risk of collapse, by broadcasting prejudicial statements about defendants from inside the court building. In 2018, he was imprisoned for a similar offence at Leeds Crown Court. However, he was later released following a successful challenge to the court's sentencing procedure.




In May 2017, Robinson was convicted of contempt of court for putting a gang-rape trial in danger of collapsing. He filmed inside Canterbury Crown Court and posted prejudicial statements calling the defendants "Muslim child rapists" while the jury was deliberating. He received a three-month sentence, suspended for 18 months.



Robinson was jailed and later released in the summer of 2018 for almost collapsing the Huddersfield grooming gang trial.[89][93]

On 25 May 2018, Robinson was arrested for a breach of the peace while live streaming outside Leeds Crown Court[91][94] during the trial of the Huddersfield grooming gang on which reporting restrictions had been ordered by the judge


en.wikipedia.org...(activist)

How many warning does Yaxley-Lennon need?

If you bother to read the article linked to - yes, its Wikipedia but the article is well referenced and all references can be checked, if you can be bothered - it gives a clear account of the legal issues surrounding his repeated offences.



The only thing that would have jeopardized their trial and set them loose are the government and the silly laws,....


How did the government directly affect anything to do with Yaxley-Lennon?

They may be 'silly laws'....but they are the law regardless and knowingly jeopardising these trials in order to publicise oneself is totally unforgivable.
Fair enough, campaign to change the 'silly laws' but to deliberately put the trials of these monsters at risk is indefensible.



....the same government and silly laws that let them continue their campaign of rape and abuse for as long as it had.


Due to the intrusion of political correctness into most aspects of society - and not only here in the UK - many people buried their collective heads in the sand over this issue. There was, and still is in some quarters, a refusal to accept that we have a specific problem with grooming within a specific section of our society.
But there is a growing recognition of the problem and more and more gangs are being successfully prosecuted.
In addition more prominent people, including senior politicians are in fact publicly acknowledging this problem.



It's relevant to Tommy Robinson because you guys point to his troubled past, his time in jail, to explain your hatred.


I don't hate Stephen....I just think he's complete knobhead and not a suitable spokesperson for the most disenfranchised section of society.
The relevant points he makes are drowned in an ocean of absolute bollocks, bull#, grandstanding and self-promotion.

Why do you refuse to see that Yaxley-Lennon's grandstanding and self-promoting tactics knowingly jeopardised the trials of paedophile scumbags....not just once but on several occasions?




posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 09:43 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Screw Palestine and their state-sponsored terrorist dogs.

Israel is winning (without any real contest) for a reason.

The superior force will do that...

And Robinson? Great to see this patriotic young gent standing up against the dirt-party socialist garbage and their Muslim terrorist friends.

Get 'em Robinson. Don't listen to these soft-as-mud whiners



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 09:48 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns




dirt-party socialist garbage


Do you mean our right wing Tory Government?

I see that you are as usual keeping up with current events over here.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

"patriotic young gent"

My god mate have you seen the fellow in question???

Actually, listened to the racist drivel that comes out his puss?

The guy is an A1 bawbag if ever there was one.

If that's patriotism this nation has indeed gone to the dogs in spades.

edit on 18-2-2019 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 10:02 AM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

What is your problem with Robinson again?

He exposes the crimes of Muslim refugees against the British people? He refuses to kowtow to any government? He won't bow down before the lefties and dump all over Israel (vs. the parasitic pseudo-state that keeps sending Iranian trained/supplied terrorists on missions of mass murder)?

Or because he actually speaks his mind without regard to PC nonsense?

People will say things that offend you and others. I would promptly get over it. The UK's constant whining about this identity politic BS is making them look quite soft and weak........... not a good look!

Sure, what he said about the cabbies and others "wasn't nice." Who cares! It is his RIGHT as a human being to hold his own beliefs, no matter how stupid or outlandish some of those beliefs are. Those who try to suppress those beliefs are merely giving them a platform and an enemy. And as we all well know, nothing unites people faster than having an enemy.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 10:05 AM
link   
a reply to: oldcarpy

RW


If that were true, your government would not have allowed your nation of 63 million to be invaded by millions of non-British un-assimilated "refugees" who clearly have a bone to pick with the West.

Where was your RW government when the actual/real Citizens of the UK were concerned about the Islamization of Britain? Or the displacement of the British culture and heritage with foreigners
edit on 2/18/2019 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 10:06 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns





He exposes the crimes of Muslim refugees against the British people?


No, he didn't.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Less than 5% of the population of the U.K. are Muslim....so what the hell are you taking about?



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

I think our definitions of "right wing" may be a little different.....



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 10:14 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Sorry mate, the 'dirt-party socialist garbage' who supported terrorists were elements within The Labour Party who supported your beloved socialist terrorist murdering scumbag IRA.

As someone so vocally opposed to illegal immigrants into the USA I'm surprised, well not really, to see you supporting someone who tried to illegally gain entry into the USA.
Someone with both drug and fraud convictions.
Someone who assaulted a police officer.

Good to see you being so consistent in your inconsistency.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 10:25 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns




Where was your RW government when the actual/real Citizens of the UK were concerned about the Islamization of Britain? Or the displacement of the British culture and heritage with foreigners


The UK has been founded upon immigration for centuries. British culture? What - like going for an Indian or a Chinese takeaway?

I think the US has had a fair bit of immigration since it was colonised, too.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

"What is your problem with Robinson again?"

He does not speak his mind he presents other peoples skewered racist drivel and opinion as his own for a very specific purpose.

He's not even original. LoL

He's a nonsensical racist twat with his own agenda to satisfy, and axe to grind.

That irks me somewhat.

Theses my dilemma right there.

edit on 18-2-2019 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 11:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Freeborn

I still don’t get why you guys defend the child abusers but ridicule the one trying to expose them. You blame the guy filming, but not the silly laws that free a child abuser because he got caught on camera.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: MadLad

Where do we defend "child abusers"?

We hint all Muslims are not "child abusers" just as all British people are not Tommy Robinson.
LoL



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MadLad

Where do we defend "child abusers"?

We hint all Muslims are not "child abusers" just as all British people are not Tommy Robinson.
LoL



You guys keep denouncing Robinson for trying to film child abusers.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 11:40 AM
link   
a reply to: MadLad

We keep denouncing Robinson because he is a complete and utter botten, muppet racist, rinse and repeat nonsensical idiot.

There is a margin of a difference im afraid.

As to the beasts let them burn, the world spins, im sure they will get there comeuppance in the post.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 11:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: MadLad

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MadLad

Where do we defend "child abusers"?

We hint all Muslims are not "child abusers" just as all British people are not Tommy Robinson.
LoL



You guys keep denouncing Robinson for trying to film child abusers.


The UK has very strict rules on trial process and integrity. There is a perfectly valid argument that some of those rules are overly strict but that does not change the fact that those rules exist.

Robinson was very well aware those rules and the potential consequences yet persisted with his actions knowing that it could have resulted in a mistrial.

The closest anyone is getting to defending child abusers are those defending Robinson's reckless and self serving behaviour.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 11:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: MadLad

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MadLad

Where do we defend "child abusers"?

We hint all Muslims are not "child abusers" just as all British people are not Tommy Robinson.
LoL



You guys keep denouncing Robinson for trying to film child abusers.


The UK has very strict rules on trial process and integrity. There is a perfectly valid argument that some of those rules are overly strict but that does not change the fact that those rules exist.

Robinson was very well aware those rules and the potential consequences yet persisted with his actions knowing that it could have resulted in a mistrial.

The closest anyone is getting to defending child abusers are those defending Robinson's reckless and self serving behaviour.



This is all you guys have are the theoretical mistrials that never happened.



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: MadLad

Can i have that "theoretical mistrials" palaver?

Might somehow work it towards some real Minstrels, i love that chocolate.


Anyhoo its the "Vice Versas" Tommy would find hard to swallow.
LoL
edit on 18-2-2019 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 18 2019 @ 11:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: MadLad

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: MadLad

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: MadLad

Where do we defend "child abusers"?

We hint all Muslims are not "child abusers" just as all British people are not Tommy Robinson.
LoL



You guys keep denouncing Robinson for trying to film child abusers.


The UK has very strict rules on trial process and integrity. There is a perfectly valid argument that some of those rules are overly strict but that does not change the fact that those rules exist.

Robinson was very well aware those rules and the potential consequences yet persisted with his actions knowing that it could have resulted in a mistrial.

The closest anyone is getting to defending child abusers are those defending Robinson's reckless and self serving behaviour.



This is all you guys have are the theoretical mistrials that never happened.


Glad you are so relaxed about child abusers potentially getting off.




top topics



 
4
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join