It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Let's be honest... what does the modern Democratic party even offer if one is a straight white male?
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: mikell
Our company got rid of the older people a couple of years ago. Early retirement and such. Guess who they are hiring back because the younger ones are only wanting part time work. My assistant is back making nearly twice what he was. It's pretty funny really. Call them back to save the day!!
I've been in IT for most of my career. I've seen that happen so many times. They lay off or force retirement, then quickly realize they got rid of the one person that knows an antiquated program/system, or weird filing system etc.
That's some pretty funny stuff!
originally posted by: JAGStorm
I was reading up on 2020 candidates and would be candidates.
A familiar face popped up, Joe Biden. I know people have their opinions of him which is fine.
I have seen first hand, with my own eyes how he went out of his way to personally help a friend of mine.
That is the kind of stuff that isn't show on the news or tabloids. Well anyways, as I was reading I was
absolutely taken aback by this.
The left does not want him because:
“Let’s be honest: He’s an older white guy,”
www.mcclatchydc.com...
Well I guess they are not splitting hairs anymore they are just coming out and saying it, if you are a Man, or white, or older you aren't what
they are looking for. Isn't that sumthin... Is this what our country has come to? If that isn't the most racist, sexist, age discrimination I've ever read I don't know what is.
Two wrongs don't make a right. What is civil rights? = the rights of citizens to political /social freedom and equality.
Ironically enough, it was the Democratic Party who were out front leading the fight against minorities and women being allowed to vote in the eras you're talking about. It seems to be a trend that the party must, at all times, be denying rights and oppressing at least one wide swath of the country. Seems to be a systemic issue with them, doesn't it?
originally posted by: queenofswords
Democrats don't even realize how narrow-minded, divisive, and intolerant they are. They actually think their idiotic hijinks and insults are open-minded, inclusive, and tolerant. They are ill.
Yet for some reason you chose from a long and expansive article only one sentence by one man to focus on and then declare it as almost a consensuses of the racism, sexism and ageism you want to paint the entire party with.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
I recall a number of them agreeing with Shelley Garland's Huffpo article before the backlash was viewed as being too massive to confront and they "exposed" Garland as being a fraud... the point there was that "White men should be disenfranchised and lose their right to vote" and yeah, a lot of the far left radicals climbed on board that concept with full gusto...
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
I recall a number of them agreeing with Shelley Garland's Huffpo article before the backlash was viewed as being too massive to confront and they "exposed" Garland as being a fraud... the point there was that "White men should be disenfranchised and lose their right to vote" and yeah, a lot of the far left radicals climbed on board that concept with full gusto...
My question back to you is who on the ''far left''. Anyone I would have heard of? And sure, I have no doubt that there were some who agreed with the hoax piece but to label them ''far left'' rather than malcontents, which I would call them, fails to recognize the similarities between malcontents who have been divided up into two groups, left and right, by those of either side who are willing to believe just about any crap offered about the ''other side''.