Image of bound woman on truck outrages some

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Oooooh, now that there is an attention getter. I take it that is NOT gonna be Decaf chocalocka whatever with avacado sauce on top.

a reply to: Boadicea

Um, yeah... that's it. Because forcefully restraining people is necessary and appropriate for people cooperating and working together? No. This is deranged. And everyone here knows it.

Where is your diversity?

Many Democratic and Republican Politicians are into BDSM and like to be tied up.

Would it be better if he had a picture of a late term abortion happening?

Or maybe a pic of a cross dressing pre-teen having dollar bills thrown at him by scantily dressed men?

a reply to: pavil

Oh dear... what are you all trying to do to me???

I now have a mental image of Pelosi tied up in the pic on the back of that pickup... ohhhhh is it fugly!

That's it. I'm not listening any more. I'm done.

... la la la la... (plugging ears and eyes squeezed shut)... la la la la...

Some people cannot discern the difference between fantasy and reality. It's not the fault of the guy driving that truck. Nine out of 10 women do not look like that--dressed up OR down.

That news story reminded me of George Carlin's classic line, "You ever notice that most women who are against abortion are women you wouldn't wanna pork in the first place?"

Except he didn't say 'pork'.

originally posted by: Boadicea
Wow. Just wow.

A man thinks a lifesize photo depicting a woman sexually brutalized and victimized is "comical and funny"... and that --

“She’s not tied up against her will,” Sexton said. “Her clothes aren’t roughed up, her hair’s not all messed up, she doesn’t have tears in her eyes, it’s not a forcible tied up kind of thing.”

Um, yeah... that's it. Because forcefully restraining people is necessary and appropriate for people cooperating and working together? No. This is deranged. And everyone here knows it.

Yes, Boad, because a sexy woman with a smoldering come-hither gaze is depicting brutalization and violence.

IMO, it's a very well done piece of artwork in it's details. Kind of looks like a young Sandra Bullock, and frankly, my use of "smoldering gaze" is an understatement.

Jesus Christ on a Cracker, people need to pull the sticks out of their asses. Whiny Mrs Lovejoy-type women aren't doing us ANY favors here. I'm so tired of listening to women complain over banal baloney, it completely saps any legitimacy from real issues. If I wanted an opinion on suggestive imagery, I'd have asked the male half of the relationship to remove a body part from a mouth....

originally posted by: Bluntone22
I man in Missouri has a tailgate wrap depicting a bound and gagged women in the bed of his truck.

This upset some people..

www.google.com...


With the 50 shades of grey scene today maybe some people thought he was a fan.

Apparently for 3 months hes only had positive feedback and then it hit social media and boom.


To funny....

I've seen far worse on.. I mean, I've heard there is far worse on PornHub.

a woman being punched, kicked, and slapped, as she gags, and then is forced to say she loved it....

Where are they, there. then?

depravity knows no bounds, and nor do, these people, in general.

originally posted by: eXia7
I like it.

People are too upset over the smallest s#

Yeah.. no one should like the idea of a woman bound.

just me though... it's not funny, it's sad.

originally posted by: markovian
if a image that's not real bothers you

do the world a favor find a suicide booth and deposit 25 cents

Ahh, so you're all for child exploitation porn, if it's in cartoon, huh.

I mean, it's just images.. no?

originally posted by: projectvxn
Social media should be renamed to the Outrage Factory Network.

Sadly to admit.. I am a member of the Troll Social Media Network.. and we rely on the Outrage Factory Network, these days.

You ever go so bad on someone on youtube, that then find you on facebook, and continue?

It is then, you know you have them in your grips... so much info, soo.. but I've said too much.

a reply to: Nyiah

Yes, Boad, because a sexy woman with a smoldering come-hither gaze is depicting brutalization and violence.

You really want to go there? Okay.

Um... well... I didn't see any "smoldering" or "come-hither gaze"... so obviously I wasn't referring to that, was I? I saw a woman with her head and neck jammed down into her shoulders and in pain...

But that says "smoldering" to you... okay. Gotcha.

Any possible "come-hither gaze" is more like a "please help me!"

But that's an invitation to you... okay. Gotcha.

And, of course, by "brutality" and "violence" I was referring to the use of forceful restraints. Quickly and easily recognized for exactly what they are and for what purpose. You know... those things used to force someone into positions they don't want to be in... to do things to them that they do not want done... brutally... violently... savagely.

Yeah. You know. You know damn well, don't you? Of course you do.

And you really thought you could shame or embarrass me with this deranged claptrap? LOL!!! Not a chance.

I am very happy to let my words stand on their own merit.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Nyiah

Yes, Boad, because a sexy woman with a smoldering come-hither gaze is depicting brutalization and violence.

You really want to go there? Okay.

Um... well... I didn't see any "smoldering" or "come-hither gaze"... so obviously I wasn't referring to that, was I? I saw a woman with her head and neck jammed down into her shoulders and in pain...

But that says "smoldering" to you... okay. Gotcha.

Any possible "come-hither gaze" is more like a "please help me!"

But that's an invitation to you... okay. Gotcha.

And, of course, by "brutality" and "violence" I was referring to the use of forceful restraints. Quickly and easily recognized for exactly what they are and for what purpose. You know... those things used to force someone into positions they don't want to be in... to do things to them that they do not want done... brutally... violently... savagely.

Yeah. You know. You know damn well, don't you? Of course you do.

And you really thought you could shame or embarrass me with this deranged claptrap? LOL!!! Not a chance.

I am very happy to let my words stand on their own merit.

This is not the look of someone in pain, this is a straight up bedroom eyes "You know want this" look.

a reply to: Nyiah

This is not the look of someone in pain, this is a straight up bedroom eyes "You know want this" look.

Oh wow. No projection or ideation there....

Even if I play into the game, then the entire point of this depiction is for her to be a helpless and defenseless victim, in fear of what's about to be done to her against her will and without her consent. That's the fantasy. So no, even playing the stupid game, she is supposed to appear terrified!

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Nyiah

This is not the look of someone in pain, this is a straight up bedroom eyes "You know want this" look.

Oh wow. No projection or ideation there....

Even if I play into the game, then the entire point of this depiction is for her to be a helpless and defenseless victim, in fear of what's about to be done to her against her will and without her consent. That's the fantasy. So no, even playing the stupid game, she is supposed to appear terrified!

She doesn't look particularly terrified to me.

Now Lygia, she sure looks it.


That's a statue in front of the Ringling Museum of Art in Sarasota, FL. Been there and seen it many times, even my kids saw it on several trips firsthand. Considering the context of why Lygia is tied to a bull, THAT is more disturbing than tied up truck bed girl is.

In America its not that is it tasteful or not, its if its obscene or not,it isn't. Otherwise we are getting damn close to curbing freedom of expression, freedom of thought thats core to American values. You can protest, you can shame, and I understand, but you cant legislate against it. Its the same as Charlie Hebdo, and Larry Flynt, cant stand either one personally, but they aren't and shouldn't be illegal.

Whats funny though is the SCOTUS has spoken on things like this, and found they are lawful in the past. Now the left is screaming over stuff like this, and they may soon have a much more conservative SCOTUS that would agree.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: pavil

Oh dear... what are you all trying to do to me???

I now have a mental image of Pelosi tied up in the pic on the back of that pickup... ohhhhh is it fugly!

That's it. I'm not listening any more. I'm done.

... la la la la... (plugging ears and eyes squeezed shut)... la la la la...

If you don't think most of our political leaders are Kink monsters, then you haven't been paying attention.

Ever wonder why the Congressional Hush Slush fund is never brought up, no matter which party is in power?

Nancy would be the one dishing out pain, not receiving it, IMO. That should make you feel better.