It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: seeker1963
No she is not and clearly you have no idea about her policies.
She is a major so take that for what it is. She is the only one that can challenge Trump in 2020.
Just because she is a "dem" does not mean she is a gun grabber dude.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: MisterMcKill
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Fairfax Given Until Monday To Resign Or Face Impeachment
Now that a second credible accuser has stepped forward with allegations that Justin Fairfax (D-VA) raped her, members of his own party will start impeachment proceedings Monday if he refuses to resign the lieutenant governors office this weekend.
All joking aside from the complete clusterflock of Virginia politics, what the hell?
Now I don't give a god damn what effing "party" you belong to, but people in the US are innocent until proven guilty.
Not any more.
All you need to do is accuse.
Screw evidence. Screw testimony.
Just find someone you don't like, accuse them of some crap, and ruin their lives.
If democrats want to impeach then have a trial. Prove guilt.
Our country is so effing screwed up.
Normally I would agree, but this man is not entitled to his government job. The issue is that he can no longer govern effectively because people have lost trust in him. Maybe he did it. Maybe not. But people still need leadership that at least pretends to be accountable. So he should resign. His life is not ruined. He will do just fine for himself in the private sector. I appreciate your sense of justice, but I think it is misplaced in this case.
Would you feel the same if you were falsely accused of doing something you didn't do? Would you step down if you were innocent?
Regardless of whether or not he can bounce back, what happened to innocent until proven guilty?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Gothmog
According to the OP Clinton should've been brought to trial and found guilty before impeachment proceedings began. Completely ignorant of the fact that the impeachment proceedings are due process in cases like this.
That's the point I was making.
If you uncommon, common sense types want to limit the second then use method founders provided rather than unconstitutional legislation and activist courts which is at its core dishonest self serving and subversive to the constitution.
No one would stand for ANY like restrictions on any of the other amendments