Due Process is dead. . . . Lady Justice has been sexually assaulted

Sick/Twisted. Innocent (4now) Black guy being forced out.

Guilty CoonMen stay.

Black Caucus sides with Coon Men.
theconservativetreehouse.com... fax-must-resign/

originally posted by: DBCowboy

Not any more.


All you need to do is accuse.


Screw evidence. Screw testimony.

Just find someone you don't like, accuse them of some crap, and ruin their lives.

If democrats want to impeach then have a trial. Prove guilt.

PROVE GUILT!


Our country is so effing screwed up.

Not even accused... Halloween costume picture anyone...

They are going to take out the top three in the Government there and put a Republican in place...lol 2 for Black Face and 1 for allegations out of thin air with no due process of any kind.

a reply to: norhoc

You could have been so much more effective if you could have resisted the insults.

You fully understood that the point of this thread, and IAMTAT's supportive post, is that you can effectively ruin someone's career just by having a couple of accusers and that is not right.

But just because they might not have all the statutes and legal terms memorized perfectly, you had to go and be a dick about it... smh.

a reply to: 3n19m470


Sorry if you feel someone stating the facts is "being a dick", Talk about insulting someone. I did not resort to calling names all I did was state fact. Go melt snowflake

originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: IAMTAT





Impeachment in the United States is the process by which the lower house of a legislature brings charges against a civil officer of government for crimes alleged to have been committed, analogous to the bringing of an indictment by a grand jury. At the federal level, this is at the discretion of the House of Representatives. Most impeachments have concerned alleged crimes committed while in office, though there have been a few cases in which officials have been impeached and subsequently convicted for crimes committed prior to taking office.[1] The impeached official remains in office until a trial is held. That trial, and their removal from office if convicted, is separate from the act of impeachment itself.


There you go, do a little research before you post ..

-------
Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt

Thanks for the clarification.
Your added insult, however, was unnessesary...as I'd already thought you a fool.

a reply to: IAMTAT


Right snowflake, I am a fool because I know the facts and am educated on the topics at hand. That seems to be the America we live in though where the people that are informed and make logical arguments are made out to be the bad guy and fools.

I thought the EXACT same thing, DC, watching the news this morning.
And it got me thinking.
The Democrats set a VERY dangerous precedent with the whole Kavanaugh hearings, and while they continue to do so, I don't think they have taken 5 seconds to think about the possible consiquences.
What happens when people start coming out of the woodwork, with acusations against all of them, made up or not? I mean, people are seeing this work, without any proof, right?

Hell, the hubby could say Alexandria Oasio-Cortez sexually assaulted him, right?

Innocent until proven guilty.
RIP

a reply to: DBCowboy

We in Virginia are witnessing a coup.

Curious question is from whom?

a reply to: norhoc


We warned them! This whole PC stazi and those who forced it upon all of us were warned that it would end up with them eating their own. They made their bed, they can ROT in their own filth as far as I am concerned. When they stand up and say they were wrong? I will listen and consider forgiving them. Until then? It must suck wallowing in your own filth.


]]]

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: DBCowboy

We in Virginia are witnessing a coup.

Curious question is from whom?

Apparently by a bunch of baby-killers in blackface.

originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: Allaroundyou


FDR did begin the killing of America, He is the one that really ramped up and set us on the path to socialism.

Really it began with the reconstruction period after the civil war...but nobody wants to read history at all. Although a little socialism never hurt America.

a reply to: kelbtalfenek


You are correct, but, as I said it ramped up under FDR it was then that it became a mainstream accepted thing for the government to take care of you.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

History not taught in socialist federal school programming,

Very first google return on "FDR prolonged depression"

UCLA (unbiased as one can get)

"High wages and high prices in an economic slump run contrary to everything we know about market forces in economic downturns," Ohanian said. "As we've seen in the past several years, salaries and prices fall when unemployment is high. By artificially inflating both, the New Deal policies short-circuited the market's self-correcting forces.

" The policies were contained in the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), which exempted industries from antitrust prosecution if they agreed to enter into collective bargaining agreements that significantly raised wages. Because protection from antitrust prosecution all but ensured higher prices for goods and services, a wide range of industries took the bait, Cole and Ohanian found. By 1934 more than 500 industries, which accounted for nearly 80 percent of private, non-agricultural employment, had entered into the collective bargaining agreements called for under NIRA. Cole and Ohanian calculate that NIRA and its aftermath account for 60 percent of the weak recovery.

Without the policies, they contend that the Depression would have ended in 1936 instead of the year when they believe the slump actually ended: 1943. Roosevelt's role in lifting the nation out of the Great Depression has been so revered that Time magazine readers cited it in 1999 when naming him the 20th century's second-most influential figure.

FDR policies actually made us weaker prior to the war and case could be made that emboldened axis powers.

Other posters use of FDR as an example were on the spot.

On OP subject, yes, no matter partisanship or party due process is required before asking for resignations. Did Democrat Party bring this upon themselves? yes no doubt about it due "zero tolerance" bull-crap pulled on opposites.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: DBCowboy

We in Virginia are witnessing a coup.

Curious question is from whom?

Apparently by a bunch of baby-killers in blackface.

Sounds like a weird indy horror movie.....


I'd watch it.

You know what I've noticed in the reporting on this guy? The media is treating this guy more gently, IMO, than if he were a republican and or white. I've hears this whole week "sexual misconduct" or other mealy mouth terms for what is basically rape. I have been under the impression, b/c I haven't looked into it at all and have listened to NPR all week, that it was something like azz grabbing, awkward hugs, or maybe a scorned ex girlfriend or one night stand. The media have been giving him a free pass, not once have I heard the words "forced oral sex" or the big R word, which was used incessantly by the same station for Kavanaugh.

I also listened to Colbert and Maher (yeah I'm a glutton for punishment sometime, but it gives a good viewpoint of how they think), and they are on the same page as NPR - the ALLEGATIONS (which is made explicitly clear) of sexual misconduct - which is such a broad term which could even encompass, these days, innocuous comments taken the wrong way.

If held to the same standards that they felt needed to be implemented with Kavanaugh, this guy should be rode out of town on a rail, tar and feathered and tattoo'd RAPIST on his forehead - after doing a deep dive into every other sexual encounter, past/current drinking or drug use, etc.

So is it because this guy is a democrat or because he is black/isn't white that the media is handling him with kid gloves and comparatively giving him a free pass?

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Heck yeah! It could be like Rocky Horror and we could all dress up and put on makeup!

Oh wait....

An indicator of his provable innocence or guilt would be if he resigned or went to trial. He may resign just to prevent the digging into his life by the prosecutors and the exposition of past peccadillos or additional accusers.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: DBCowboy

We in Virginia are witnessing a coup.

Curious question is from whom?

Apparently by a bunch of baby-killers in blackface.

You mean democrats, accuracy is important.

This is preposterous.

One woman claims she was raped 19 years ago in 2000 while at Duke University. She says she shared it with friends via email and Facebook. Was Facebook even a thing in 2000? (Maybe she meant that she recently shared the incident. I don't know. But, in 2000, I don't think FB was launched yet.)

Watson had shared her account of the rape in a series of emails and Facebook messages to friends, her lawyer said, and former classmates can also corroborate that Watson immediately told them Fairfax had raped her around the time it happened.

wtop.com...

If there are witnesses, then let the FBI do what they did with Kavanaugh. Have them do an investigation and get sworn testimonies by those supposed witnesses. Find those emails to friends she claims she sent. But, don't destroy this man's career without a thorough investigation.

Then, the other woman says she was FORCED to perform o.s. on Fairfax while in a his hotel room. Did he have a gun to her head? Did he drag her to his hotel room. Let's put this woman before a judge and have her explain just exactly HOW she was forced. Then, let the cards fall where they may.

Somebody wants this man out for some reason. But, there must be investigations and due process before they decide to blow up his career and reputation. The fact that Terry McAuliffe wants him out tells me a lot.

a reply to: queenofswords


Facebook launched Feb. 2004! Busted!