It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Echtelion
So you,re telling us that there is NO HIERACHY or no ranks between the 3rd and the 33th degree, right?
If that's so, they why are there degrees?
Each of the degrees DOES have a name. The Scottish Rite chose to use numbers as well (I wish they hadn't, but I wasn't born until the 1960's and the Scottish Rite was founded (invented really) in 1801. For example the 4th Degree is "Secret Master" the 14th Degree is "Perfect Elu" the 18th Degree is "Knight Rose Croix" (pronounced "kwa") the 30th Degree is "Knight Kadosh" the 32nd Degree is "Master of the Royal Secret" and the 33rd Degree is "Inspector General Honorary" The other degrees have titles too. If you'd like a list I can provide them, but a Google Search will turn them up.
Should have they just used names, or something else taht does not leads to a ranking structure, to define each position in the order?
Originally posted by mickmeaney
no offence sebatwerk but i don't think you're a Mason.
it's easy to claim anything when you're sat behind a computer.
Originally posted by akilles
Karnes, no offense, but I think they made you Grand Master of your lodge to ensure loyalty.
Hate to have to go into the motivations why a group of men who DO NOT control Freemasonry would try to get others to be controlled by it....
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by mickmeaney
no offence sebatwerk but i don't think you're a Mason.
it's easy to claim anything when you're sat behind a computer.
No offense mickmeaney but I don't think YOU'RE a "Higher Revolutionary Mutation Activist"
So there.
What does that prove?
Sebatwerk IS a Mason. Why wouldn't you believe him? ...or could you just not think of anything else to say since your posts have contributed NOTHING?
Originally posted by akilles
Karnes, no offense, but I think they made you Grand Master of your lodge to ensure loyalty.
Hate to have to go into the motivations why a group of men who DO NOT control Freemasonry would try to get others to be controlled by it....
Originally posted by mickmeaney
Just the media streams - and thanks for the points you're giving me by posting on my thread
I don't think he is a Mason because he acts like a child sometimes and is often insultive to people. That is the fist comment I have posted which may offend someone. I don't think it will be the last, I just got sick of seeing people like him posting.. it's like more every week. And yes, I know I haven't helped matters. It's great to know he has a personal body guard here on ATS.. dude, let the man fight his own battles. We are all grown ups here, right?
[edit on 31-3-2005 by mickmeaney]
Originally posted by mickmeaney
I don't think he is a Mason because he acts like a child sometimes and is often insultive to people. That is the fist comment I have posted which may offend someone. I don't think it will be the last, I just got sick of seeing people like him posting.. it's like more every week. And yes, I know I haven't helped matters. It's great to know he has a personal body guard here on ATS.. dude, let the man fight his own battles. We are all grown ups here, right?
Originally posted by akilles
Its all about confidence games with you guys, the SS I'll call you.
You see, SS, its not that non-Masons think they 'know better' or know 'more' about Freemasonry, in many cases they are just more skeptical and cautious individuals!
A moral man would never associate himself with people if he didn't know for sure EVERYONE that he was associating himself WITH.
A honest man would never give his word without knowing what he is giving it for.
And so, by its very requirements, we can see that Freemasonry attracts a specific kind of member. So how can you say that we are claiming to be smarter than Freemasons, or know more than they do?
Is someone claiming to KNOW MORE if they say if there was ANY conspiracy in Freemasonry, it is IMPOSSIBLE for every Freemason to be involved? No. And yet, here I say it, and I WILL be accused of baseless accusations (again).
And so everytime the only argument goes: Are you saying the people inside Freemasonry are stupid?
I mean, they must be. Its the gist of every nonMason's argument, isn't it?
Freemasonry uses the most advanced deception techniques known to man, how is being a trusting person that is taken advantage of make you stupid?
Its the old story, if it was bad, my uncle/grandfather/pappy wouldn't have been involved. Well, let me put it to you this way. If Freemasonry was perfect, no one would leave ever. So when someone leaves (or GROUPS AND GROUPS EN MASSE as after the Masonic killing of Capt. Morgan) Freemasonry, then they are saying they there is something wrong with Freemasonry, right?
Its screwy logic, and its the same thing you guys use (esp. Jobie Girl....) to say that NO ONE would be in Freemasonry if ANYTHING bad ever happened.
Its clear that when things benefit the individual, you would not leave Freemasonry, nor would you complain about it.
In fact, you would cover up the fact that you benefitted at all...
Originally posted by akilles
You see, SS, its not that non-Masons think they 'know better' or know 'more' about Freemasonry, in many cases they are just more skeptical and cautious individuals!
A moral man would never associate himself with people if he didn't know for sure EVERYONE that he was associating himself WITH.
A honest man would never give his word without knowing what he is giving it for.
And so, by its very requirements, we can see that Freemasonry attracts a specific kind of member. So how can you say that we are claiming to be smarter than Freemasons, or know more than they do?
Freemasonry uses the most advanced deception techniques known to man, how is being a trusting person that is taken advantage of make you stupid?
So when someone leaves (or GROUPS AND GROUPS EN MASSE as after the Masonic killing of Capt. Morgan) Freemasonry, then they are saying they there is something wrong with Freemasonry, right?
Its screwy logic, and its the same thing you guys use (esp. Jobie Girl....) to say that NO ONE would be in Freemasonry if ANYTHING bad ever happened.
Its clear that when things benefit the individual, you would not leave Freemasonry, nor would you complain about it.
Originally posted by akilles
A honest man would never give his word without knowing what he is giving it for.
Originally posted by akilles
"everytime the only argunow exment goes: Are you saying the people inside Freemasonry are stupid?
They must be, otherwise they would know all the stuff the non-Masons warn about. Its the gist of that every nonMason's argument, is calling you stupid for not seeing for yourself?
Freemasonry uses the most advanced deception techniques known to man, how is being a trusting person that is taken advantage of make you stupid?"
Now let me just emphasize a point here:
A moral man would never associate himself with people if he didn't know for sure EVERYONE that he was associating himself with.
A honest man would never give his word without knowing what he is giving it for.
Originally posted by intrepid
sebatwerk, we are making some progress here, please grow with us.
I know you think elsewise but I think that others can see what is being said here. That means that you can back off. Offence is not always the best avenue.