It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

‘Always Been Dirty’: Nearly Every Organization Associated With Trump Under Investigation

page: 3
17
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: LDragonFire

Trump said the Russian thing was a witch hunt.

I don't recall him saying anything about Trump University legal actions and lawsuits being a witch hunt, could you possibly show your source?

Or would that be one of those anonymous super secret sources?

A lot of things in today's world could be considered "a rip off". Too bad they dont all get the same attention as Trump University.

Can we cry and kick and scream for everyone who rented a timeshare so they can get their money back? Oh but "it was a rip off", it "wasnt fair" and "people were taken advantage of"... Doesn't that matter? Oh, you mean to tell me if someone is stupid enough to buy it then maybe they need to learn their lesson? Interesting concept.




posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 12:36 PM
link   
UNITY...LOL.



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer



Why would you start now? Why not start at the beginning, President Obama knew of Russian interference but did nothing, was that because Obama was stupid? Explain that logic. Could it be that Obama knew that it was a small operation that did little to nothing to affect the election, like has already been reported?

Now, explain your position, logically.
edit on 6-2-2019 by thedigirati because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 12:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
Why would you start now? Why not start at the beginning, President Obama knew of Russian interference but did nothing, was that because Obama was stupid? Explain that logic. Could it be that Obama knew that it was a small operation that did little to nothing to affect the election, like has already been reported?

Now, explain your position, logically.


Oh boy, I suspect you meant to reply to me but failed.

To put in simple terms, Mueller's report will or will not list the degree to which Russian interference occurred in relation to Trump winning the presidency. To make suppositions in either direction is folly (and as I mentioned before, illogical), so logically the only thing we can do is wait to see what evidence Mueller's team has found.

Moving the goalpost or trying to divert the argument away from this is a feeble (and ironically also an illogical) attempt.



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

Sorry I'm on an xbox, if that offends you, buy me a laptop.

I did not move anything, you made a statement of fact but only have supposition to back it up.

You can still make it to your safe space, no worries.



ETA: President Trump was a Democrat during the time he was allegedly so dirty, just to remind you and everyone else
edit on 6-2-2019 by thedigirati because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: Wayfarer

Sorry I'm on an xbox, if that offends you, buy me a laptop.

I did not move anything, you made a statement of fact but only have supposition to back it up.

You can still make it to your safe space, no worries.


You strike me as the kind of person that prefers to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps, so I don't really know why you're asking for a laptop handout.

You did move the goalpost, precisely by trying to shift the argument onto Obama.

I don't know why you think I or anyone else needs safe spaces....



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 12:56 PM
link   
Now do the Clintons, because even a 2 year old knows by now, that the Clintons are so dirty and corrupt that the name is synonymous with crooked.

Go ahead, I'll wait.



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: whywhynot

Dont believe you... even a little.



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 01:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

Where did i shift anything to Obama? I said Obama didn't think the Russians did anything to merit much of a response, yes?

So go and explain how only after election night that it's a problem, logically of course, I have faith in you being up to the challange.



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 01:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: ADVISOR
Now do the Clintons, because even a 2 year old knows by now, that the Clintons are so dirty and corrupt that the name is synonymous with crooked.

Go ahead, I'll wait.


but, but, but, the clintons....


Don't you find it odd that trump hasn't had his AG to file any indictments? Especially on "crooked Hillary"?

Go ahead, I'll wait for your answer...
edit on 6-2-2019 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: Wayfarer

Where did i shift anything to Obama? I said Obama didn't think the Russians did anything to merit much of a response, yes?


Are you joking? Obama's response was swift and devastating!




posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 02:23 PM
link   
Don't you people ever get sick of the same argument every day? Answer: no. Get a life you outrage monkeys. Anger junkies. Keyboard chunkies. Go outside and walk around. It's actually not nearly as bad as they tell you.



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 02:33 PM
link   
a reply to: smurfy
Well you know what they say about opinions don’t you?



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot

Dont believe you... even a little.


That makes you even ridiculous



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 03:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: Wayfarer

Where did i shift anything to Obama? I said Obama didn't think the Russians did anything to merit much of a response, yes?

So go and explain how only after election night that it's a problem, logically of course, I have faith in you being up to the challange.


This is like beating a dead horse explaining this to you. We're talking about Trump's potential involvement with Russia during the 2016 election. Obama's stance/actions on Russia are a separate point. Surely you can grasp that.

If you want to discuss Obama's actions we can do so in another thread or as a separate element entirely. To bring it up as your first response to my post is clearly just a red herring fallacy, and neither adds something worthwhile to the discussion nor addresses/counters my original point.



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

You wouldn't be convinced if I posted a video with Killary admitting everything on camera.

So what's the point in trying, your mind is already made up for you...



posted on Feb, 6 2019 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: olaru12

You wouldn't be convinced if I posted a video with Killary admitting everything on camera.

So what's the point in trying, your mind is already made up for you...


BS, indite her, put her on trial and prosecute her to the fullest if she is found guilty.

The same with the trump family... Let Mueller finish the investigation and let the chips fall where they may.
edit on 6-2-2019 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 7 2019 @ 03:02 AM
link   
a reply to: LDragonFire

Only a fool such as you would post this,but plenty of millenium's here,mom's basement is full,the liberal media makes up fake crap,and people with little to no education take the idea and run,how lame you answered your own question



posted on Feb, 8 2019 @ 09:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
You seem to forget that the media, and the Democrat supporters, are also 'America',

No, they aren't, and that is the point.

Socialists (and the other related 'ists') are not 'America', they are 'Anti-America'.



posted on Feb, 8 2019 @ 09:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Duderino
California has 12.1% of the USA population (39.5m out of 325.7m) and 10.2% of the Electoral College (55 out of 538). So California is getting a bit screwed and is getting under-represented at the moment.

Ahem... actually, since Cali only represents 4.31% of the land mass, I would argue that 10.2% is a dramatic over-representation.


In any case, what 3 million are you talking about? And can you link to any legit info that shows how many illegals voted in California?

If there were any 'legit info' proving the massive illegal alien vote fraud, many high ranking government officials would be in jail (or, if I had my way, hung for Treason). Since they control the machinery that could prove their crimes, they of course choose not to provide said info.

There really needs to be a very clear cut method and system for maintaining the integrity of the system. Right now, there isn't.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join