originally posted by: JohnnyJetson
a reply to: Malak777
I fear the cat has been let out of the bag too much and we will not be able to get it back in again.
WUT!? do you even know what that saying means?
If you did you'd realize we want "the cat" in the bag!"
Most people are so dumb now.
but not you ...
Yes, too dumb if they believe that destroying everything we were is somehow going to make us all amazing and the leaders of the free Liberal World.
There is no getting away from civilized responsibility. That CAT is well and truly out of the bag.
I deliberately said it because it is a clawing cat in a bag. They would do well to keep their little secret and maintain at least the semblance of
I am saying clearly that we are doomed if we let Luciferian society run and shape us. It is like handing over authority to every foul demon in Hell
and thinking they will take care of baby while you go out partying. It will not be the case.
Really it has gone too far and that is why we have this backlash. How long will it be before it becomes Liberalism by the sword? That would be the
most ironic turn of events. I make no secret that my faith is the best informer of my civility. I would not even bother to express myself except the
occasion demands it. Until Liberalism stops being extreme I must challenge it for the sake of my civilization and my own freedom and welfare.
I'm just another voter, but if they want to know does G-D cast a vote. Well yes, it is democracy after all. Or would I be told you should not be
allowed to have your faith inform your voting behaviour and politics?
The article is quite clearly about more than art. It is referencing the whole. It is intellectualizing and philosophizing, not just in relation to
art, as this quote from the article reveals,
Although there may be differences between those who do “bad” things and those who don’t, these are not fundamental. Acknowledging the
similarities between all of us can be far more useful than aggressively highlighting the differences. Research from neuroscience and behavioural
economics, psychology and criminology, history and politics all point to the same finding: everyone is capable of great harm. However, given its
universal nature, maybe our capacity for deviance and harm can somehow be good for us. Evil is typically referred to when there is deviance from
social norms: formal deviance is the violation of laws, like theft, murder, and assault, while informal deviance involves violations of social norms,
like lying. Evil behaviour is typically thought to embrace one or both forms. However, deviance can also describe a behaviour that simply diverges
from the norm.
The writer does not know her butt from her elbow. She is naive. She avoids her own argument by separating "deviance" from "good and evil", while the
article totally relies on the notion than evil can sometimes be good, when it is the opposite of good by definition set in language.
Jesus and also in the OT state clearly that anything other than clear indicators is of "the Evi One". Good can never be evil and evil can never be
good. It will be evil to try and bring them together in any kind of manipulation. They are opposing forces.
The writer is writing psychotically here. She is not maintaining a consistent argument. She has to deviate from good and evil itself by separating
deviance from good and evil so good and evil are no longer equated with deviance. Does that stop the word from meaning what it means?
"the fact or state of diverging from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behaviour."
I see straight through her. She is even trying to make deviance look all sexy. She chose her word very precisely at least. Yes, we all know about the
site "Deviant Art". I have been looking at pictures there for many years. She is like a lecturer with a new toy.
If you are a musician being a total deviant Rimbaud gets you a good tune and death at 27 because your body and mind did not enjoy your deviance as
much as your songwriting did.
If you let dishonesty in for any motive you believe to be beneficial you have already opened the door to your enemy to give him free entry to all room
s of your soul. When the time comes for you to be honest, when tempted with something wonderful that reqires dishonesty to achieve it, you will
naturally equate it with the high performance and reward of former deviant behavior and your morality will have no strength against the might of the
temptation. That is why criminals carry on committing crimes, but only until they get caught!
It will be no good going to the Judge when you are on trial for embezzlement and telling them that deviance is a virtue. If we do not maintain moral
discipline we let the tempation in. We even get tempted to allow our enemy to come in and destroy us if he can blind us with the desirability of
something he has. It is that "Trojan Horse" tactic. It works every time.
Breaking the rules to encourage creativity is echoed by the slogan “move fast and break things”, often associated with an entrepreneurial
climate notorious for creativity and progress – Silicon Valley. New generation workspaces often intentionally create physical and social structures
that are abnormal. This controlled “deviance” can stimulate new connections, brave new ideas.
Move fast and break things??? What - us, what - nature, what - civilization, what - our trade edge, what - our whole social structure and the nuclear
family, what - democracy? Break what exactly???
If she is on about breaking me then it will not be happening. She will bounce off and break herself. Every confident Martial Artist knows how to use
an enemy's blows against the enemy who throws them.
I think her attitudes are degenerate. I wholly condemn the whole "ethos" (a contradiction of terms) as no other ethos at all other than a cheap trick
to stimulate us like a street drug. Everything is up for grabs for the sake of a quick buck, eh! Break a few people on the way, no problem!
She is sheltered and out of touch with political reality. She thinks she is immune to being the one broken because somehow she has the intellect to be
Super Woman, doing what no other has ever done.
If she were my student she would get a "D" for this, for being clever yet manipulating the whole to suit her narrative instead of studying the
narrative. Yes, dumb! The intellectuals are looking dumb and self destructive to me, thoroughly sold out to delusion.
How can you ever hope to do anything heroic if you tell lies? You will just be another lush on the sidewalk of cheats and liars. We have a bunch of
them. What we lack is honesty and integrity. I bet you my integrity could make your company a hell of a lot more than her embezzling "little white
lies". She is ideologically giving free license to ever defrauding act if it is fashionably "witchy" enough for her and not too evil.
I feel bad for taking her to bits, but sorry, my own integrity has given me the creative impulse to write something honest that very clearly reflects
what I think of her verbal splurge.
Health warning! Behaving like a devil will not help you. It will destroy you and get you thrown in jail or worse eventually.
edit on 3-2-2019 by Malak777 because: (no reason given)