It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

So, someone dug up the Virginia abortion governor's yearbook...

page: 17
75
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: toolgal462
Anyone see the short video clip of this fool ignoring the black man attempting to shake his hand?

The guy is trash.


THIS?
www.youtube.com...




posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT
Yes, that's the one. Tell me there aint something wrong with that man?

How and why did Democrats allow this guy to run?



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 03:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: IAMTAT
Yes, that's the one. Tell me there aint something wrong with that man?

How and why did Democrats allow this guy to run?


I think he's likely a complete fraud, liar and a hypocrite...but I didn't vote for him.
The good Democrats of VA chose this guy...they're responsible for his being there.

ALSO...$2M from Planned Parenthood helped put him there too.




edit on 2-2-2019 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 03:54 PM
link   
Seriously, does anyone think this guy won a Michael Jackson dance competition?



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 03:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
Seriously, does anyone think this guy won a Michael Jackson dance competition?


Doing it in blackface probably clinched it for him.

BTW...Why does he think he gets a pass on that?



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 03:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil


Seriously, does anyone think this guy won a Michael Jackson dance competition?


Maybe at the KKK talent show...



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: ker2010

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SeaWorthy


s I am just asking what anyone should ask why is this such a big deal. It was college, drunk party days.


Its not a big deal unless a Republican does it.


I am so glad I have zero interest in political parties!



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 05:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: StallionDuck

originally posted by: ker2010

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SeaWorthy


s I am just asking what anyone should ask why is this such a big deal. It was college, drunk party days.


Its not a big deal unless a Republican does it.


According to CNN, he IS a republican... lol


Just goes to show you... There are no longer any excuses or exceptions. If you do something dumb when you're 18, expect to live with it destroying your life for the REST of your life.

Gotta love this!

Is this what we wanted? No? Too bad... Can't take it back now. What will be offensive tomorrow may not be offensive today. That means we're probably all screwed.


yeah throw out Tom sawyer and a whole lot of stuff, even epics like Gone with the Wind.



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 05:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: xuenchen
LOL

Northam says it was a Michael Jackson costume.

How many stories i.e. excuses so far .... ? 🤣


No he said he remembers doing MJ that was not the time in the picture it was a dance contest.


Oh shurrrrrrr lol 🤣

I really tried to picture this and I just could not do it! lol!

Guy painted black and moonwalking maybe!



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 05:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Clearly time-travelling Republicans went back in time to when the yearbook editor was assembling the yearbook and snuck that photo onto his page.


I am pretty sure it happened.





posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 05:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: ker2010

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SeaWorthy


s I am just asking what anyone should ask why is this such a big deal. It was college, drunk party days.


Its not a big deal unless a Republican does it.


Yeah, Republicans are always the poor little victims.



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 05:45 PM
link   
So, how long ago is long enough, I wonder?

This is getting beyond stupid.



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 06:16 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull

Well, they went back to high school to smear Kav as a drinker. I have to imagine there would be no statute of limitations for a drinker who dared wear black makeup in a gross Klan gag.

If rules were rules, and we weren't just weaponizing outrage, of course.



I suspect it will gradually stop getting mentioned because the machine tends to take care of its own, and creating the right to comfortably hold a delivered black baby girl in stasis while you decide whether to kill her or not (in the name of women's rights, of course) is more important to them than the opportunity to be offended by stupid Klansmen/blackface like the forgetful ol' Coonman did is.
edit on 2-2-2019 by RadioRobert because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 06:17 PM
link   
a reply to: SeaWorthy

Yeah, maybe he would have been better off using the democrats default and blame all of this on the Russians, walk away and call it a day?




posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 06:22 PM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

I know, that was completely out of bounds. ...and I said so many times.



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 06:22 PM
link   
Here's what I don't understand.
The yearbook editor's name and whatever staff was involved would have their names listed in the book itself.

With so much riding on this and with all the media attention and organizations that have a stake in this story...WHY hasn't the yearbook staff/editor been tracked down by now and questioned about the photo?



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 06:26 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

If they answer the phone they'll have to explain why they chose to include Klansmen/blackface in the yearbook as they held editorial power.

Plus, they may want to lineup their story with whatever the official narrative is going to be moving forward first.



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 06:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: IAMTAT

If they answer the phone they'll have to explain why they chose to include Klansmen/blackface in the yearbook as they held editorial power.

Plus, they may want to lineup their story with whatever the official narrative is going to be moving forward first.


Possible.
OR...they've already been questioned and the answer wouldn't be helpful to Northam.



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 06:35 PM
link   
My 2 cents...this entire black-face pic is to distract from focusing on the PP issue and discussion of late term abortion on demand.

Look over there, not over here.



posted on Feb, 2 2019 @ 06:36 PM
link   
Second thing bothering me...WHY would Northam even bring up the Michael Jackson blackface story...since it wasn't even on the radar?




top topics



 
75
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join